Argumentative Essay: The Benefits Of Animal Testing

Thousands of each species are killed every year against their will due to animal testing. Most people are under the misconception that animal experiments enhance human cures due to the media, experimenters, and universities which exaggerate animals’ potential and the role they have played in past medical advancements. Researching thoroughly on websites, books, articles and organizations, I will prove the common misconception that animals are needed for human advancement to be incorrect. Animal testing is proven to hurt humans directly and misleading animal experiments causes humans to dispose of cures.

Animal testing has been going on for years; however, few question the ethics of testing medicines that would cure human diseases on animals. Various animals being tested in labs and cruelly force them to be a host of harmful diseases negatively affect their health. Animal testing is cruel and unusual punishment and should discontinue. Animal experimentation is a subject that many know of but don’t know much about. Although it is a big topic, people still don’t pay much attention to it because of their lack of information. Experimenting is a cruel process that causes many innocent animals to suffer. Many cases of violations towards experimenting have been found as well. Testing on animals is unnecessary when laying down the

Animal testing is an old fashioned way of testing medications and products to ensure that they are safe for humans. It is a way to further our society, without inflicting any harm to our race, but in today's society, it is no longer a required option for testing. For one, it is very cruel to animals. We should not be self involved and only think about ourselves. The world cannot survive that way. We need animals in the world, and if we continue treating them in this harmful manner they will no longer be able to provide for the world’s environment. Also, animal testing has been proven to not be as effective as people may think. In the Baltimore Sun writer Kelly Overton claims that “90 percent of medications approved for human use after animal testing later proved ineffective or harmful to humans in clinical trials.” This demonstrates that animal testing is no longer required in today’s society. We have better ways to test with new technology, instead of with animal testing that has been proven to be highly ineffective. Overall, in the past animal testing may have been needed to save

Animal testing is first and for most pointless and a waste of time and money. After the passing of an animal trial, there must always be human trials as well. Since animal testing is unreliable, the real testing still solely relies on the human tests. This demonstrates that this method is unnecessary. Greek and Greek argue that “those who say we test on animals to avoid testing on people are wrong. Once animal studies are complete, all new medications are evaluated on humans. The first people to take a new substance are being experimented on as surely as if they were guinea pigs locked in a laboratory” (59). In addition to that, the 21st century has brought many new advances in technology and science and because we have these new advances, animal testing now is completely unnecessary. Bif Naked states, “It doesn't just make sense for animals, but for people, too, because state-of-the-art non-animal tests offer a far more reliable way to predict how consumers like you or me will react to a product in the real world.” While many of these method have not been explored fully, they are still extremely promising, less harmful, cheaper, and produce more accurate results. Rachel Rutter states, “Effective, affordable, and humane research methods include studies of human populations, volunteers, and patients, as well as sophisticated in vitro, genomic, and computer-modeling techniques.” None of these methods

When it comes to the topic of animal testing most of us will readily agree that it is a debatable topic. Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of whether animal testing is effective in finding cures. Whereas some are convinced that it is very effective and has been the cause of major medical breakthroughs, others maintain it is not effective or safe because humans and animals are not genetically the same. My own view is we should not use animals for testing because it cannot always be accurate or safe, instead we should use computer simulations like Quantitative Structure- activity Relationships (QSARs) and Human patient Stimulators which are safer and accurate.

The world we know today would not exist without animals. Today’s medicine and amenities have made everyone’s lives significantly better, but the methods used to find some of these things are not so wonderful. Namely, testing products on animals. Product testing on animals has been used for several breakthroughs in medicine and how we live our lives, but is it at a greater cost than it is reward? Animal testing has been used for several hundred years as a way to find new developments in medicine; however, some of the means of this are terrible and animals are subjected to great pain and die in captivity.

Imagine being locked up in a cage for most of your life. Imagine, never being able to see the outside world at least once in your life. Imagine having your last few minutes alive, with a syringe in your eye. This is the life for animals that are in animal testing. The question is, does animal testing really make enough productive results to make up for all the suffering in between? My opinion on this argument is no. In the following paragraphs I will be proving how animal testing isn't successful, how it is torture and inhumane, and that there are alternatives.

