preview

Arthur Schopenhauer Optimism And Pessimism

Good Essays

Pessimism is conceptualised as a lens in which the aspects of life are viewed with a sombre temperament, distorting one’s appreciation for life by ignoring its good aspects, thus lowering one’s expectations. Arthur Schopenhauer is often categorised as the greatest pessimist in Western philosophy despite never formally characterising himself as such. However, he exercises the concepts “optimism” and “pessimism” to classify certain conceits of suffering in his philosophies on human life and existence in order to classify the ‘good’ and ‘evil’ that pervade the human condition. Schopenhauer articulates what he perceives as the cruel realities of life by asserting that human existence is burdened by the twin poles of human suffering; want and boredom, …show more content…

I found it interesting that he made a distinction between humans and animals; as humans are in fact animals. Although the needs of both human and non-human animals are pleasure and survival, which have the same basis of desire for food, shelter and sex, humans ultimately desire more from life. Humans are consumed and obsessive over desires and so we spend our lives filled with, “work, worry, toil” to attain them, (Schopenhauer, 1850, p:44). Schopenhauer separates the two as he believes; “the higher the organism, the greater the suffering” (DeMarco, D et al p:32). It is for this reason that he argues that non-human animals are happier than human beings despite man having an “intensification of his sensations of happiness” in common with non-human animals. He justifies that humans are more sensitive to both pleasure and pain, but have much greater passion and emotion regarding their desires than non-human animals. Fundamentally, Schopenhauer’s philosophy on earthly existence as a whole is that our world is one in which all beings suffer, but to various …show more content…

The philosopher then looks towards the influence that religion has on the enquiry of the meaning of life. Thus, emerges the dichotomy of ‘empiricism’ and ‘rationalism’ and ‘good’ and ‘evil’ in his philosophy from a higher level of existential evaluation. I have found “On the Sufferings of the World” to be reflective of Schopenhauer’s practice of rationalist thought as he criticises Christianity. He scrutinises the concept of an all-loving god, stating that if he in fact does exist, he must surely be cruel, “for he should have created a better world than this one”, p:48. I personally find validity behind this argument. If God truthfully exists, why has he created a world that ratifies suffering? Christian ideology, however, is optimistic; in short, ‘God’ created a world of free will, but suffering is a man-made evil. Schopenhauer pities this argument that the problem of evil is overruled by goodness, “we come into the world already encumbered with guilt” (Schopenhauer, 1850, p:49). Therefore, the next question is, if humans have free will, why does it translate into

Get Access