preview

Atmospheric Specialisation

Decent Essays

Hemispheric specialisation is the idea that one hemisphere has specialised functions or that it applies greater control over a particular function. Both the left and right hemispheres are involved in nearly all functions. The left hemisphere specialises in verbal and analytical functions and controls the right side of the body, whereas the right hemisphere specialises in non-verbal functions and controls the left side of the body. The verbal functions from the left side of the hemisphere involves recognising and using words for reading, writing and speaking. The analytical functions involve breaking down a task and approaching it in a logical and sequential way especially used in solving mathematical problems. The non-verbal functions include …show more content…

Sperry would place objects behind the screen, out of sight from the patient but within reach of either hand. They were then asked to report what they had seen. When words were presented to the right visual field and therefore processed in the left hemisphere, patients were able to read and report the words verbally. When words were presented to the left visual field and therefore processed in the right hemisphere, patients were unable to report the words verbally. They were able to select the item by touch from behind the screen, but were unable to say why they had selected the item. This concluded that the left hemisphere can identify words and name them, whereas the right hemisphere can also identify words but cannot name …show more content…

Most patients are male and right-handed. In general, right-handed people have their main language centres in their left hemisphere while left-handed people may have main language centres in either the left or right. The patients all suffered from severe epilepsy and this may have affected their performance. They were all on long-term medication, and the surgery itself may have had side effects that exaggerated the results. It is not reasonable to say that these results can be generalised on each individual as the sample chosen was bias (convenient split-brain patients were used) and it did not represent the population as it was too small. One extraneous variable would be the distractions caused by the people and things around the room in which the experiment is taking place and therefore the experimenter should’ve had made sure to control this variable by making sure no distractions were present in the room. As this experiment was conducted over fifty years ago, there hasn’t been a replication of the experiment to show the reliability of the results and therefore it is a vague implication. The ethical guidelines (informed consent, withdrawal, deception, debriefing and confidentiality) in this experiment have not been stated in the study and therefore it is assumed that the guidelines were not followed. This is a big limitation in generalising the results as each study

Get Access