Argumentative Essay On The Death Penalty

The death penalty is supposed to deter murder and bring the justice that the murder families of the victims should be rewarded (Hyden). Although many scientific researches can conclude that it does not deter murder and the members of the murder victims’ family have rejected/rejecting the program because it retraumatizes them with long process of trials, appeals, and of course the media (Hyden). In contrast, a sentence of life in prison is certain and instant, allowing the families to move on knowing that the justice of the crime is being served. Comparing whether or not the death penalty should be legalized, the reasons as to why it shouldn’t be, are strong enough to change one person’s mind. The death penalty still should be illegal in the United States.

The death penalty in the U.S. is a very serious concern still to this day. Capital punishment is the same exact thing as the death penalty, it is a governed sanctioned practice to put a person to death. The death penalty effects all people whether it be because of the crime the person committed to receive the death penalty or the person’s family. This is a major controversy in the U.S. because some people think that you should not put a person to death or keep them locked up for doing something that is not a norm. While others believe that you must have some type of punishment so that people will be more likely to not commit a horrible crime. When people do commit egregious crimes, like murder or rape, they are to be punished by law if proven

Life is sacred. This is an ideal that the majority of people can agree upon to a certain extent. For this reason taking the life of another has always been considered the most deplorable of crimes, one worthy of the harshest available punishment. Thus arises one of the great moral dilemmas of our time. Should taking the life of one who has taken the life of others be considered an available punishment? Is a murderer's life any less sacred than the victim's is? Can capital punishment, the death penalty, execution, legal murder, or whatever a society wishes to call it, be morally justifiable? The underlying question in this issue is if any kind of killing, regardless of reason, can be accepted. In this

Since its earliest inception, society has always had in place some form of public accountability, rules, and in some cases, punishment, in hopes to dissuade would-be offenders from perpetrating any number of offenses. It has been a verdict applied to a variety of crimes ranging from the abandonment of soldiers during periods of war, to that of appalling crimes perpetrated by serial killers. Capital punishment has been characterized by some as brutal, disgusting, abnormal, and unnecessary. (1) While some argue for its continued existence, the judgment of death, according to some, violates the constitutional ban and is an application of cruel and unusual punishment, since it

The death penalty has both supporters and non-supporters. The following essay will not solve the issue; I will only try to persuade the reader to understand my point of view. The death penalty is justified in certain cases such as Mcveigh Vs State of Indiana; however it is unjustified in other cases, including Bloodsworth Vs State of Maryland. The death penalty is a must, especially in today’s society. With the increase in vicious crimes today, the government must act just as harsh with our justice system to try and prevent these types of crimes. Non-supporters argue that the death penalty is inhumane and should be considered murder. People of this malicious caliber must be dealt with in the same way, an eye for an eye. Putting these

A man who spent nearly 25 years on death row for the kidnapping, rape and murder of a 15-year-old girl has been executed in Missouri.

“The issue moved onto a front burner in July 1997 when Dieter's group published a report claiming that 69 innocent persons had been freed from death rows since the reinstitution of capital punishment in the United States in 1976.” (Jost) The death penalty can be faulty. Some also say that there’s no point in putting someone to death. Revenge, anger and hate will never cure the sadness of a lost loved one. They believe that it doesn’t change the fact that crime the suspect committed can never be fixed. What’s done is done, and it can’t be taken back. Also different types of people like the mentally ill or juveniles get treated differently when it comes to the death penalty. Sick people and children should not be executed. The death penalty applies differently towards different people; For Example the United States has executed more juvenile offenders -- 160 -- than any nation since 1973. (Cooper) Most who agree with capital punishment follow the old Bible teaching, “An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, and a life for a life.” Support for the capital punishment is strong in the U.S. “64% express support for the death penalty” (McCarthy) according to the recent Gallup Poll. People believe that anyone who takes another’s life away deserves to have their life taken. Many believe that the system serves as a form of justice allowing suspect to “get what they deserve.” Many people think that the families of the victims should be able to see the murderer suffer just as their loved ones

