Capital Punishment : Is It Necessary?

The death penalty is a lot like the statement “crying over spilled milk” in the sense that it is pointless and makes no real difference with regards to the situation. The death penalty was created as a punishment for crimes committed, but even from the beginning crime was still a problem and the punishment was not a deterrent. The history concerning the death penalty is extensive and can be found documented all the way back to Ancient Babylon in 18th Century BC (Reggio). It was used as punishment for a variety of crimes varying from place to place and was, in some instances, used as the punishment for all crimes. In every one of the places and time spans where the death penalty was implemented crime was still present. Criminals were not deterred by the threat of death even then and today is no different. If someone wants to commit a crime badly enough, not even death can change their mind.

Many people often debate over the legitimacy over capital punishment, whether or not a person can receive the death penalty as a punishment if he or she commits an act of murder. Some argue that the death penalty is a justly act against dangerous criminals while others argue that the penalty is immoral, playing the role of God, and does not even lower the crime rate one bit. In fact, the death penalty is a severe punishment with some negative outcomes at times, but overall, it was placed in this world to serve the sole purpose of protecting our people from violent and dangerous deviants. When used properly, just for cases in which the murder or crime was so heinous, justice is being served for the

Proponents of the death penalty also view it as a deterrent to crime. (“Same old”, 1990). Just by having the possible punishment of death as an end result to a heinous crime has lowered the murder rate in some states. The feeling is that the more executions you have, the lower the homicide rate you will have. Not to mention the innocent lives you will save. Supporters of capital punishment will cite studies showing that murderers who are allowed to live will inevitably kill again. Studies have shown that murderers awaiting their death penalty sentence to be carried out have killed correction officers, knowing there could be no additional fate assigned to them.

Joe Messerli states, Capital punishments costs nearly 2-5 times more than life in prison without the chance of parole. The extra cost to capital cases become outrageous, making the Death Penalty highly looked against. The Death penalty should substituted with a better sanction.

A second reason why is the death penalty should be used is, it cost less than life in prison, stating the death penalty cost “at least $2 million a case.” Whereas life without parole will cost “$1.2 million-$3.6 million” which is more than equal a death sentence. In a sense keeping a person in jail for life is worst “because most of the time he will appeal just as much as many costs as a convict under the death sentence.” (Death Penalty Cost, 2017). Not only the death sentence is cost-effective but is better off than keeping the convict in jail for life.

Just like everything that deals with people’s morals and ethical views there are people who agree and disagree with what is and is not ethical. The death penalty is one of these things that people cannot agree whether it is ethical to do or not. My article focuses on how big names in politics feel about capital punishment and whether they stand for it or not. Capital punishment is when someone commits a horrible crime they can be put on death row, and then they will be killed as punishment for the crime that they have committed. Before reading this article I was not very educated on the current issues and aspects of capital punishment.

Most death penalty cases involve the execution of murderers although capital punishment can also be applied for treason, espionage, and other crimes. The death penalty gives justice to the murder victim’s families, it also brings relief because now they can rest without worry knowing that the killer is dead. The death penalty should be utilized for the serious crimes (Jost 2). The Death penalty can be useful because by killing off the criminals the jail space can be decreased because it's not holding barbaric animals. The criminals are just waste of life pieces of trash that need to put into the incinerator. These facts make it evident that the death penalty is greatly needed.

We ‘all’ live in a society with the same basic constitutional rights and guarantees. We have the right to life. We have the right to liberty. We also have the right of the pursuit of happiness with equal opportunities. This is the basis for our society established by the Declaration of Independence. Our founding Father’s declared that all men are created equal. It is the foundation on which all else is built on. Therefore, a person must be removed from society when they blatantly attack this foundation by murdering another, robbing them of the aforementioned rights. But does this necessarily mean that person should no longer live, should no longer exist?

Common sense, lately bolstered by statistics, tells us that the death penalty will deter murder... People fear nothing more than death. Therefore, nothing will deter a criminal more than the fear of death... life in prison is less feared. Murderers clearly prefer it to execution -- otherwise, they would not try to be sentenced to life in prison instead of death... Therefore, a life sentence must be less deterrent than a death sentence. And we must execute murderers as long as it is merely possible that their execution protects citizens from future murder.

Since the very beginning of the growth of the thirteen colonies, to the end product being the United States of America, 15,760 citizens have been executed. Throughout the time span, their methods of executions have gotten more sophisticated, for the good and unfortunately, the bad. The first methods of executions include, but are not limited to: burning on the stake, hangings, or being shot down by a firing squad. The more sophisticated methods include; death by gas in a chamber, electrocution by the electric chair, lethal injections and other methods. All these methods do what they are designed to do, but some have a unreasonably high botch rates,

The death penalty, what comes to mind when you hear those words? Death, punishment, murder, the value of life and right to live, perhaps even the constitution. That is what comes to mind of many people who hear those words. Should we have the death penalty or should we not? Capital punishment should only be used for the right purposes, at the right time, for only the worst offenders. The goal in this paper is to shed some light, and express the beliefs on capital punishment.

The strongest argument for the death penalty is the added cost to society of keeping a person in prison for twenty years at a cost of more than $50,000 per year (Smith, 1). With that being said, we are taking away money from building new roads and increasing the school education system because we are housing the living expenses of a criminal who has committed a horrendous crime. The death penalty not only affects the nation’s economy but also can hel settle with emotional comfort. The family members that committed can have some type of closure and relief instead of having the constant

The death penalty has deeper implication in our society, we are unconsciously teaching young children, if someone does something to you, it is ok to do something back, because the government does the same thing. People grow up and began to believe if the

Thesis One: In principle a case can be made on moral grounds both supporting and

Death punishment, gives closure to the people involved with the tragedy. It helps to the overpopulation problem in the prison system, instead keeping an intern 25 years or more. Finally, people who received the death punishment usually are not able to be rehabilitated. If these people have the opportunity they will kill, rape, and torture again. There are many factors that make murders incapable to