Analysis of Chapter 3 of Kurth Vonnegut's Slaughter House Five

The plot of Slaughterhouse- Five revolves around World War Two, especially the bombing of Dresden from a soldier’s perspective. Vonnegut vividly describes the destructive nature of war through accounts of ambush, mistreatment of prisoners of war, and massacres. However, he also expresses the mentally and emotionally damaging effects of war with the pure insanity of Billy Pilgrim. One of many instances illustrating Billy’s altered state of mind in the war is when he arrives in a prisoner of war camp. The English prisoners put on a production of Cinderella for their American guests and following a comical line Billy loses control. “He not only laughed – he shrieked. He went on shrieking until he was carried out of the shed into another, where the hospital was” (Slaughterhouse 98). This is a single example of the deplorable state of Billy’s mental sanity. The reader is already aware that Billy also begins to hallucinate and have crazy notions that he was abducted by aliens. Billy even acquires a sort of catchphrase that clearly demonstrates how emotionally distant Billy has become because of the war. Every time death is brought up, Billy has only one thing to say about it: “So it goes” (Slaughterhouse 214). This shows that Billy has become numb to pain, anguish, fear, and even life itself. To Billy, the end of the war did not actually bring freedom, but trapped him inside the horrors of his memories and deranged

Caitlin loves Billy’s character even though he is homeless. Caitlin is fascinated with Billy’s character rather than what he has and his status. Caitlin is engrossed in Billy because he is clean. Billy keeps his clothes clean, himself clean and his carriage clean. In the passage Billy’s cave (p. 62).Caitlin says that his carriage is clean and warm. Caitlin is also attracted to billy’s character because he is not a normal hobo. Billy is smart, clean, polite and calm. In the passage Caitlin and mopping (p. 35).Caitlin says that Billy as ‘so calm’ when he exited McDonalds. This shows that Caitlin enjoys Billy’s company despite Billy not having any

Many writers in history have written science fiction novels and had great success with them, but only a few have been as enduring over time as Kurt Vonnegut's Slaughterhouse-Five. Slaughterhouse-Five is a personal novel which draws upon Vonnegut's experience's as a scout in World War Two, his capture and becoming a prisoner of war, and his witnessing of the fire bombing of Dresden in February of 1945 (the greatest man-caused massacre in history). The novel is about the life and times of a World War Two veteran named Billy Pilgrim. In Slaughterhouse-Five, Kurt Vonnegut uses structure and point of view to portray the theme that time is relative.

It makes it difficult to know what time is his “present”. While the narrator wants us to think that Billy is actually time traveling, there is actually evidence that these episode are really PTSD flashbacks. By pretending Billy is time traveling, though, the narrator gives us a first person perspective of how war and PTSD affect people. The episodes are so realistic that Billy believes he is time traveling. Billy’s first episode occurs in the second chapter while he is on the run with Roland Weary and the two scouts, “his attention began to swing grandly through the full arc of his life, passing into death, which was violet light” (pg.54). This is a powerful anti-war message because it show the terrible effect of war on an

Bob is now unable to comprehend what has just happened and is angered. This causes the friendship to become very tense and a conflict arises between the two.

Both Billy and Krebs lack confidence and courage to such an extreme that they cannot function. Krebs does not have the confidence to talk to girls and get to know them. He “liked to look at them” (pg.71) when they walked by his house, but he could not go and talk to them. This reflects how krebs in paralyzed into inaction. Billy is not confident with is body during the war or after the war. The

In literature authors always have a theme to their book. Typically, authors make use of elements in their book to paint the picture for the central theme. Kurt Vonnegut’s Slaughterhouse-Five is no exception to this norm. Slaughterhouse-Five uses symbolism to support the theme that free will may not exist.