Imagine someone has just been found guilty of committing a crime and is sentenced to death. You don’t know if they are innocent or guilty, but you have to execute them. You can hang them, gas them, inject them with poison or electrocute them- take your pick. The accused struggles against the tight belts that cross his recently shaved chest, groin, legs and arms but it is useless. He cries out for forgiveness, his blindfold dampening knowing what is to come. You pull the leaver and watch as the prisoners flesh turns bright red and swells and stretches to the point of breaking. His eyeballs roll out of his sockets and rest on his cheeks while his body convulses, shaking all over. Blood streams from his mouth, urine runs down his leg, and the

The Death Penalty has been a long standing part of the American justice system. For many years, the death penalty went without opposition, but as of recently it has gained it’s long overdue mass opposition. The Death Penalty is barbaric, and is costing our nation obscene amounts of money. While one would think that modern-day American citizens would have done away with this method, a good portion of Americans reason that it lowers the crime rate and it provides closure (or rather vengeance) to families of victims.

Dieter, Richard C. "Millions Misspent: What Politicians Don't Say About the High Costs of the

As in any other debate this is the other side of the coin, the supporters those who are in favor of capital punishment. They believe that the death penalty is absolutely necessary because it is a form of prevent crime. Also, they said that the death penalty honors human being self-esteem by treating the criminal as a free moral character in the life story able to control his own destiny for good or for bad.

The death penalty is a cruel barbaric treatment practiced in many countries. It has influenced the United States to use more than any other country. It has been used in the eighteenth century and is currently being performed today in some states. There are five different methods of execution that will lead the perpetrator to an intensifying and painful death. This treatment should be banished and the system should find an alternate route to serve justice. According to Teh Anget’s Pro Death Arguments on Youtube, he believes there are a few valid reasons this treatment should be put into action in our society, and the other reasons are not as significant but I disagree.

Even when a crime isn't done in front of you it still happens somewhere. One person is murdered every minute, meaning 60 individuals are murdered within a hour (Holguin). The death penalty is a punishment ment only to be rid of criminals whom have committed a crime, mostly murder. The criminal can meet their end in various ways: hanging, lethal injection, shooting, and electrocution. The death penalty should stay because it will deter crime, it's constitutional, and it follows the 'eye for an eye' law code.

Capital punishment is the government practice of punishing a criminal by execution that dates back to the 18th century, however times were very different back then. Nowadays, the death penalty is carried out by lethal injection and in some states the electric chair, while in the early years of this practice it was hanging, stoning, being torn apart, etc. Some crimes that are punishable in Florida by the death penalty are First-degree murder; felony murder; capital drug trafficking; and capital sexual battery. Pennsylvania was the first state to move capital punishment out of the public eye and into correctional facilities. William Kemmler lived in New York and was the first person in the United States to receive the death penalty in 1890 for the murder of his wife with an ax. As mentioned, the electric chair was a form of capital punishment and when the first electric shock was delivered to Kemmler at approximately 700 volts, he did not die right away. A second shock was needed at 1,030 volts for two minutes, afterwards there were clear signs that Kemmler was deceased. Doctors then stated after the execution that they would have been better off using an ax instead of the electric chair. Over the years the death penalty has been a very controversial topic. Some say that this should be illegal and abolished while others state it is more effective than life in prison.

Capital punishment is beneficial to the community. It provides the society with a sense of security. The death penalty contains a positive influence on the future. A heavily debated topic is, “Does capital punishment deter people more than a life sentence to prison?” An explanation on why will be covered later. An issues many people have with capital punishment, is when it is just or not just. This is a topic many stray away from, because it is difficult to decide. Finding the right consequence for an action is difficult. While this paper is for the use of capital punishment, it is clearly not needed for every crime, or even every murder. Overusing capital punishment, such as using it for every murder, will negatively impact the country, and not using it has the same effect.