Argumentative Essay On Winston Churchill

Decent Essays

He is thought to be one of the most controversial personalities of world’s history. Often referred to as “the British Bulldog”, he has been voted as “the greatest Briton of all times”. Some people concern him as “defender of democracy” and an incredible orator, while others criticize him strongly for his actions during his being in power. We obviously refer to Winston Churchill, a man who left a complicated legacy behind him and whose personality and choices influenced – and still do- not only British politics, but the whole world’s ones.
To begin with, Churchill was politically active from an early age. Twice named Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, he is best known for his participation and his crucial role during World War II. With his …show more content…

Those helped him not only as a diplomat, but also as a public speaker and leader. As journalist Beverley Nichols once wrote, “He took the English language and sent it into battle”. Unlike other British politicians and having realized Hitler’s menace, Churchill was urging decisive action against the Nazis and disapproved appeasement. Therefore, through his intense and well prepared speeches, he boosted the self-esteem of British people and transmitted the spirit of war and unity all over the country.
As for the outcome of the war, Churchill’s tactics turned out being quite effective, since the Allied forces gained victory over the Axis powers. The British Prime Minister was thought to have “saved the western civilization”, according to Steve Forbes (2014), as well as democracy and the liberties of Western Europe. In order to appreciate more Churchill’s influence and contribution to the war, it is necessary to think what would have happened had he not pushed Britain in the battle …show more content…

By many he is concerned as an imperialist, a belligerent leader. He planned to conquest more countries and expend the British Empire, because he insisted that the “Aryan stock is bound to triumph”. Therefore, it is very likely that his participation in the war was the part of a wider plan and a deeper motive. He did not just aim to defend his country from a rival. He fought for “a raw white supremacism”, as expressed by Richard Toye in his book “Churchill’s Empire” (2010).
It is true that the British leader believed in the superiority of the white race, which explains why his policies reflect racism as well as fascism. A pretty good example that justifies this opinion is his attitude towards the starving Indians in 1943. The famine in Bengal broke out because of his decision to divert food supplies from India to the front lines in Europe during the war and, as a result, millions of Indians starved to death. Nevertheless, Churchill was indifferent and insisted that it was their own fault for “breeding like

Get Access