First, animals test does not reliably predict results in human beings. Ninety four percent of drugs that past animals test fail in humans clinical traits. This proof right here shows that animal test do not reliably predict results in human beings. According to neurologist Aysha Akhtar. MD, mph over 100 stroke drugs that were effective when tested on animals, have failed in humans. There is no point to do animal testing if most of it does not even work on humans. Over 85 HIV vaccines failed in humans after working well in non human primates. They are making vaccines that don't even work on us humans so I don’t know why they keep trying.

Animals are used by scientists to develop research for new medications and experiments daily. The Humane Society is working to decrease the use of animals in laboratories by promoting the advancement of affective alternative approaches. Animal testing provides a useful model for treatments of diseases and possible cures. According to the US-based foundation of Biomedical Research, animal testing has made a major advance within the last century- for veterinary health and humans. The practice of using animals for testing has been debated for many decades. Is it morally right or wrong to use animals during experiments? Does federal law ensure that animals used in research are treated humanely? When considering the benefits of animal testing,

At many other labs the owners of them require its scientist to have to kind of animal care certification (Wade). At many labs they have a class that the scientist can take so that they are qualified to work at their lab (Wade). Most labs will also have animal care professionals on their site to take care of the animals. But sometimes, the caretakers aren’t caring for the animals, and they end up suffering from even more pain (Wade).

Animal testing not only benefit humans, animals also benefit themselves with the experimentation (Cook, 2006). Since animals testing has been put into practice the lifetime of animals has expanded. The development of drugs for the human health has also contributed for the development of drugs for animals. Besides the development of new drug for the help of humans and animals, animal testing leave a extended scientific knowledge (Jentsch, 2010). Beyond the knowledge that animal testing leave, the amount of cures and treatments for diseases such as cancer, heart diseases, parkinson, diabetes, hepatitis C, and many others. (Animal Research Means Medical Progress, Americans for Medical Progress). Animal testing is

“According to Humane Society International, animals used in experiments are commonly subjected to force feeding, forced inhalation, food and water deprivation, prolonged periods of physical restraint, the infliction of burns and other wounds to study the healing process, the infliction of pain to study its effects and remedies, and ‘killing by carbon dioxide asphyxiation, neck-breaking, decapitation, or other means.‘ “ - Animal Testing

Although animal testing has some negatives, it also has some positives. The association, Americans for Medical Processes has stated that “animal-based research has contributed to significant improvement in the length and quality of our lives.” One of the ways in which animal testing has assisted humans is in the treatment of cancer. Due to animal based research, scientists were able to discover new molecular and genetic understandings of tumor biology. This knowledge has lead to treatments that help solve the problem of cancer. Another way in which animal testing has helped humans is in HIV/AIDS. Although there is not a cure for the disease yet, animal testings have helped scientists make custom drugs with less side effects. Also, the knowledge

The above examples on animal testing is an evidence that the use of animals in scientific research has and is beneficial for the treatment in medications of asthma, diabetes, polio, and several other health disorders, in the human lives. Furthermore, research in medical science with the help of animal testing might also bring cures for AIDS, cancer and other severe diseases (Singer 2013). Uses of animals have no other alternatives because many animals such as rabbits, monkeys or rats have several similarities in physical processes as compared to human bodies. Through animal testing, scientists have been able to test the negative and positive effects of medicines. If a certain medicine is found with negative effects in animals, it is considered unsafe for human lives as well(Christensen, Johnson and Turner 2011).

The use of testing drugs on animals is important for humans because the risk of these chemicals have unknown side effects that could harm humans. In 1937 a doctor set out a new drug in the U.S pharmaceutical companies. The Drug was called Sulfanilamide mixed with raspberry flavoring; which was to help treat sore throat and other illnesses. Sulfanilamide wasn’t tested on animals so the doctors weren’t aware of the disastrous effects on humans causing death; over 100 people died from the drug. That’s when the 1906 Food, Drug and cosmetic act was passed to review these products that would be put on the market. The public criticized that animal testing lowers the right of animals to live their life. Other people say that animals like mice and