In the reading, Anti-Intellectualism: Why We Hate the Smart Kids, the Penrod recommends that there should be a different way to socialize amongst other individuals. The author guilt celebrates, ideas held as standard when communicating, and on the bandwagon get smart people worn down by the individuals that are against smart people. He says that those a lot of bad influence towards education and it's getting into effect. The author is afraid that people would not take the time out of their day to study for their classes or even read. Penrod’s argument may have several flaws, but overall it is effective because popular events getting more recognition than being educated, harmful social stereotypes begin to emerge as early as in high school, and making fun of intelligent people.
To begin with, Penrod’s argument may have several flaws, but overall it is effective because popular events getting more recognition than being educated.
…show more content…
They bring up hateful mentions about intellectuals and has no issue in doing such thing. According to the article, “The trend to dislike intellectuals stems at least in part from an inescapable perception that concern for grades and test scores excludes the coexistence of normal social activities.” In the author’s argument, discrimination against smart people thinks when you care most about your results in academics, there would be less time to be involved socially with others and any type of event. The less talkative you are the more intellect the person may be. I support that following the trend and bandwagon involves anti-intellectualism because of personal experiences with the people at my age group. Popularity is an important part of knowing that a person is going to get bullied or not and this is one of the main causes of
“The cult of ignorance in the United States: Anti-intellectualism and the "dumbing down" of America” is a editorial about the decrease importance in intellectuals. Anti-intellectualism is defined as a person who believes that intellect and reason are less important. This editorial was written by Ray Williams.
In today’s society, constant judgement as to how well you fit in achieves nothing, rather distinguishes hope for improvement. Ideas including being looked down upon for an individual’s intelligence or being pushed aside from groups due to one’s academic ability are becoming an epidemic as those who seek to better themselves are seen as inferiors. The United States today is accustomed to issues as far as the negative deterioration towards those who possess higher mental values. In America Needs Its Nerds by Leonid Fridman, a look into how geeks and nerds are identified, the reality of childhood dilemmas, and the problem in the broad spectrum of the globe are all noted and questioned as to why America as a society expresses such a negative position
The issue being debated in the article “Hidden Intellectualism” by Gerald Graff is street smarts versus book smarts. Gerald Graff is an English professor at the University of Illinois and has written many books. The author claims that people are better off if they are more street smart than book smart. The authors is very persuasive using real life examples. I although disagree with this claim. I think that you need an equal mix of both street and book smarts.
“There must be many buried or hidden forms of intellectualism that do not get channeled into academic work…” (Graff 22), this said by non-other than Gerald Graff himself within his article “Hidden Intellectualism”. This quote being his overall main point of the entire article. Graff meaning that students can be intellectual even if they feel like they aren’t a book smart student. Graff argues that students who are street smart could also be intellectual. Within Graff’s article, there are a few arguments he makes that I agree with but also a few that I disagree with. “Hidden Intellectualism” offers various points about how every student possesses intellectualism but it’s also possible that not every student possesses this trait.
Do you think intelligence is a fixed trait? If you do, then you might be one of many people with a fixed mind-set. In Carol S. Dweck’s an essay, “The Secret to Raising Smart Kids”, she describes fixed and growth mind-sets. She describes how they affect school, and how they affect social relationships as well. The two central ideas of “The Secret to Raising Smart Kids” are that fixed mind-sets can make a person shy away from a challenge and that growth mind-sets can be put into place by parents.
(Graff 199). In Graff’s own view however, he makes it clear that he sees street smarts as if
In the United States, there has been, and always will be a debate on education.While some feel it is very important and crucial to success, others feel it is unessential to our happiness and well being. Many assume that education and success are directly associated with intellectualism. In this essay, I will review the current trend in research on intellectualism, which many feel is to enforce pursuing a higher education, due to a common belief among the American people that those who do not receive a higher education are seemingly less intelligent. Research on this topic increasingly suggests that those who receive a higher education, tend to make more money, rating them as more successful in the eyes of
Academic work should not define intelligence nor should a job define ability; a person, regardless of grades, degrees, or job title, is an intellect. Together, Gerald Graff, a coauthor of They Say I say, professor, and former anti-intellect, author of "Hidden Intellectualism," and Mike Rose, professor, author, and in depth thinker, author of "Blue-Collar Brilliance," share two different perspectives on what an intellect truly is. Yet, both writings hold meaningful points and experiences to prove who qualifies to be an intellect. Society continuously focuses on what leads to a successful and rounded life: go to school, graduate, go back to school, get a degree, and then a job. It is believed that these high expectations of higher academics enables one to be more successful is correct; however, it is not. It is a person’s individual goals that give them the success they wish to have whether that be education, volunteering, or donating. Also, street smarts is not to be overlooked; a person with common sense can know more than a Doctor. Typically, a person can have either common sense or intelligence, not both. Street smarts is, without a doubt, a superior quality to possess as it encompasses more in life than just a degree does. For example, it is more appropriate to know how to cross a street properly in life than know how to perform a craniotomy. Furthermore, one does not gain knowledge and life lessons through school alone, but through experience,
In his article, Penrod first starts out talking about how a football team won an Arizona state championship the previous year. Penrod then goes on to talk about how no one paid any attention to the Science bowl team since everyone was focused on the athletes. Furthermore, Penrod points out how there is “disdain for the educated harbored in much of society,” and also speaks about stereotypes associated with intelligent kids and how uneducated celebrities are not setting a good example for future kids to get an education.
