Arguments Against The Electoral College

The Electoral College is an excuse of the electoral process, proving itself to be undemocratic, false in representation, and harmful to third-parties. Therefore, the Electoral College should be abolished, and the process should rely on the popular vote to have the leading judgement in the election procedure for a new president. The Electoral College has proven that a candidate may not need to win the popular vote of the people of the nation in order to win the presidential election. But first, beforehand, let me introduce the system in which the Electoral Process is based upon. The Electoral Process is the government’s created system of indirect voting in order to elect the nation’s president.

In the United States, the Electoral College determines the victor of a national election. Each state has its own number of electoral votes, which is determined by state population. This system is a “winner takes all” system. Which means the candidate with 50 percent or more of the votes in an individual state gets all of that states electoral votes. The 2016 presidential election will have 538 electoral votes, this means that the election will be decided who is the first candidate to 270 votes. Some people have seen this system as outdated and unjust. Many are looking at a way to change the system and others would like to do away with the system

A Congressional Proportional method is another alternative being proposed in opposition to the Electoral College. A Congressional proportional method would allocate votes based on the winner of each congressional district. It would also award the winner of the overall popular vote in each state two electoral votes(senators). Once again on the surface this system looks fair and reasonable, but if you investigate deeply it can be seen that there is one glaring flaw in this system. The act of Gerrymandering which is used throughout the United States in every state is when the authority in each state decided which way the districts will be drawn. In simpler terms an authority could draw district that would exclude certain type of voters to increase

Not all systems are perfect, nor is the Electoral College. As we seen in the 2016 presidential election, the popular vote may not necessarily get the majority in the Electoral College resulting in what is criticized not to be as democratic when the popular vote winner, Hillary Clinton in this case, was the loser of the election. The outcome of the election can be dictated by the electors and in some cases not reflect the will of the people. Also, the winner-take-all clause creates a possibility that the popular vote gets nothing even in a situation when is it very close to half the votes. All states except for

Some people may believe that having the electoral college takes away the rights and needs of the states, but it does the complete opposite; it allows the president to meet the state’s needs and give them the power that is promised “The Electoral College makes sure that the states count in the presidential elections. As such, it is an important part of our federalist system...”(Document C). Document C shows us that the states are represented and have been represented for centuries due the to system in which certain powers are given to the states in order to keep the federal government in check. Consequently our states rely on the Electoral College to

In the “Point: Abolishing the Electoral College,” Benjamin Bolinger, a licensed lawyer who can practice law in Colorado and Pennsylvania, argues that the Electoral College needs to be abolished for the American democracy. Bolinger examines that some states with a little population have large number of electoral college compare to those states with larger populations. He believes that the Electoral College damages the value of democratic government by leaving

Research suggests that the Electoral College system should be amended because it poorly illustrates democracy, is outdated and

John Samples, author of “In Defense of the Electoral College,” says that the Electoral College is an “important part” of the federalist system of the United States, claiming that it allows for the important principle of state rights. “The Electoral College,” he writes, “makes sure that the states count in presidential elections.” He is not incorrect in that statement- states definitely do count, but they have a much bigger impact than they should. The president is not for the states, but rather for the

There’s a saying that is thrown around from time to time stating that “if something is not broke don’t fix it.” It seems to be thrown around all the time after a president has been chosen in America usually by the winning side, meanwhile, the opposing side always complains how unfair the presidential election is. Some people say this is the way our founding fathers chose our country to always work and there is no reason to go back to tweak the process. To better understand what certain electoral college supporters, mean by not changing what the founding fathers wanted and what they drew up one has to go back in history.

The Electoral College is an institution that has existed for since the early 1800s, but the purpose of the Electoral College remains a mystery to many people. In a country where the president is supposed to be elected by and for the people, why is there an institution that controls where all the votes from a state go? The Electoral College should be abandoned because its system of voting does not represent the people, the electors could easily vote for whomever they want, and because the Electoral College gives more power to some states than other. When a citizen votes, he wants his vote to count; this is a right guaranteed to him and all other citizens by the constitution. However, if he votes for a candidate who receives only 49% of the vote while another candidate receives 51% of the vote, all of his state’s electoral votes will go to the other candidate, with the exception of two states.

The Electoral College: a system that the U.S. has used over the years to choose representatives and is a compromise between election by a vote. The Electoral College should not be abolished for three reasons. These reasons are: The system helps candidates who struggle with winning the Popular Vote; with Electoral Votes, it gives the little states enough power and votes, and if we abolish The Electoral College, we weaken the Political Two-Party-System. And if not weakened, then destroyed. These reasons will show that the Electoral College should not be abolished, and should be kept.

Every time there is an election in the United States, the debate of Electoral College always heats up, and suddenly everybody seems to know about or at least they are interested in learning about it. The Electoral College is firmly established under the United States Constitution to elect the president and the vice president of the United States indirectly. A slate of “electors” are chosen from each state, and they are the ones responsible for voting for president in the general elections depending on which party the candidate is vying with. From this statement, what it means is that one does not choose his or her preferred leader directly and this has made many suggestions that the Electoral College is not a true representation of democracy. This paper will look at the strongest arguments for and against the Electoral College, analyze whether the current Electoral College should be re-engineered or scrapped in favor of direct vote and finally determine if the Electoral College is consistent or contrary to democratic principle.

shouldn’t either. Each state elects their equivalence of President by using a popular vote. Each qualified voter in a state votes for the candidate they wish to see as their Governor and the candidate that receives the most votes is elected. Our President should be elected using a popular vote just the same as literally every other political office in this country. Akhil Reed Professor of Law at Yale University has the following to add; “the fact that no state uses an Electoral College for its governor suggest that many standard arguments for the Electoral College…make weight. If these arguments were truly sound, then states would be stupid and states are not stupid” (para. 2). There is truly no other way to look at this, the Electoral College is completely unnecessary when it comes to electing our President. Every other political office in this country is filled by either using a popular vote or by direct appointment. There is no reason that the Electoral College continue to be our method of electing the most powerful person in our country if not the

There are so many parts about the electoral college that are very wishy-washy among Americans. The emotions and thoughts that we have towards political topics go back and forth, either way, no matter who you ask. The electoral college is one of the stickiest topics brought up. That is because there are positives and negatives about every part of it. Where do those ups and downs come from, however, and what are they?

The Constitution of the United States of America created a system called the Electoral College where it outlines the rules in which we elect the President of the United States of America. As stated in Article 2, Section 1 of the U. S. Constitution created the Electoral College. Each state receives as many electoral votes as it has senators and representatives. Therefore, each state, including the District of Columbia, will have at least three electors. This is the vision of the Constitution. Now the problem arises when all the Electoral votes from one state are given to the popular winner for that state. This causes a with people’s right to chose their leader as votes of the people that voted for the losing candidate are tossed in the trash. All this while giving the state the ultimate power to elect the president.