Attendance Policy for Colleges in the South Essay

Arrive on time for each on-campus class (and for exams) since entering late can disrupt others;

The author mentions in each rule a game-changer. It is the ways that can students change their bad habits. It is also the reasons why students should follow the rules in the book. The game-changer for rule number one are two. First of all, there is no substitute for your own lectures notes. Even if students are not good note takers, they should attend the class. Each student attends with his own background information and his own organization style, so he will suffer a lot when he tries to use his friends’ lectures notes. Secondly, each class period is a learning session. Students understand the lecture more if they attend the class even if they are not good at note taking. Also, they will get higher grade because they didn’t miss these learning sessions. If a student missed a whole week of class, that mean he missed three hours of learning sessions. That will affect his grade and his understanding of the course. The author adds that you can only miss classes for three reasons. First, if the student suffers from a disease that could kill him. Second, if the student have to donate a vital organ, e.g. kidney to save another person. Third, if the student wife is giving a birth because wives need their husbands at this time. These are the only excuses to skip classes.

This category is primarily characterized by students who are struggling with time management, and therefore, are constantly having difficulty getting to class on time. Despite the fact that they may be occasionally tardy, these students often have excellent attendance and show a willingness to learn. Unlike the high school students, it appears that these students show less of a concern with social interaction and are more concerned with getting to and from their classes.

The first reasoning why we should not enforce this law is because it could cause more tardies and absentense. If we do enforce this law in Wyoming it can be a problem because if the student parents or friend cannot pick them up and take them to school and they have no other way to get to school they could be tardy or abesent for their classes or schooling. Another reason if we so enforce this law with students and thay foget something important and it is before class they could be tardy for their class because they need that certain thing for their class.

The cons of this educational form seem to be more impactful on individual students instead of the student body as a whole. Using this schedule one of the issues that comes up is that students attention spans are only twenty to fifty minutes long. As a result, beyond that time period most teachers would lose the

Students wouldn't be late for class if they had the time to get ready, sleep longer, and eat breakfast. When some students aren't ready, their parent or guardian leaves them behind causing them to either not go to school or be late. There would not be as much skipping school from tiredness and laziness from having to wake up so early, and there would be less zeros in the grade book for late papers. Classes could even do group activities for students being there. Teachers frequently complain about absences, so why not help out with the

There are, and always will be, students that are late to class after off-campus lunches. Therefore, teachers may need to worry about students being late to class. However, this just shows that the late to class students do not care about school in the first place. If the students are late then they need to be restricted from the privilege

Relevance: As most of you know, attendance is crucial for you to do well in your classes. It’s also crucial to be on time. However; there are 30,320 students who live off campus and rely on the Bobcat shuttle transportation system to get them from their homes to class on time (Texas

In a recent survey 81% of students reported they were late to class because the passing period was too short and they either had to use the restroom or there class is too far away. Students should be able to have longer passing periods for restroom usage, and to have a little nutritional snack before the next class. If students had more time, they’d have time to get prepared for the next class. Lastly there would be less detention slips given out. Since they are so short students are upset because they are tardy and have to go to detention.

     Truancy can occur among students if an open campus is accepted. If students have the privilege to leave school for fifty whole minutes on their own, then they have the freedom to not come back. It would break the trust between students and educators, and harsher rules would have to be enforced on the open campus rule. Numerous students who decide to ditch the remaining periods would

Another reason I think kids should choose their own schedule is because, some students want to be in classes like band and not other classes. They might think "Mabey I can get into band if I change my schedule!". But they can't and then their dreams of being a musician will be crushed andd when their thanking thier teachers they won't thank you!! But

Staying on campus is way better than leaving because we won’t be late to class if we’re on campus. I know for sure teachers would be glad that their students are always on time and actually show up to class ready to learn. If the students stay on campus their wouldn’t be any tardies and nobody will have lunch detention which teachers will enjoy having a free lunch without any students because not just the students need relaxation so do the teachers. I am pretty sure there are students who are falling behind and should take the opportunity to catch up on assignments. Some students may not eat during their lunch so then they can use their time wisely and catch up on work or also work on not failing a

This solution will provide a higher-quality education for the rest of the students in the future. As contrast to what could be, here is an example. Last year I attended an English class here at Arroyo full of students who’d given up on learning, preferring to fool around during class. The teacher had simply given up on “us” (or the troublesome ones), the class was rowdy, out of control most of the time. If only this plan was in effect at that time! The teacher could have taught class uninterrupted without having to waste class time rebuking those annoying twerps. With this proposal in effect, class sizes would be smaller and there would be less disruption so teachers would have more one-on-one time helping students worthy of their time. The learning environment/peer influence would improve, resulting in better performance, even the school’s standards would be set

     Secondly, the majority of the students that do not attend class are usually the one’s that should not attend class. These students tend to be disruptive and tardy distracting the students that actually want to further their education. If this policy stays in effect, it will continue to place students with little or no academic motivation in the same learning environment as those striving to achieve their highest potential. This is detrimental to everyone involved in the education process because it slows down the pace of progression. By allowing students to miss class, the student-teacher ratio will be more favorable and teachers will have fewer distractions.

A prerequisite to success in any in any endeavor is "showing up", and classes are no exception. If you're not showing up to class, you're forfeiting every opportunity provided to you in the classroom.