Bare Boned Scaffolding

This question requires you to integrate a variety of sources into a coherent, well-written essay. Refer to the sources to support your position; avoid mere paraphrase or summary. Your argument should be central; the sources should support this argument.

* Try to make your points more concise. I had a hard time understanding what the main point of each paragraph was.

To be clear, the intent of this essay is not to argue for or against the content; instead, we are analyzing what the article does in terms of the following:

First, the essay is well constructed because Mae explains the issue and opposing positions clearly and in an engaging way. Mae includes quotes from articles and explains them thoroughly to show their relevance to the

Directions: After developing an outline to organize your reasons and evidence, construct your essay below. Don’t forget to explain how your evidence supports your reasoning, and not just explain what the quote means.

Clearly addresses the First Main Point including 2 or more sub-points from Professional Paper Worksheet. Depth and detail are excellent.

Be sure to provide a strong and specific thesis statement with a nice introduction to your essay. Also be sure to provide names, dates, book titles, court cases, statistics and any and all other relevant facts you can think of to support your answer. Staple this sheet to the front of your essay and be sure to follow the formatting rules discussed for previous FRQ’s.

This requires a properly formatted outline, a comprehensive outline that addresses key points, and a brief summary of key points

Create an outline for the Debate Paper that will be used to write the paper. Include all references to be used in the paper.

You must make it clear which are case study examples and which are actual examples of your real practice

This paper will not align itself behind a certain view in an attempt to twist the reader’s arm into believing one side is better than the other. It will provide no opinion whatsoever as to which side you should belong to; it will leave the qualities and failings of the argument itself alone.

I think you chose a task that is very fitting for the scaffolding project and I agree with you that it involves all three domains of capabilities with an emphasis on the cognitive aspect. One thing I’d like to mention is that you need to make sure the child does not already know how to sort laundry yet because a 6 year old might already have mastered that.

Briefly present the aim of the article or book chapter and summarize the main findings/key points, along with a limited number of examples. (Wulczyn, 2004)

Another reason that I am ready to pass this class and move on to change the world with my writing is that I know how to effectively and fairly address the viewpoints of others whose ideas may differ from my own on a certain topic while further proving why my argument is more valid. In the paper “Arguing a Position,” I was writing to convince parents to keep their children out of competitive sports until high school so that the children could be spared the health risks and pressure to be the best that competitive sports can bring to everyone involved. In my counterargument paragraph, I conceded to the fact that competitive sports can have physical and social benefits to the children if they are in the sport for a long enough period of time.

Web. 24 Sept. 2016. And when I was conducting the research for these argumentative point for this paper I hadn’t found many other strong argumentative points that I could have worked off of because this subject is somewhat biased due to there being many individuals not knowing enough about the goals of one side or not having all of the facts and