Argumentative Essay On Henry Carson

In 17 chapters, many of which can stand alone as essays, Carson develops a deceptively simple premise: the use and overuse of synthetic chemicals to control insect pests introduces these chemicals into the air, water, and soil and into the food chain where they poison animals and humans, and disrupt the many intricate

Besides hard-hitting statistics and real-world examples, Carson’s book includes the overarching theme of the relationship between mankind and nature. In a world so connected, she argues, our ability to change the environment around us must be treated with extreme caution. I hold the belief that nations should embrace science and the scientific method wholeheartedly as a way to improve the means by which we live and treat the environment. In my own book, I reference the fact that “science alerts us to the perils introduced by our world-altering

She speaks of the nature’s beauty in the town and the animals in it. Then evil invades the town and slowly begins killing off small animals. Suddenly no one ever sees any type of birds, squirrels, or even bees. Chickens no longer hatch, and cattle grow sick. Even the farmers talk about the illnesses in their families. Carson goes on to say this town does not exist but could be our future if we continue to use the dangerous chemicals we so vigorously throw out. She states that the most hazardous thing mankind can do is corrupt the air thus corrupting the water and soil along with it. She speaks of the time it took the world to fully become balanced. Carson states that “man undoes the built-in checks in balances by which nature holds the species within bounds,” meaning we should not ruin the environment by continuing to use a toxin that is killing not just the nature around us but us humans as well. Carson also writes about how not just pesticides, but poisonous herbicides can also attract animals to eat foods they do not normally eat. This affects humans in the same way that the pesticides do slowly creeping up the food chain until it sickens children and

To a certain degree, Carson’s writing is charitable to those it criticizes. Carson explains the pesticides notably DDT and a group of related insecticides that came into wide use after WWII. I think she has some charity but lacks much of it. She acknowledges the various reasons the insecticides are used because she says they are used to effectively controlling insects that damaged food crops, transmit diseases, and were just large pests to human society. She sort of emphasizes that she did not write the book to discredit the chemical pesticide industry but to inform people about the unintended consequences that came with the use of pesticides. She explains the situation, giving the opposing view (the reason the pesticides are used), but she

The use of the pesticide had increased greatly since 1945. By 1958, Carson was no doubt the best-selling author, and the fact that she could not acquire an assignment to write about DDT is expressive of how out-there and debatable her views on the subject must have seemed. Having already assembled a large quantity of research on the subject, however, Carson decided to go ahead and address the issue in a

After World War II American’s really advanced technologically, meaning everything went along with it like pesticides and herbicides. Scientist discovered that they could alter compounds easily in a lab, making a variety of new “harmless” pesticides. Carson does not approve of these advances solely for the reason that the products being produced and used are exactly what they are saying, which is harmless. In every case that a pesticide or a herbicide was used, it did its job while harming organisms that were supposed to have no affect to the chemicals. Side effects were something that was expected to occur if exposed to doses of these chemicals. When DDT was used in war to help aid against lice for our soldiers, we believed that since no immediate

“The idea that nature can harm us is not new. Have you ever heard of malaria, HIV, tuberculosis, botulism or tetanus? Why, then, are so many convinced that anything and everything natural is healthier for us than synthetic products? It 's true that modern chemistry has brought us a number of toxic chemicals, like DDT and dioxins, but do you really think that nature 's chemicals are any less

MAIN NAME SHEET David Carson was born in Texas in the United States. Many of his design influences have come from his early childhood while travelling around America, Puerto Rico and the West Indies. His first significant exposure to graphic design education came as part of a three-week workshop in Switzerland, where the Swiss graphic designer Hans-Rudolph Lutz influenced him. He then worked in a high school near San Diego from 1982 to 1987. During this time he also carried highly experimental graphic design as the art director of the magazine Transworld Skateboarding. Among his abilities of art directing, graphic designing and film directing, he was also a professional surfer. His immense interest in the surfing culture

People have been abusing the environment for too long. Americans should not use chemicals without researching and considering serious consequences. Rachel Carson, an aquatic biologist who helped shape the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, wrote an article about the damage chemicals are having on the earth. She presented a great point that most damage Americans are causing to the earth cannot be reversed. These chemicals are left in the air or in the ground for generations (Carson 50). Americans should use environmentally friendly pesticides to reduce pollution and improve human and animal health.

In Chapter 8 (And No Birds Sing) Carson cites observations at Michigan State University where “Dead and dying robins began to appear in the campus. Few birds were seen in their normal foraging activities or assembling in their usual roosts.” due to the spraying of DDT on the university’s trees. In Chapter 12 (The Human Price) Carson cites another study done at the University of Melbourne where people exposed to these lethal chemicals experienced “impairment of memory to schizophrenic and depressive reactions. All had normal medical histories before the chemicals they were using boomeranged and struck them down.” Together these chapters help to prove Carson’s overall claim because they are able to explain how humanity’s reliance on pesticides are “silencing” species and destroying the environment.

Through reading the two texts it is clear that the two authors are on the same page on the effects the human race has on the environment. Although over the course of history humans have not always had the same impact on the environment, This is the issue that both authors seem to be very concerned with. The alarming rate at which these so called “negative” impacts the human race is enforcing on the environment is increasing seemed to be a focal point in both passages. Carson used somewhat of a statistical approach in parts of her reading to emphasize the impact that man made chemicals are having on the environment. In talking about the number of chemicals created by humans each year Carson says “almost five hundred annually find their way into actual use in the United States alone.” She adds “since the 1940’s over 200 basic chemicals have been created for use in killing insects, weeds, rodents and other organisms.” (Carson, 1962, ch.2). In doing this she is trying to grab the reader's attention

The environmental message of the book is that the unscrupulous proliferation of pesticides and hazardous chemicals is a threat to our natural environment and to human existence itself. Chapter by chapter, Carson clearly articulates this argument, explaining the dangers of expanding chemical use. Her message can be divided into several sections. First, she explains the problem of chemical pesticides and discusses the impacts of pesticides on environmental factors. Second she addresses their impact on living organisms (i.e. plants and animals). Third, she explores the human health impacts of pesticides. Finally, she contends that pesticides actually have the opposite of their desired effect and proposes an alternative to the toxic chemicals.

As the world changes everyday, pollution and global warming have taken effect on everyday lives. In “The Obligation to Endure”, Carson uses logos to show that pollution is undeniably fatal to all living things on Earth by saying, “Along with the possibility of the extinction of mankind by nuclear war, the central problem for

According to European Charter on Environmental and health, Environmental health includes human health and disease that occurs or get affected from environmental factors such as social, physical, chemical, biological or psychosocial. I totally agree with this definition as it has effectively explained that not a single factor is responsible for the ill outcomes pertaining to environment but multifactor plays a crucial role and according to my perspectives, drastic use of pesticides in agriculture is one of the serious environmental degradation practice.

To begin with, there are many types of dangerous chemicals we use daily that affect our environment in a negative way. Washing into our water sources, infecting our once pure soil, and harming the wildlife. Farmers use these deadly chemicals to attack the bugs that harm the crops, which has the same effect as a nuclear weapon has on the environment. Rachel Carson states that, “the