preview

Argument Against Biosafety Levels

Better Essays

When dangerous diseases like Ebola and the Zika virus infect large populations of people and becomes a threat to public health, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) takes the lead in responding to them. Microbes that fall into the highest level of containment – Biosafety Levels (BSL) three and four – are easily transmissible in the air with little or no treatment available (CDC, “Recognizing Biosafety Levels”). To fight against such threats, the CDC conducts critical research to “track and find what is making people sick and the most effective ways to prevent it” (CDC, “Mission, Role, and Pledge”). However, in 2014, news reports emerged of the CDC accidentally sending live samples of Ebola to a lower level facility and discovering forgotten vials of smallpox in a cardboard box in a facility owned by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (Young and Penzenstadler, “Inside America’s secretive biolabs”). The CDC is reknowned for successfully eradicating diseases like smallpox and polio, but these incidents damage the reputation of the agency because workers did not follow biosafety protocol. Violations of biosafety, or precautions taken to reduce the risk of infecting laboratory workers and …show more content…

With a regulatory committee in place, they have more authority to conduct investigations, quickly file accurate incident reports, and enforce biosafety guidelines thus limiting the CDC’s ineffective self-regulation. Instead of letting an unapproved study continue, the committee should reject the study and deliver disciplinary action. Moreover, the committee can also hold health officials accountable for spending funds on lavish furnitures instead of investing them in disease research. As a result, Congress and the public will get a clearer picture about what happens inside research

Get Access