Why Are American Companies Become Too Large To Fail?

Unfortunately, the improvements in earnings and loan losses have not extended to Banks’ operating revenues. Banks’ operating revenues are not growing due to “lower servicing income (down $8 billion), reduced gains on loan sales (down $4.8 billion), and lower income from service charges on deposit accounts, which fell by $2.1 billion (5.9 percent).” (FDIC Quarterly, p.2)

The financial industry had gone to several crises through the decades. Around 2008, Alex Preston notice that the investments banking industry was in a crisis. Big banks were closing its doors or selling out to other companies. As it was the case of the National City Corp.; the first ever American’s mortgage maker had to close its doors after taking a large amount of proprietary risk. Other big financial companies like Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, to avoid having to go down the same way, became bank holding companies, which means that these companies could receive emergency federal funds.

The largest six publically traded banks in the United States who are FDIC insured account for seventy-eight percent of the market, while the top four account for sixty-eight percent of the market. These top six banks include: Wells Fargo and Company, JPMorgan Chase and Company, Bank of American, Citigroup, US Bancorp, and PNC Financial Services. Wells Fargo, the market share leader, holds over twenty-percent of the market with JPMorgan Chase falling just under twenty percent (Oja, 2015). The top four banks as listed above, accounted for almost half of the revenue, at nearly two hundred and eighteen billion dollars. The top eight banks, of the eighty-one, managed an astonishing seventy-five percent of the total revenue for all banks (Oja, 2015). These other two banks were Branch Banking and Trust Corporation (BB&T) and SunTrust Banks and the total revenue in 2014 were at four hundred and forty-three billion dollars. Specifically, as of 2014, JPMorgan Chase

Before the advent of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) in 1933 and the general conception of government safety nets, the United States banking industry was quite different than it is today. Depositors assumed substantial default risk and even the slightest changes in consumer confidence could result in complete turmoil within the banking world. In addition, bank managers had almost complete discretion over operations. However, today the financial system is among the most heavily government- regulated sectors of the U.S. economy. This drastic change in public policy resulted directly from the industry’s numerous pre-regulatory failures and major disruptions that produced severe economic and social

However, it is clear that these unethical practices served as catalyzers of the financial crisis. Even though many financial institutions that could be held responsible for the 2008 crisis no longer exist and that legislation, as the Dodd-Frank, has been passed in order to further regulate financial institutions, many of the institutions responsible for the crisis are still in the core of the economy, controlling a very big part of it. It might be impossible for the general public to fight against a possible future recession, as the power of an individual is close to insignificant in comparison to the power of an established financial

Bank of America is one of the largest banks in the nation. It is a multinational company and it is recognized by its high revenue value. Unfortunately, Bank of America has endured many complaints and harsh views regarding their lack of ethics. Ethical issues occur when there is a blatant disregard to implement integrity, trust, and responsibility. In some financial institutions, ethical matters are displayed in the way the consumers are treated. Within the past nine years, Bank of America has diminished all of their ethical promises by revealing customer information without their permission; discriminating against consumers based on their race; and manipulating overdraft fees in order to benefit the bank. In order to assess these problems, it is vital to recognize what Bank of America claims to stand for and determine where their most concerning issues are generated from.

The problem for banks is that they now can’t use that small percentage of low yielding assets to turn a profit on, and this makes them very sad. You see, bank CEOs don’t really care if their banks fail and millions of American are left in a lurch due to a lack of this protection. They simply want to make as much profit as possible and let the potential carnage to the markets be damned – that’s because the executives of a bank can walk away with all their money, while leaving a decimated stock market behind.

The aim of this bill is to reduce the risk in various aspects of the US financial system. The law also created government agencies, such as the Financial Stability Oversight, Orderly Liquidation Authority, and Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). These agencies are tasked to monitor the performance of companies considered as “too big to fail” to prevent serious

By allowing banks to become “too big to fail”, the failure of one leads to massive repercussions for the entire economy. In a contrasting environment where many small institutions exist, the implosion of one bank will not have this far-reaching, catastrophic impact. In recent years, reforms have taken place that limit a company’s ability to be “too big to fail”. In the aftermath of the financial crisis of 2008, measures to revitalize the financial system included the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protect Act of 2010, named after U.S Senator Christopher J. Dodd and U.S Representative Barney Frank. The Act aimed to increase regulation and transparency in an industry that had so clearly lacked them and minimize future risk in the

