DeAires Blackwell
Detailed outline of speech
Intro
Who am I?
Why am I here?
Go over criminal justice process from beginning to end
My job description
Parole officer
Guess speaker
Criminal justice process from start to finish
Investigation
Main objective is to gather all information/evidence to support an arrest
One must have probable cause which is used to execute a search. Probable cause consist of evidence of illegal activity that can be located in a specific place.
Arrest
Must read an individual his or her rights
Consist of taking an individual into custody for holding until court
One must have probable cause to arrest which shows a correlation between an individual and a specific crime.
Officer must observe the person commiting the crime
Probable cause
Officer makes an arrest
…show more content…
In federal system all cases must be brought by indictment, states have the option to use either preliminary hearing or grand jury.
Preliminary hearing-counsel interrogates witnesses and all parties make arguments then judge decides the ultimate findings of probable cause
Grand jury- call their own witnesses and have the option to request further investigations
Grand jury decides if evidence has been presented to indict the suspect.
Trial
Judge will find the defendant guilty or not.
Prosecutor must show beyond a reasonable doubt that the suspect has committed the crimes that's been charged
Suspect has the right to a jury trial.
A judge or jury makes the final determination of guilty or not after hearing all
Stop & Frisk- if the police officer has reasonable suspicion that a criminal act took place or is about take place he can search the suspect. If the police officer believes they are arm and dangerous. It is a bit less serious than probable cause. An example can be Johnny is walking down the street with a set of pliers in his
The court could choose either a preliminary hearing or grand jury proceeding to establish probable cause for the felony charges in this case. Compare and contrast the two procedures. Preliminary hearing would indicate that John Doe was arrested and a complaint issued or filed with the Ocean County of where the violation occurred. Thus, prompting the judicial process: i.e. Preliminary hearing, plea, and trial. Grand jury would entail the officer or ADA presents the Grand Jury with the facts or probable cause of reasons why John Doe was arrested. Grand Jury could hear testimony from the officer and witnesses associated with the case. Once the facts are presented the Grand Jury would have an opportunity to ask questions. After the hearing, the Grand Jury would be requested to vote and either issues a true bill of indictment or find a no bill for Mr. John Doe.
If there was no warrant for John's arrest this hearing will also determine if there is probable cause (Gerstein v. Pugh). Probable cause means that a reasonable ground exists for belief in the facts.
While reasonable suspicion does not require hard evidence, it does require more than a hunch. A combination of particular facts, even if each is individually insignificant, can form the basis of reasonable suspicion. For example, police may have reasonable suspicion to detain someone who fits a description of a criminal suspect, a suspect who drops a suspicious object after seeing police, or a suspect in a high crime area who runs after seeing police.
A probable cause is established at the time of a preliminary hearing or preliminary examination. The hearing judge decides whether there is a combination of facts and circumstances that would encourage a reasonably intelligent person to believe that he or she should commit a crime. A probable cause must be examined from different angles in order to closely understand the mind of a person with non-criminal background. Those with a non-criminal background are exposed to committing crimes regardless of how clean their criminal record might look. Usually, the jury’s determination of a probable cause impacts the final decision of the case and how serious the law breaker’s punishment will be.
This comprises of indirect evidence which aids in detection of crime while not fully proving it. The probable cause sources are enough in some cases while for others further information or evidence needs to be provided. If the judge wants to issue search warrants, then the probable cause must highlight that the person got involved in criminal activity and the crime has taken place.
Thus, this leaves this determination up to the courts to decide case by case. Probable cause quantitates specific levels of suspicion and is based on facts and prudent belief of guilt, thus allowing a law enforcement officer to perform a warrantless search. Probable cause is more substantial than reasonable suspicion pertaining to the justification for an investigative detention. (Devallis Rutledge, 2010).
Reasonable suspicion is a reasonable likelihood that a crime has been, is being, or will be committed. It is a reasonable belief based on facts or circumstances and is informed by a police officer’s training and experience. Reasonable suspicion is seen as more than a guess or hunch but is less than probable cause. Probable cause is the logical belief, supported by facts and circumstances, which a crime has been, is being, or will be committed. The difference between the two are the fact that probable cause has evidence or is fact based whereas reasonable suspicion is a hunch.
Probable cause is defined as a reasonable belief that a crime has been committed, that evidence is at the place being sear5ched or on the person being searched, or that a specific person is believed to have committed, is committing, or will commit a certain crime. Law enforcement cannot just go to a judge and say they have probable cause for a warrant. To obtain a warrant law enforcement needs something to substantiate their belief. The standard for probable cause to be met is for any reasonable person to believe based on the evidence or observations presented that indeed either a suspect has or is engaging in criminal activity, or that evidence exists at a certain location. Not all searches require probable cause to be established. The exception to the probable cause is reasonable suspicion. An example of this is a customs search. A custom search requires no warrant or probable cause be presented. But if a custom agent is going to detain a traveler for an extended
The criminal trial process is an interesting process that takes place in Courtrooms all across the United States and throughout the globe. This study intends to set out the various steps in the criminal trial process in the American justice system. A trial is described as a "legal forum for resolving individual disputes, and in the case of a criminal charge, it is a means for establishing whether an accused person is legally guilty of an offense. The trial process varies with respect to whether the matter at issue is civil in nature or criminal. In either case, a jury acts as a fact-finding body for the court in assessing information and evidence that is presented by the respective parties in a case. A judge presides over the court and addresses all the legal issues that arise during the trial. A judge also instructs the jury how to apply the facts to the laws that will govern in a given case." (3rd Judicial District, 2012)
Second, there must be probable cause to believe that the items sought are connected to criminal activity (Hall, 2016.) When a search warrant is granted then there needs to be probable cause that is connected to the criminal act in which we are able to find more evidence to prosecute the criminal.
All the jury must agree on a verdict, if this is not possible then the
The term reasonable suspicion refers to proof that is less that probable cause, but more than just a hunch. Reasonable suspicion can be used to make brief stops, and even detention of a suspect, until a police officer can complete an investigation of a crime. Reasonable suspicion is information that a reasonable law enforcement officer would believe that a crime has, was or is about to occur, using his or her training.
Probable cause is a requirement which can be found in the Fourteenth Amendment that must usually be met before an arrest can be made, before being allowed to conduct a search, seize property, and to receive a warrant which is related to the alleged crime. Probable cause is considered a level of reasonable belief, probable cause must be based on facts and not an assumption. In civil court, a person can be sued if they have probable cause, and in criminal court, the defendant can be prosecuted or arrested if they also have probable cause. If the officer cannot prove probable cause, unfortunately, the evidence then becomes inadmissible, and the evidence will be thrown out.
Next is the preliminary hearing. This is where the judge hears the evidence and from the