Analysis of Robin Hood Case

ROBIN HOOD In the years of King Richard the Lionheart (1189-1199) there lived a brave and intelligent man called Robin Hood. He was a feared outlaw, who loved liberty and hated oppression. He took the law into his own hands and robbed the rich to give to the poor. People loved him and thought of him as a justice-maker. In time he acquired a heroic reputation and came to represent the ideal of heroism of his age. Stories about him and his closest friends Friar Tuck, Little John, and Maid Marian may be found in the time. They say that Robin Hood and his companions lived in Sherwood Forest, near Nottingham. They were called the ‘merry men’ and used to wear green clothes, a particular shade of green, called

The organization of power within a corporation is a rigid dichotomy between centralization and decentralization. Substitute strategies can exist anywhere along the spectrum whether they are completely centralized, completely decentralized or somewhere in between. Though Cervus’ methods are substitutable, centralized policies have not proven to be nearly as successful in maintaining

The Adventures of Robin Hood (1938) tells a tale of thieves that behave more honorable than the nobles of their time. The bandits known as the Merry Men lead by a notorious thief and Errol named Robin Hood (Errol Flynn). He leads the Merry Men in treacherous deeds to steal from those who have the most in the land and give everything they take to lazy, scumbags, treacherous, poor people. They protect the helpless women and children from the noble knights and kings. This seems very confusing to most because the Merry Men are supposed to be the enemy of the righteous people. In this essay we are going to discuss the key notes of the Code of Chivalry to express why Robin Hood and his Merry Men are actually noble even though they are robbing and breaking the code.

Robin Hood faces a myriad of problems that can potentially influence the changes that are crucial for Robin’s organization, as well as affect the effectiveness of the insurrection. As the CEO of his organization, Robin has the

Truth be told, both authors made quite compelling arguments on both sides of the spectrum. However, Zinn made his argument more swaying, in my opinion. These nineteenth century entrepreneurs most definitely could be described as “robber barons.” I say this, in agreement with Zinn because of the fact that the owners of these corporations (namely Standard Oil and U.S. Steel) were able to monopolize the industrial revolution with government aids, as well. Let’s start with J.P. Morgan. Nothing gets more corrupt than the fact that Morgan purchased rifles for $3.50 from an army arsenal and then turned to a general to sell them for $22. Anything to make a quick buck, I guess. Now, back to the massive companies. These companies were able to make so much money by hiring outside (immigrant) labor for a fraction of what they would pay an American worker. They received government subsidies and were greatly benefitted by the tariffs

While it was commonly known by prior generations of Americans that businessmen such as Andrew Carnegie were ruthless regarding capitalistic ventures in the late 19th century. It is far more apparent to the current population the inherent value that men like Carnegie held in regards to the growth and development of American cities. The philanthropic ventures set forth by many of the robber barons, most notably Carnegie, proved to establish a societal standard for philanthropic contributions globally. The genuinely thought out humanitarian efforts propagated by Carnegie and facilitated by his foundation truly proved to be influential in the betterment of urban and agricultural communities

A thief considered a hero. He was an excellent archer. Robin Hood was a hero in his time. While many believe he was a thief and a villain to the law, others feel he was a hero to the poor. Some people might say that Robin Hood stole from the government, and stealing is a crime, no matter what your cause is. They might also say that if people in this day and time stole from the rich and gave the money to the poor, they would be arrested because stealing is against the law. Finally, people who think Robin Hood was wrong in what he did might say that he betrayed his country.

The growing size of the band is a good thing for Robin as the saying goes “there is strength in numbers” would be suitable here. With a numerous number of allies, uncontended men with a deep sense of justice, Robin had the loyalty and support of the people. A disciplined band, together as one to remove the sheriff, and willing to live against the law. The organization of the band was much more sophisticated than one would probably expect, also there were many lieutenants appointed for different jobs. Although the band was organized in a sophisticated manner it was however very simple in nature.

Human resources are so bad. Robin Hood imagined that it is a strength for the company but it causes problems in discipline. It is too hard to maintain discipline in the group. Also the growth of the band is exceeding the food provided by the forest .there is a problem in feeding forces. Millers son asked scarlot all-time about money to buy food from villages and markets. There is miscommunication between team members and disagreement between robin and merry men. So the dilemma occurred when the number of forces become huge and robin hood have problems in communicating and giving orders to the forces.

The ultimate goal of the Merrymen is to rid Nottingham of the crooked Sheriff. The only plan that will ultimately do this is to join with the Barons and free King Richard. This is a high risk – high reward option, but is the only one that could ultimately bring an end to the Sheriff and Prince John as well.

The organization has a tall structure with many hierarchical levels, resembling a system with a vertical functional design. There is a fairly narrow span of management with most important decisions being by either the board of trustees or the CEO. See Figure A in Appendix

Chapter Case Book Page Number Primary Secondary Primary Industry Company Robin Hood and His Merry Men Subdivision/ Subsidiary of Protagonist Sector NAICS Code N/A Robin Hood “Finance” and “Redistribution” N/A N/A Strategic analyst N/A Strategic analyst 1 Robin Hood C1

In addition, Robin Hood needs downsize and refocus in how to drive his organization evolving a new way of thinking as opposed to how it was. In addition, conspiracy to overthrow the Sheriff is too risky. Moreover, Robin must introduce geographic diversification and product diversification.

a. The Wallace Group suffers from moving back and forth from an entrepreneurial mode to adaptive mode in its decision making. This can be clearly seen from the early days of Harold Wallace running all three businesses, reacting to existing problems as they arise, to the more recent events of settling unresolved disputes between Corporate

The Merrymen’s dilemma is that they must overcome their largest competitor, the Sheriff, who is growing stronger and becoming better organized. The Sheriff has gained the money and men and is beginning to cause problems for the Merrymen, looking for their weaknesses. The Merrymen have several strategy options in order to triumph over the Sheriff. There are three approaches we will focus on to find a strategy