Assignment 4: How Evidence Can Interfere With Business Process

When evidence is found initially during or a s consequence of an illegal search or

Introduction This paper will critically analyse an incident that occurred during my placement on a forensic low secure unit. The Low secure unit provides

As is the case with any type of evidence seizure, what is fair game and what is off limits needs to be identified and set, preferably in writing before any work is done. (Nelson, Phillips, & Steuart, 2015). This ensures that the forensics team will be protected in the worst case scenario where the company could have an issue with what was taken, very similar to the protection ethical hackers require when performing a penetration test (##). Once this list is created, the team will interview the system administrators to provide any information allowed about the systems such as the equipment, system baselines, passwords that are allowed to be shared, and any special information that would need to be known before analyzing the system such as what information is logged and where would it be stored (Rowlingson, 2004). The entire purpose of this information gathering is to paint a clearer picture of the situation so a more detailed plan could be devised prior to any systems being touched.

reliable evidence, the confirmation process is subject to the risk of interception and alteration of

Denied. On April 20, 2105, a date agreed upon with Travis’s mother, the parties attended a ARD committee meeting to discuss continued placement and services until such time that a comprehensive evaluation could be completed. At this time, the District has assigned approximately-trained professionals to conduct the agreed-up and parentally approved assessments. Once the assessments are completed, the ARD committee will appropriately consider the results and develop an appropriate educational program reasonably calculated to provide Travis with educational benefit in his least restrictive environment.

Further, the ultimate challenge in both settings is that the investigative process sufficiently confirms all likely sources of information are identified, while providing reasonable assurance that any source/suspect who is eventually interrogated is responsible for the alleged act or has access to the critical information sought. This process should make use of all available information (e.g., physical evidence, witness reports, apparent motive, access, opportunity, etc.), including in some cases a lack of

In addition, this staff did not follow the protocols of obtain prior authorization, and if they did could have avoided this entirely. A solution for this is ensuring all staff are compliant with all aspects and providing greater monitoring for this demand, as it can cause the greatest vulnerability.

One must have probable cause which is used to execute a search. Probable cause consist of evidence of illegal activity that can be located in a specific place.

Employer has to take responsibility to determine any confined space in his facility. If there are any enclosed space, a record of confined spaces should be developed and maintained.

Once a fraud examination has been completed the fraud examiner often is called upon to testify before judicial authorities regarding the findings. Investigators must be detail-oriented when it comes to evidence admitted during a trial. If evidence processing is not done correctly, an innocent person may be convicted of a crime that was never committed. Prove that the alleged fraudster made a misrepresentation by obtaining the accurate copy of the documents like the claims forms or medical records where it contain the false statement. Prove that Altamirano knew that his representation was false; and he intend to mislead and obtain a financial benefit from another party. Keeping evidence intact and using the correct tools and procedures as

When the scene has been safeguarded and lawful authority to seize the proof has been inveterate, devices can be gathered. The initial responder’s necessity to take special care with digital devices in adding to. Usual

The proper gathering, handling and processing of trace evidence is a vital part of any investigation. Because not all cases are cut and dry, the criminals are not caught in the act, having the proper evidence can speak volumes. As stated previously, hair, fingerprints, and biological fluid stains are just some of the common types of trace evidence however, as technology continues to push forward, more and more evidence and ways of testing is coming to light.

Challenges can come in many forms such as if no search warrant was obtained to support a search and seizure under the Fourth Amendment to the validity and reliability of scientific evidence and how it was collected and maintained. In such cases, the investigator and lab technicians are usually called in to testify and explain the authenticity and standards of the procedure before the evidence is submitted (Swanson, 2012). The expert must be prepared to answer questions according to the Frye or Daubert standard of the states accepted standards for admissibility of both scientific and testimony evidence (Nierenberg, 2016).

In order to satisfy legal obligations we collect such information as contract arrangements, employees’ duties, payments, working hours, holiday entitlements, bonuses, as well as documents relating to health and safety. It is important for the organization to timely provide accurate and valid data in order to avoid fees or other sanctions for the Inspections that can check any data regarding individual employees.