Billy: You think I wuh-wuh-wuh-want to stay in here? You think I wouldn’t like a con-convertible and a guh-guh-girl friend? But did you ever have people l-l-laughing at you? No, because you’re so b-big and so tough! Well, I’m not big and tough. Neither is Harding. Neither is F-Fredrickson. Neither is Suh-Sefelt. Oh – oh,

Again, Matheson points out the problem immediately by saying, “the first… [problem] is encountered in the unusual opening chapter where Vonnegut, apparently speaking as himself, gives an account of the novel’s genesis that cannot help but strike us initially as being carelessly written”(Matheson 1). Matheson is not fond of Vonnegut’s work, he not only dislikes the fact that there is not a single meaning to the book, but also the creative and eccentric style Vonnegut used in writing Slaughterhouse-Five. Slaughterhouse-Five is semi-autobiographical; the first and the last chapters are written in first person, and there are many similarities between Vonnegut’s life, and Billy Pilgrim’s life. In the first chapter Vonnegut identifies himself as the author when he is speaking to his friend on the phone by saying, “‘Listen— ’I said, ‘I’m writing this book about Dresden’”(Vonnegut 4). Critics seem to dislike the use of first person and the identification of the author because it is “irrelevant…[and leads] nowhere”(Matheson 1). The first person point of view comes back in the last chapter when Vonnegut says, “Robert Kennedy, whose summer home is eight miles from the home I live in all year round, was shot two nights ago”(Vonnegut 210). Vonnegut uses first person not to be annoying to critics, but to remind the reader that he experienced all of the events in his book, “more or less”(Vonnegut

With this description, Vonnegut vastly distances Billy from the ideal, strong and mighty image of a soldier, yet Billy is a soldier nonetheless. Not only is this weak and ungracious character fighting and representing the honour of his country but also he is one of the few soldiers who survive the war; he outlives many of the other soldiers that could be considered better suited for war. Furthermore, Vonnegut compares Billy to a filthy flamingo, highlighting the distance that exists between society's soldier ideal, graceful and admirable, and the soldiers' reality, harsh and rampageous. In short, Billy is so far from what is expected that he “shouldn't even be in the Army” (51). However, Billy is not the only soldier in this ludicrous predicament. Vonnegut describes the entire Army as chaotic, confused and ludicrous:

Before there had been conflict between them, because Helen looked down on Billy for being a cripple, and Billy was hurt by how she treated him. In this exchange, we can see that Billy is realizing that this kind of rough talk is part of Helen’s personality. He realizes that he will have to accept this part of Helen and remember that it is her form of tough love. Helen is also learning in this exchange. She starts out being very harsh and almost cruel to Billy, however, she relents and begins speaking kinder.

In fact, the only reason he had reasons to believe in the phrase “So it goes,” is because he was unstuck in time, the bombing of dresden, and his life experiences such as the plane crash. Billy always thought of life as “simple” after the war. He explains decades of his life in just a sentence. He recovers, marries a woman, has children, and then becomes a wealthy optometrist. However, based off past descriptions of the war, I can infer that Billy was traumatized during it. The instance he had with the Lazzaro that promised to kill him, would also be traumatizing as well. “So it goes,” is a phrase that dismisses the idea of a perfect world, where no war occurs, and insists that war will happen, whether or not anyone tries to stop

While never a defeatist, Billy merely flows through his disjointed life without much heed to the event at hand. Billy realizes that he holds the power to create his own happiness and satisfaction out of life through appreciation of the present moment rather than contemplate the occurrence of past and future. Vonnegut develops Billy Pilgrim as a unique protagonist as a means of forcing the reader to question the application of free will upon society and gain a new perspective on the beauty of the present.

When he tells Billy that he needs to figure it out and snap out of it, Billy says, “ You guys go on without me. I’m all right” (Vonnegut 47). This just displays the hopelessness in Billy’s life. The war has driven him to lose touch with himself and not value his own life. This makes it very easy for a reader to feel empathy for Billy and get an idea of how war can really affect these men. Billy isn’t the only character that Vonnegut uses to depict the terrors of war.

In Slaughterhouse-Five the image portrayed of Billy being a fool raises questions of the difference between reality and illusion. His absurd statures, makes the readers question their own assumptions of soldiers in war, and therefore question war itself. The character of Billy is ridiculed from the beginning of the book, till the end, he is a sort of anti-hero. As a child Billy was funny looking and the book indicates that he grew to continue being the same way, “A spindly scarecrow over six feet in height”. Furthermore, calling him Billy which is short for William shows that he has never grown and is still just a child fighting a war, an absurd soldier, for an absurd war.