In September of 2016, it was revealed that there was alleged misconduct at one of the largest and safest banking institutions in the United States. Wells Fargo Bank was ranked among the nation’s safest financial institutions according to an analysis done by Global Financial, (Inside Tucson Business, 2009). Alleging that between May 2011 and July 2015, there were more than 2 million bank accounts or credit cards opened for customers without their knowledge or permission (Blake, 2016). Clients started complaining the they were receiving debit/credit cards from the bank that they had not ordered. Wells Fargo employees also started complaining that about the unethical behaviors they witnessed or were asked to participate in to the Human Resource Departments, the bank’s internal ethics hotline, branch’s individual managers and supervisors. All which led to the discovery of the fraud scandal.

Banks have been at the forefront of the financial system for as long as they have existed and have captured the attention of stakeholders on both controversial grounds as well as being undisputed with regards to the many helpful services they provide. JP Morgan & Chase is one such bank, surrounded by hostile news articles and excessive scrutiny but rightfully so as it has of recent been the topic of much controversy as turning a blind eye to the moral codes established by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and assisting Ponzi Scheme masterminds in swindling unsuspecting investors.

However, after five years of the financial crisis happened in 2008, is the “too big to fail” problem being solved or controlled? Jim Puzzanghera who published his article on Los Angeles Times insists that banks considered too big to fail are even bigger now. Puzzanghera provides his opinion based on the data he collected, “Just before the financial crisis hit, Wells Fargo & Co. had $609 billion in assets. Now it has $1.4 trillion. Bank of America Corp. had $1.7 trillion in assets. That's up to $2.1 trillion.” Puzzanghera explores that one main concern of coming out with a solution to this “too big to fail” problem is that Democrats and Republicans rarely reach an agreement on the problem. Most Democrats are willing for the federal authority to seize the power and to get rid of the firms if they are too big to fail while most Republicans do not want to force the banks to shrink. In stead of regulating those big financial firms, “the government's new power to seize large financial firms teetering near collapse could result in them being rescued instead of shut down, in effect enshrining

In this essay I will be addressing the “Too Big To Fail” (TBTF) problem in the current banking system. I will be discussing the risks associated with this policy, and the real problems behind it. I will then examine some solutions that have been proposed to solve the “too big to fail” problem. The policy ‘too big to fail’ refers to the idea that a bank has become so large that its failure could cause a disastrous effect to the rest of the economy, and so the government will provide assistance, in the form of perhaps a bailout/oversee a merger, to prevent this from happening. This is to protect the creditors and allow the bank to continue operating. If a bank does fail then this could cause a domino effect throughout

There are various government structures in organizations although they are different from one branch of the government to the other. The structures help the government manage its economy efficiently. In the economy a too big to fail firm (TBTF) exists and it is defined as one that its complexity, size, critical functions, and interconnections are in the sense that in case the firm goes into liquidation unexpectedly, the rest of the economy and financial system will face severe consequences. The government provides support to TBTF companies not because they favor them but because they recognize implications for an advanced economy of allowing a disorderly failure outweighs the cost of avoiding the failure. Helping the TBTF firms enable the economy to realize high revenue. Various activities are to prevent their failure. They include providing credit, facilitating a merger, or injecting the capital of the government. The paper addresses the structures of the administration and the concept of too big to fail in financial and non-financial institutions plus the ethics involved with the theory.

Banking is designed to make it possible for customers to trade, commercialize and invest. It can be regarded as a service to serve the public and prompt the economy (Rosenthal, 2013). There has been much debate concerning whether big banks should be broken up. The collapse of five biggest investment banks in the financial crisis of 2008 has put an increasing number of countries such as Iceland, Ireland and Spain at the edge of bankruptcy (Rosenthal, 2013) and resulted in mass unemployment and a decrease in living standards. It is clear that although large banks perform invaluable functions in economies of scale and scope, providing unique services which are not accessible elsewhere, they also know they are “too big to fail”(hereafter TBTF) for bail-outs provided by governments; therefore, they continue to take excessive risks for higher compensation, which could have a negative influence on the forming of a competitive and stable market. In this essay, I will look at the causes and consequences of the financial crisis and then argue that those reforms proposed are insufficient to reduce the risks of systemic collapse; Thus, these financial sectors should become small enough to be allowed to fail so that they have to consider carefully before taking excessive risks.