Analysis: Why College Athletes Should Be Paid

College athletes are undoubtedly some of the hardest working people in the world. Not only are they living the life of an average student, they also have a strenuous schedule with their specific sport. One of the most discussed topics in the world of college athletics is whether or not student-athletes should be paid money for playing sports. The people who disagree with the idea have some good arguments to make. Primarily that the athletes get to go to school for free for playing sports. Another argument is that if student-athletes were to get paid then it would ruin the amateurism of college sports. People who are against paying the athletes do not want to see the young people become focused on money. “Paying student-athletes

If the NCAA decided to pay college athletes, it would create more problems than solutions. For example, if student-athletes are offered a salary, most likely the cost of school tuition will go up because the money paid to the student-athletes must come from somewhere and the revenue from sporting events and memorabilia will not be enough to cover all student-athlete salaries as well as expenses to run all the college’s sports programs. In addition, not all college sports draw the same fan base and therefore, income is greatly varied between sports programs which in turn will create an unfair balance when determining the salary for each student-athlete. All student-athletes regardless of which sport they are participating would expect equal pay.

Do you want to get paid for playing a sport in college? (http://www.experienceproject.com/question-answer.php) College players should receive some payment for playing for their schools. College athletes put their bodies on the line each game they play, paying college athletes would help to begin creating a sense of financial awareness, (https://smartasset.com/retirement/should-student-athletes-be-paid ) and some athletes don't have enough money to pay for food or stuff they need and with the money they have left over they can buy things.

Sports have been a big part of culture in the United States since the 1900’s. Sports has become a multibillion dollar business of sort, with spots such as baseball, basketball, and football captivating americans.With american sports gaining popularity, the growth of college sports went on the rise. In 2013, The National Collegiate Athletic Association statistically generated $912,804,046 (Alesia, 2014). With all of this income that the NCAA brought in, one has to raise the question, should college athletes be paid? Even though college athletes are student athletes, they should be paid because they are practically employees to the college without compensation.

The Final Four generated, alone 1.3 million dollars” (Goldman). Paying athletes could also help them after college. If they don’t end up going pro they still will be in less debt. This could help there career after college which is a big step in life. Also more money can let them get healthier food and stay healthier. Plus health is a key part in success.

Whether or not student-athletes should be paid has been a hotly debated topic since the 1900s. College athletes spend just as much time, if not more time, practicing and devoting time and energy to sports as they do academics. For this, many athletes are rewarded with scholarship money. However, many people believe it is not enough. Should we pay student-athletes a slice of the wealth or is a full-ride scholarship enough? (Business Insider). What if the athlete gets injured? Where does the money come out of to support each athlete’s salary? The huge amount of money being generated from college sports has led some people to think that the athletes are entitled to some of that revenue. While, some think that student-athletes should be paid, others disagree for various reasons.

Imagine college athletes getting paid to play a sport, but technically they are not considered a “professional” athlete. It would be a terrible idea to pay college athletes to do what they are going to school for. Most college athletes get some or all of their college paid for, but they want to get paid in money too? It’s not right. They could spend the money unwisely and they could lose focus on what college is meant for and that is to learn to be able to obtain a job. I understand that college athletes have a risk of getting injured and they should get compensated for that risk. Nobody wants a student to get hurt on the field or court and lose their ability to compete and lose their scholarship, but they shouldn’t get paid to play for

Some other reasons why college athletes should not get paid are because, if they were to get paid they may focus more on their sport rather than their school work and studies. Not only is trying to balance both school and sports hard enough but if they were to get paid they may not want to focus on what there actually there for, which is their education. Paying college athletes could also cause the student to have poor money management. The students may end up getting themselves in trouble more easily or fall into bad habits. Legal troubles are always an obstacle in which college students could fall into which could end there career. Another reason college athletes should not get paid is because with the big schools such has Alabama, Florida, Indiana, or Kentucky they would bring in more money compared to smaller schools such as Loyola

College Athletes Should Get Paid College athletes have gained so much popularity in the last decade. College athletes should get paid because the NCAA is an eleven billion dollar industry, the payment would give the athlete a little more than just a degree, and it would help the athlete learn how to manage money. This paper will attempt to answer the question if college athletes should be paid by exploring the reasons for and against the payment of college athletes. Colleges and universities provided really strong educations however college isn't cheap and even with a scholarship it's not free. The "full ride" scholarship can only pay for books, room, board, fees and tuition, and according to CBS News only two percent of college athletes

If players were to be paid, many of them would not be smart with their money. The athletes would just party more in college because they would have less of a need to make it to the pros because they are already getting paid. Which would defeat the whole purpose of college sports leaving the NCAA pure entertainment and not giving us real competitive games. Nonetheless, shifting their focus away from academics even more then them not being

One of the most popular pastimes in America is watching college sports. Whether it’s football, baseball, or basketball, these student-athletes bring fans, money, and sponsorships to their schools. So why shouldn't these athletes be paid? The answer is that student-athletes should not be paid, because they have the ability to earn scholarships or financial aid, college athletes are paid in other ways than financially, and not all schools have the money to pay them. Ultimately, paying college athletes would ruin the current culture and competitiveness of college sports.

College athletes should be paid for playing college sports. One of the main reasons why college athletes should be paid is because colleges have a ton of money. Just college basketball and football alone bring in over six billion dollars a year, and the majority of that is profit. There are currently 13,877 college athletes and they are paid a total of zero dollars. Today there are thousands of athletes that don’t play college sports because they are worried that they will graduate college with little to no education and more than enough debt.

College athletes should be paid because they are “employees” of the college just as much as coaches are to the school. Coaches are in a better financial status than the players who are doing all of the hard physical work day in and day out. According to Matt Connolly, a reporter for Mic News, “The average compensation for the 108 football coaches in the NCAA’s highest division is $1.75 million. That’s up 75 percent since 2007.” The average compensation for every athlete during the same period was 0 percent because the only compensation they get is in the form of a scholarship that helps them attend the school that wants them to play sports for long hours every week. These colleges are feeding of their athletes like hungry parasites, gathering hundreds of thousands of dollars and not a single cent goes to the players who do most of the work. Every other level of sports players are paid for their labor, so why not compensate college athletes too? Many critics

College athletes should not be paid. “ They argue that the main purpose of going to college is to get a education, not to make money” (“Should college”...1). College is not a job, it is a place to learn. Also many college athletes receive scholarships to attend that school. “The value of the scholarships athletes receive during four years of college can be well over $250,000” (Weiss et al.1). Therefore, athletes

An article by American Institutes of Research states, “Many critics believe colleges and universities already devote too much money to their athletic programs and argue that this money would be better spent fulfilling higher education's original mission of producing scholarly knowledge and conducting scientific research. Another concern relates to the integrity of collegiate athletics itself. Some critics fear that paying college athletes’ money for their play would introduce the potential for athletes to begin "holding out," or refusing to play for their institutions unless increases in salary or other demands are met.” (Desrochers). Schools spend a disproportionate amount of money on athletics already without paying athletes.