In the passage taken from “America Needs its Nerds” by Leonid Fridman, the author gives examples of how our society compares to others, regarding how they successfully treat intelligence as a gift, and we treat intelligence as a social inormality, ostracizing our nerds. He uses examples from schooling in America to universities in East Asia, to just different amounts of respect shown to different occupations (such as a university professor), in East Asia vs. America.
Gerald Graff’s essay “Hidden Intellectualism” refutes the age-old idea that ‘street smarts’ are anti-intellectual. Instead, Graff suggests that “schools and colleges are at fault for missing the opportunity to tap into such street smarts and channel them into academic smarts.” (244). In saying this, Graff argues that lacking book smarts does not render a person unintelligent. Rather, educational institutions need to find a way to effectively use this format of intellectualism to produce academic intelligence. Graff goes on to point out that society associates ‘weighty’ subjects, like Shakespeare, with intellectualism, but not less serious subjects, such as sports. In consideration of this omission on society’s part, Graff emphasizes to the
Anti-Intellectualism and society's overall decline Anti-intellectualism is an attitude that minimizes the value of intelligence, knowledge and curiosity. The death of thinking and anti-intellectualism is becoming a trend in American culture. The reason for this behavior is due to the ignorance of science, arts, and society and it's replacement by entertainment and ignorance. Wanting to learn new things isn't much of a trend and never was. Anti-intellectualism has became a tradition in America, unlike many other countries.
Education is an important part of almost every person 's life around the world and without it, we would struggle to develop as we mature into adults. America is currently the third most populated country around the world. With such a big population, it can be assumed that everyone undergoes a great education and graduates with a brain full of the greatest knowledge that everyone needs to know. While it can be true in some cases, other countries appear to be doing a much better job with educating students in recent years. In Ripley book, The Smartest Kids in the World, she claims that the education system in Poland has “dramatically improved its results in just a few years" despite saying that Poland has "a thousand good reasons for why it should fail" (Ripley 127). The major question is how did it improve in such little time unlike American education which still has problems? It 's a shaky claim due to Poland 's potential flaws but it reminds me that their education has vastly improved over American education in a short period of time due to the heavy focus on specific subjects, the lack of distraction for students, and the fact that other countries have succeeded with similar education systems.
What is Anti-Intellectualism? According to Dictionary.com, Anti-Intellectualism is defined as being hostile toward intellectuals and the modern academic, artistic, social, religious worlds as well as other theories that are associated with them. Although Richard Hofstadter’s Anti-Intellectualism in American Life won the 1964 Pulitzer Prize, it is now almost fifty-fives out of date. Not to mention the ideas within the book are seen as suggesting a type of self-defensive justification rather than an actual deep investigation. Hoftstader used the aftermath of McCarthyism and how there were wide range witch hunts among the academics and progressives and how that is influenced by the reform, socialists and communist movements between the World Wars. Applying McCarthyism, Hoftstader looks at the tension from four different perspectives: religion, politics, business, self-help culture, and education. Taking into consideration the year the book was written, each angle is explored from the colonial period up until the 1950s. Throughout the introduction, Hofstadter makes it clear that the purpose of the book is to shed a little light on our cultural problems. Focusing on the social and political phenomenon of “anti-intellectualism” Hofstadter applies broad abstractions to social issues. He explains how applications of the abstracts presented by intellectuals can ultimately pose a threat to the social and political ambitions of certain and specific individuals. Because of this,
in my own opinion i think people value doing things more than intellectualism. Why do I say this because now days everyone is dumb, people would