Evidenced Based Practice: Braden Scale Alexa M. Diaz Lienahard School of Nursing Pace University Word Count: 972 Introduction The Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk is a tool that assesses the risk for ulcers in six zones of the body: sensory perception, skin moisture, activity, mobility, nutrition, and friction/shear. Nurses and clinicians in settings such as acute, home, and long-term care places use this tool. There is no set time length to complete one of these assessments. The Braden Scale uses a score system where each item on the chart ranges from one to three or four; one signifying “highly impaired” and three/four signifying “no impairment”. The total amount of the score ranges from 6-23. The lower the score a patient displays, the higher at risk the patient is for developing a pressure ulcer. The cut-off point would be a score of 18 or less. Anything at or below this point means that the patient is at high risk for developing a pressure ulcer. A score of 19 or higher means that the patient is at low risk for developing a pressure ulcer. (Ayello. A. E., 2012) Clinical Problem Pressure ulcers often occur in hospitals and nursing homes (Ayello. A. E., 2012). As a result, the patient’s stay is extended and their medical bill inflates, in addition to their quality of life feeling diminished by the pain and infection (Ayello. A. E., 2012). Prevalence rates for pressure ulcers exist by 11.9% in acute care, 29.3% in long-term acute care,
Evidence suggests that pressure ulcers greatly increase mortality rates in both hospitals and nursing homes (Thomas, 2001). Patients who develop a pressure ulcer within six weeks of admission to an acute-care facility are three times more likely to die than patients who do not develop pressure ulcers (Thomas, 2001). Moreover, patients who develop a pressure ulcer within three months of admission to a long-term care facility are associated with a 92% mortality rate compared with a 4% mortality rate for patients who do not develop them (Thomas, 2001). This evidence alone shows how significant this problem is to the overall health status of patients. In my personal nursing experience, I have heard many complaints voiced from patients and their family members concerning the development of new pressure ulcers. Patients and family members have expressed dissatisfaction because of the increased stress and prolonged hospital stay often associated with the treatment of pressure ulcers.
The research article "What influences the impact of pressure ulcers on health-related quality of life? A qualitative patient-focused exploration of contributory factors" was recently published (2012) in the Journal of Tissue Viability by Gorecki, Nixon, Madill, Firth, and Brown. This is a qualitative study.
Treatment of a pressure ulcer costs the NHS more than £3.8 million, despite the progress and management of pressure ulcers 700,000 people are still affected this remains to be a significant problem for health care professionals (NHS Improvement, 2016). Therefore, this case study will enumerate the cause, treatment, prevention and risk factors of a pressure ulcer in relation to a patient who is suffering from a grade three-pressure ulcer to his sacrum and therefore requires long-term care from the district nurses. Pressure ulcers can occur more commonly on the sacrum or heels in any health care settings (Clarkson, 2007). Although more prevalent in the elderly, people of all ages are at risk of developing a pressure ulcer
Although the situation was quite challenging, it provided me with some useful experiences for the future practice. I understand that all institutions should have a policy for documenting the assessment of patients, including pressure ulcers (Morison 2001). I have come to be familiar with the homes assessment policy using the Sterling Pressure Sore Severity Scale and most importantly I have learned that by using a universal assessment tool it supports a systemic and consistent approach to pressure ulcer evaluation. This therefore supporting continuity of care.
Nurses need to realise what they are looking for when performing skin assessments for patients. A study conducted by Thoroddsen et al (2013), found that out of 45 patients that had pressure ulcers only 27 were correctly recorded in the patient’s records.
Thus, the expected outcome is that there is prevention of skin breakdown relating to pressure ulcers during hospitalizations for patients.
“Pressure ulcers are key clinical indicators of the standard and effectiveness of care (Elliott, Fox & McKinley, 2008).” L.M. was at high risk for pressure ulcers for multiple factors such as immobility, poor nutrition, age, and health. Therefore, I used the Braden Scale as a quality indicator in order to assess the risk of pressure ulcers and also to
To start the search for evidence within University Hospital, questions were asked in regards to pressure ulcers. Monthly updates are often sent out via email from the wound care team to keep everyone up to date on knowledge. While there was informative numbers within those updates, this information falls short according to Moore, Webster, & Samuriwo (2015). The main limitation of the study is the lack of a control group in pressure ulcer prevention and treatment. There is no clarity in the specific criterion that contributed to improved clinical outcomes. Teams used more than one method in the research project. Also, there is no study that meant the inclusion criteria in the random clinical trials. The lack of standardized
While nurses encounter patients with pressure ulcers in home care and acute care settings, they are mainly a problem with elderly adults in long term care facilities. This is because of decreased sensory perception, decreased activity and mobility, skin moisture from incontinence, poor nutritional intake, and friction and shear (Stotts and Gunningberg, 2007).
Braden scale (Braden & Makelburts, 2005) use in hospitals allows nurses to identify patients at risk for pressure ulcer based on their sensory perception, mobility, activity, moisture and nutrition. Although the Braden scale is a useful tool but healthcare administrations has yet found the best method to eliminate pressure ulcers or bedsore in intensive care units. The use of foam dressing will be introduced to the intensive
According to Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), 90% of all pressure ulcer related hospitalizations are due to secondary pressure ulcer diagnosis, 72% of patients are 65years or older and about 60,000 patients die each year as a result of a pressure ulcer. Some states legislation has declared secondary pressure ulcer as elderly abuse not covered by malpractice insurance. Fluid and
20). Further, the presence of pressure ulcers places a burden on patients and their family (Grinspun, 2005, p.21). As recommended by Grinspun (2005), pillows and foam wedges to separate prominences of the body and lifting devices have been beneficial to avoid friction (p. 32). Research suggests that the majority of pressure ulcers can be avoided. Although, the population at risk likely suffers from the possible contributors, as stated repositioning at least every 2 hours or sooner was effective (Grinspun, 2005, p. 32). When practicing I will reposition patients at appropriate times to reduce the risk of damage to the skin. Additionally, when moving a patient up in bed, I will request adequate assistance from other nursing staff to use a lifting device. This will help to avoid friction while the patient is being moved, ultimately reducing the development of pressure
According to Stockhausen & Conrick (2002), “Learning how to critique research articles is one of the fundamental skills of scholarship in any discipline” (p. 38). Burns & Grove (2011) found “An intellectual critical appraisal of a study involves a careful, complete examination of that study to judge its strengths, weaknesses, meaning, credibility, and significance for practice” (p. 419). The extent, amount and nature of publications accessible today by different means implies it has become crucial to prepare students and practitioners to judge the trustworthiness and helpfulness of published research (Stockhausen & Conrick, 2002, p. 38). The purpose of this report is critiquing a qualitative research article on pressure ulcers.
Pressure Ulcers affects patients the older patients due to the problem of immobility. A pressure
The INTACT trial showed a significant reduction in pressure ulcers (PU) incidence in the intervention group at the hospital (cluster) level, but this difference was not significant at the