Argumentative Essay On Gun Control

Gun control laws do not deter crime; gun ownership deters crime. A Nov. 26, 2013 study found that, between 1980 and 2009, "assault weapons bans did not significantly affect murder rates at the state level" and "states with restrictions on the carrying of concealed weapons had higher gun-related murders." While gun ownership doubled in the twentieth century, the murder rate decreased. John R. Lott, Jr., PhD, author of More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws, stated, "States with the largest increases in gun ownership also have the largest drops in violent crimes... The effect on 'shall-issue' [concealed gun] laws on these crimes [where two or more people were killed] has been dramatic. When states passed these laws, the number of multiple-victim shootings declined by 84 percent. Deaths from these shootings plummeted on average by 90 percent and injuries by 82 percent." A Dec. 10, 2014 Pew survey found that 57% of people believe that owning a gun protects

Sandy Hook Elementary. Aurora, Colorado. San Bernardino, California. Las Vegas, Nevada. Orlando, Florida. (Words with Negative Connotation) These are just some of the biggest mass shootings that have swept America in the past few years. Hundreds of lives are lost each year to gun related violence in the United States alone. Gun control has been a topic in our country since our founding fathers adopted the second amendment to the US constitution. Although recently controversy has sparked to an all-new extent in America due to the recent spike in mass shootings and gun related homicides. So many families and loves ones are affected each year in the United States because of gun related violence and other mass killing events, because of these events gun control laws need to be revamped and strengthened in American in order to protect the citizens.

Only 2 percent of the guns that criminals have used are obtained through purchase from the gun show according to the Department of Justice of U.S. These ones were purchased by persons legally who went through the background checks successfully (Spitzer 47).

Brian Jenkins (1998) offers a practical solution to the problem: terrorists are not typical criminals. They commit crimes for political purposes. When captured by security forces, they are not usually prosecuted as terrorists but charged with the crimes they commit. Terrorists strike targets for political purposes in a given situation, using crime as an incidental tactic. When terrorists cross national boundaries, they become international terrorists. Furthermore, terrorists are not exceptionally creative; they use a limited array of weapons and tactics.

According to an article evaluated from Kovandizic and Marvell, each year in America we can see the most violent crimes have been committed using firearms. “In 2000 firearms were involved in 66% of homicides, 26% of robberies, 6% of aggravated assaults, and 8% of all violent crime victims faced

However, many of these beliefs are based on nonfactual evidence and, in fact, are quite false. Perhaps, one of the greatest myths believed today by this debate is attempts to ban the possession of handguns, or certain kinds of guns, are a viable option for reducing crime. It has often been proposed more guns mean more deaths and therefore, fewer guns would equate to fewer deaths. Unfortunately, these thoughts are all too often

What is gun control? Who is affected by Gun Control? Why should someone care about Gun Control? Imagine going to a concert with your friends and family, you guys are laughing and having a good time when all of sudden someone starts shooting up the place. Are you thinking to yourself that if guns were banned this wouldn't have never happened? Or are you wishing you had a gun to protect everyone from what is happening? Gun Control has been an issue since the beginning of time, there are some people who think we need it and others who say we have the right to bear arms. With gun control a lot more lives could be saved and people won't have to be scared of a mass shootings happening somewhere. Kids can feel safe when going to school and they won’t have to worry about one of their class mates shooting up the school.

Gun control laws can not hinder crime, gun ownership does. A 2013 study discovered that, from 1980 to 2009, “assault weapon” bans had

Firearms are the cause of death for more than 31,000 people per year, making it the 2nd leading cause of death for people ages 15-24 (National Center for Injury Control and Prevention). As the debate over gun control continues to spread throughout the nation like the plague, everyone is trying to choose a side. Some argue that their Second Amendment Rights are being infringed on, however, when looked at in detail that is not the case. Many others argue the regulation of guns is not beneficial because criminals are okay with doing illegal things, therefore they will obtain guns anyway. There is much, however, to disprove that. These weapons are the reason why the United States has such a high rate of violence even with such high wealth. Criminals should not have the access they currently have to such destructive weapons. Gun control must be put in place in order to decrease much of the violence and death by firarem that the United States has.

Many small deaths such as Raymond Howell from mckinney texas and mass murders such as orlando florida's homosexual club shooting have occurred under the influence of guns. Guns have destroyed many lives. These deaths should not have occurred, With stricter gun control these unjustified murders would not have occurred and affect the lives of families. Gun control in America should be more restrictive because women will feel more protected from abusers, lower criminals with guns, unjustified gun deaths.

As deciding to what topic I would choose to write a research paper on, the choice was quite simple. The major topic of many discussions today are about guns, gun control and how deadly they can be. The question at hand in my book is simple, are guns bad or are people bad? I believe that legal citizens, who can pass a background check with no prior felonies, should be entitled to the right to purchase and obtain a firearm. With that being said, there are quite a few loopholes in the current system. I tend to use the reference of drugs as an example. Drugs are illegal for anyone to purchase, but when an addict wants a fix they always have an ample supply from a local drug dealer. If guns do eventually get banned in the United

With this mindset, there has been a greater emphasis on collecting intelligence on possible terror attacks and the prevention of, or the response to, these types of attacks. One part of this intelligence process is understanding what targets are valuable to terrorists and why, and not worrying to heavily about why the terrorists are attacking in the first place. “Local police cannot hope to deal with these distant causes; but by focusing on the four pillars of terrorist opportunity—targets, weapons, tools, and facilitating conditions—all of which are accessible to intervention, police can control the opportunities for terrorist action and planning. This means that the opportunities for terrorist exploitation must be identified at the local level where actions can be taken to reduce these opportunities. ” By collecting intelligence on terrorists, their potential targets and the possible effects of these attacks, those responsible for countering and responding to terrorism can better prepare themselves, and those they are responsible to, for these attacks. Some of the possible ways to attack U.S. citizens are nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons, along with explosives, firearms, and even automobiles. Intelligence can be collected at the Federal, state, and local levels, but needs to be shared also. With proper dissemination of

Some studies indicate that gun restrictions did not significantly decrease crime rates while gun ownership rates doubled

Terrorism activities have increased these past few years due to faulty decisions made by governments when dealing with terrorists. Many have made the mistake of compromising with terrorists, which makes them appear weak and targetable, which only sponsors future terrorist acts. The

Terrorist activity is no longer limited to direct physical attacks on the state in order to achieve their cause and as will be explored further in this essay, threats to national security are evolving into more indirect methods in order to undermine the nation’s well-being.