preview

Analysis Of ' Samskara By U. R. Ananthamurthy And The Sacred Canopy By Peter L. Berger

Satisfactory Essays

Samskara by U. R. Ananthamurthy and The Sacred Canopy by Peter L. Berger both have a main focus on people in society and how religion affects society, but both have very different principals about how this relationship works. In Samskara, the entire world that the protagonists live in is based off of the caste system. The Archaryas, who are part of the Brahmin class, live in a completely different society and lifestyle than the other classes, whom which they rarely seem to even interact with (unless they 're part of the untouchables, like the character Belli). Peter L. Berger, on the other hand, argues in Sacred Canopy that the world is open for man to fashion, and there isn’t some higher caste system that is bestowed upon all members of society. Berger also writes, “To be in culture means to share in a particular world of objectives with others” (10). When Naranappa decides to rebel against the Brahmin lifestyle that was set out for him, the other Brahmins thought of him as a traitor, and couldn’t even decide for themselves whether he was actually a Brahmin anymore. According to Berger’s idea of society, Naranappa can still be considered a Brahmin and partake in other practices of the other caste systems, because that is a culture shared between all members of their society. Naranappa can still be part of the society of the Brahmins and explore the outside world, Berger writes in Sacred Canopy, “… The individual himself, unless again he encloses himself in a

Get Access