Behavioral Differences Between Different Types Of Families

Behavioral genetics is the study of the different components within our personalities and what genes play a role in our personality traits. Many studies have been done related to our genes and our personality traits. Researchers have been unable to pinpoint one specific gene that is responsible for our personality traits, instead they have discovered that our personalities are due to several genes within our bodies. These “personality genes” have been heavily studied and through this it has been found that they have a relationship with a person’s political affiliation. A study was done which put 95 preschool students under a strict observation for seven months. The observation was done by their teachers and the teachers measured the children’s personalities and social interactions through a standardized test. The information recorded by the teachers was locked away for 20 years. After these two decades passed the 95 test subjects were asked to rate themselves on a five-point political spectrum. These ratings done by the test subjects showed a correlation between their personality traits as preschoolers and their current political affiliations. The people who considered themselves to be more conservative were “uncomfortable with uncertainty,” as preschoolers and the people who considered themselves to be more liberal were “expressive and energetic,” as preschoolers. This direct correlation between the test subjects personality traits and their political affiliations shows that our genetic makeup does relate back to our political behavior. Our personality traits play a huge role in differentiating us from other humans in the world; the average person could look at two people and understand that they are different by observing their personalities. Something an average person could not do is look at two people’s genes on a microscopic

Have you ever wondered why you are what you are? An old debate has been going on about weather your personality is affected by nature, your genes, or nurture, the way you were raised. Both nature and nurture play a part in your personality. Identical twin’s personality can be different from each other. My personality has changed from when I was born. Studies have proven the nurture is more effective. Nurture plays a bigger part in personality than nature.

Nature vs. Nurture The relative contributions of nature and nurture are an apparent part of human development which makes us ask the question, are heredity and environment opposing forces?(Sternberg 100) The question of nature vs. nurture can be examined and can be attempted to be comprehended in many ways. Our stand on which theory is the correct one is obviously a matter of opinion and makes us wonder if only one of them is truly correct. Nurture seems to be the explanation that holds the most tangible evidence to support it as existing in our everyday life. In psychological attempts to conduct experiments of genetic influences on personality and behavior in the environment psychologists have come to the conclusion that the best way is

An individual’s physical features can be identified as identical to the one that resembles his or her parents. The resemblance may feature the individual’s eyes from one of the parents. However, it is important to note that the personality and the talents of the individual may not be identical from the parents. This means that the environment in which the individual grew up may play part in the individual to have the talent or the personality. I believe that our behaviors are influenced by the environment that surrounds us. This because as the cultural aspects are changing, so as our behaviors changes too (Gander, 2003). It is important to note that the coding of the genes in each of the cell in the human beings is determined by the different

Every single person on Earth has their own distinct personality backed up by their behavior. But, how much is our personality is affected by the environment surrounding us? This debate has existed since 1869, when the phrase "Nature Versus Nurture" was created the English polymath, Francis Galton. On one side, there are those who argued that our personalities and traits are determined by our genetic model and DNA. On the opposite spectrum are the people agreeing with the nurture side of the debate, which argues that people are born with a mind as a “blank state”, where through learning and interactions with the surrounding environment, we gain an understanding of life. (Nature vs Nurture)

To what extent are we a product of innate, inborn tendencies, and to what extent are we a reflection of experiences and upbringing? This the famous “nature versus nurture” debate. For decades, psychologists have argued about the relative influence if heredity (genes) versus environment (experience) on thought and behavior. More recently, psychologists have begun studying the extent to which genetic differences only appear in specific environments, and the extent to which certain experiences only affect people with particular genetic predispositions (Champagne, 2009). This complex issue surfaces most clearly in our discussion of behavior genetics, intelligence, development, personality, and abnormal psychology (Morris & Maisto, p. 5).

Have you ever wondered why you act the way you do? Many people have spent their lives researching the important debate on whether parenting or genetics play the biggest role on the way people act today. Both nature and nurture play a big part in shaping someone's personality. Identical twins are different in many ways. My letters ESFP have changed a lot throughout my lifetime. Studies have shown that nurture is more dominant in a person’s personality than nature. In most cases nurture has a stronger influence on someone’s personality than nature does.

