Asylum Violation Summary

The various branches of law provide citizens with structure as a technique to avoid chaos and move forward as a nation. However, a structure exclusive of flaws is impossible to achieve. This being so, law has weaknesses and these weaknesses can prevent a being from making adequate judgments. In particular, Canada’s refugee system is flawed as unjust deportations are taking place. Refugees escape their hometown to depart persecution of some sort and commence their lives in safer countries (“How Canada’s Refugee System Works” 2016, par. 1). The Refugee system in Canada follows a particular set of guidelines regarding how to qualify, apply, and stay in the country. With numerous protection programs, the institute is immense as ruthless decisions

This essay explores how unaccompanied asylum seeking children (UASC) are oppressed in the UK. An unaccompanied asylum seeking child is a person under the age of eighteen who has left their country of origin in order to seek refuge and is ‘separated from both parents and are not being cared for by an adult who, by law or custom has responsibility to do so’ (UNHCR, 1994:121). They are therefore applying for asylum in their own right.

Has United States or Canada been more effective with implementing and abiding by refugee rules and laws? Before discussing and comparing which of these countries had been more successful, the historical context of refugees needs to be explored. Although refugees have existed throughout the course of history, the definitions of what a refuge is had shifted and evolved over time. The League of Nations in the 1920s defined refugees “by categories, specifically in relation to their country of origin.” Up until 1950s, the League of Nations, which later became the United Nations, “established and dismantled several international institutions devoted to refugees in Europe.” After World War II, creating and facilitating solutions for refugees were of high importance internationally. This is evident in the first session of United Nations General Assembly in 1946 when it adopted the principle that no refugee who had “expressed valid objections to returning to their countries [sic] of origin ... shall be compelled to return.”

Throughout the years, there have been articles about asylum seekers resorting to violence due to discontentment with the Australian government regarding the assessment of their refugee status. These are evident cries for help which sparks off debates on the government’s abilities to find a successful solution to the asylum issues. Australia has been criticized due to the requirements of compulsory immigration detention for ‘all unlawful non-citizens, (including asylum seekers)’ (Phillips & Spinks 2013, p.1). The other controversial issue of Australia regarding the asylum seekers is also the claims that it has been avoiding it’s responsibilities under the United Nations refugee conventions by making it hard for asylum seekers to claim

I have chosen the topic about the refugee and asylum seekers health issues as refugee health considering one of the important health problems in Australian. The review will focus some issues on refugee health base on the relevant and substantial literature. Literature review tried explore about

Recently, concerns have been raised by political figures and the people of Australia regarding the ‘abysmal treatment’ of asylum seekers (Claire Mallinson, 2015). The violations of their human rights in regards to the conditions they are forced to live in inside detention centers show that these centres do not operate within the humanitarian requirements Australia has agreed to abide by. The current process that handles the arrival and subsequent treatment of asylum seekers does not allow the migratory system to properly address the complications that the present circumstances impose. The Universal Declaration Human Rights (1948) (UDHR) and the United Nations 1951 Refugee Convention were signed by Australia to recognize its support of these

Determine (1) whether Billy can file a petition for asylum on behalf of his 14-year-old niece, Jane, (2) whether Jane must file a claim for asylum for herself, and (3) if Jane meets the immigration requirements.

A refugee is a person who was forced to leave their country. Whether it be from warfare or natural disaster, their homes are no longer safe to live in, so they need to relocate elsewhere. Once someone sets foot on the journey of becoming a refugee, they become vulnerable and dependent with no sense of what the future will bring. In an attempt to accommodate them, first world countries with the resources necessary to assist these refugees, are struggling to determine whether or not they should step-in and help. Some argue that taking them in could come with excessive consequences, while others believe they could be assets. Although there may be a few consequences, they are outweighed by the benefits and undeniable severity of the situation.

The dilemma regarding the American refugee policy and America’s stance on refugees at this point in time is a challenging topic for many to discuss. Not only is this controversy affecting Americans, it is also hurting refugees in desperate need of our help. America needs to start handling the emerging refugee crisis by first working to remove the stereotype associated with refugees, then the U.S. needs to assess which refugee countries should (if any) actually be banned, and after accomplishing those-- America needs to work to help the countries in need by letting refugees in, and working to help the refugees live happily in their country of origin.

The United Nations approach on the treatment of refugees is as follows. the Convention relating to the status of Refugees 1967 Protocol defines who a refugee is and explains what Rights countries should afford to refugees. A refugee is a person who is outside of their own country and is unable or unwilling to return due to a well-founded fear of being persecuted because of their; race, religion, nationality, membership of a group or political

Australia, among many places, has legal restrictions and conventions in reference to the captivity and treatment of asylum seekers. These are seen through the ‘1951 Refugee Convention’ and it’s 1967 protocol. Legal guidelines are also seen in significant human rights treaties.

The prominence in relation to Asylum Seekers and Refugees has become a contemporary issue within Australian society and has amounted vast controversy in the media. A Refugee can be defined as a person who has been forced to leave their country in order to escape war, persecution, or natural disaster as found in the 1951 convention relating to the status of refugees, in which Australia is a signatory to. Every refugee has or will be an asylum seeker. An Asylum Seeker is a person who has left their home country as a political refugee seeking asylum in another but has not had their claim assessed. Asylum seekers have experienced serious breaches of their rights, religious freedom and justice to reach safety. If asylum seekers are found to be

According to Alnord (1983), the principles that constitute The Refugee Act of 1980 are the most comprehensive to provide aid to any refugee group of people, but each principle has raised conflicts and new debates are requested with regard to the implementations and constancy. Furthermore, the high level of refugees received in the United States is a great concern in congress due to the fact that this is exposed to the eyes of many larger conflicts of fiscal policy, border control and the appropriate role of the legislative branch (Alnord, 1983). Also, Alnord (1983)

The treatment of children in immigration detention is currently a major topic of public interest in Australia. It has been law in Australia since 1992 that anyone who is not a citizen and is without a legal visa will be detained when attempting to enter the country. This includes children (Humanrights.gov.au, 2015). These children are to stay in detention until they are either granted entrance to the country with a visa or removed from Australia. There is no limit on how long they can stay in detention (Humanrights.gov.au, 2015). Currently Australia is the only country that as a first resort uses compulsory and indefinite detention for child asylum seekers (Australian Human Rights Commission, 2014, p.10). The conditions in these detention

Prior research examining the general view of asylum seekers and immigrants in Australian society has classified that legitimacy, illegality, threats to national identity and threats to border security are the main themes regarding public discourse (Rowe & O’Brien, 2013). Particularly politicians in the media focus on these themes and represent asylum seekers as legitimate or illegitimate. This discourse that is evident through the media, the political climate and just in the general public which creates a negative image for any migrant in Australia, legal or illegal. Severe segregation for those untraditionally Australian occurs solely because of the negative stigma surrounding immigration to this country.