"Only in rare cases of extreme isolation is it possible to observe concretely separated two factors in the development of human personality which are always otherwise only analytically separated, the biogenic and the

Intelligence is defined by psychologists as “the ability to reason, plan, solve problems, think abstractly, comprehend complex ideas, learn quickly and learn from experience” (Dr. C. George Boeree 2003). It is an interesting aspect of the human being that psychologists try to understand in terms of the various factors that influence it. The variation in the level of intelligence in human beings is scored using the IQ. It is evaluated across a spectrum of perspectives ranging from biological, psychoanalysis, cognitive psychology, humanism and behaviorism. But the most debated is how nature and nurture influence intelligence. Nature follows with a biological approach focusing on genetic, hormonal and neuro-chemical explanations of behavior that are acquired, while nurture focuses on all behavior learnt from the environment through conditioning. “Nature is what we think of as pre-wiring and is influenced by genetic inheritance and other biological factors. Nurture is generally taken as the influence of external factors after conception e.g. the product of exposure, experience and learning on an individual” (Saul McLeod , 2007). How nature or nurture influence intelligence or which of them is more influential, is highly studied psychologists. Such studies have been attempted by using twins by isolating from their siblings, and evaluating whether genetic or environmental factors has influence on their intelligence. In their use, identical (monozygote) twins are separated and made to grow in different environmental conditions such as socioeconomic status, parents’ behavior, alcoholism, criminal behavior, emotional adaptation and nutrition while non-identical twins are used as controls. This is done by testing their IQ. (Nature vs Nurture in Intelligence, 2005)

The purpose of this paper is to provide evidence that nature and nurture play a formative role in human development and behavior patterns. In other words, this paper aims to describe the impact of biological and environmental factors on human personality traits and their behavioral tendencies. This is important in terms of sociology which focuses on human and social behavior and why certain individuals behave in a certain manner or do things in a distinct way. Understanding how nature and nature influence human behavior helps to shed light on the varying degrees that an individual is influenced by socialization, society, social norms, innate qualities, genetic traits and biological factors.

A number of recent twin studies have shown that our genes, to a surprising extent, influence behavior. Even matters that naturally seem to be a reflection of one’s personal experiences, such as political stance or religious views, have been proven by various studies to be largely controlled by genetics (Times Higher Education, 1997). Researchers at the University of Minnesota launched the Minnesota Twin Family Study in 1979, in which over a period of 20 years, they studied 137 pairs of twins – 81 of which were identical. Through this study, researchers found that about 70% of IQ variation across the twin population was due to genetic differences among people (LiveScience, 2014); a more recent study in 2009 also supported this. Behavioural

It has long been established that certain physical characteristics are biologically determined by genetic inheritance. Color of eyes, the texture and color of one’s hair, pigmentation of the skin and certain diseases are all a function of the genes we inherit.  Other physical characteristics, if not determined, appear to be at least strongly influenced by the genetic make-up of our biological parents. Characteristics such as height, weight, hair loss, life expectancy and vulnerability to specific illnesses are positively correlated between genetically related individuals.  These facts have led many to speculate as to whether psychological characteristics such as behavioral tendencies, personality attributes and mental abilities are also established in an individual before he is even

The nature vs. nurture debate on human behaviorisms has been decided one of the most contentious topics in the field of psychology. The controversy is based on the idea that our behavior, intelligence, personality, and emotions are either inherited through genes, or established through the environment. Are we simply born with destine personalities, or are they learned by experiences and observations? This started in 1582 when the British educator Richard Mulcaster stated, “Nature makes the boy toward, and nurture sees him forward”. This concept explores the contributions of our genetic inheritance and environmental influences that shape our thoughts and behaviors. It is so important because it is an attempt to determine where human morals have come from. The nature vs. nurture debate questions the actual free will humans exude. Individual thought might possibly not be as individual as everyone views it to be. The debate did not come into full effect until 1866, when Gregory Mendel introduced to the world that genes have an impact on human development. Genes such as down syndrome, color blindness, sickle cell disease, etc. guide the brain to take different approaches on certain situations. Every individual also inherits specific traits unique to their family genes including color of skin, hair, eyes, height, and even the shape of our face. These traits do not technically affect human behaviorism directly, but they do attract different reactions from the people around, rather

Nature, when viewed from a psychological perspective, is a term employed to characterize how humans inherently are (Mussen, Conger, Kagan, 1979). The general question concerning nature and personality is: “To what extent does nature play a role in one’s personality?” Unfortunately, no definitive methodological experiment has been conducted that can accurately determine which part of one’s personality comes from their genetic code. Theoretically speaking, if one’s personality were to be solely determined via genetics, then one would presume that their personality is a combination of their parents’. However, studies have shown that individuals differ in their reactivity to the environment; individuals differ in the processing of their experiences; individuals differ in characteristics; and individuals differ in how their environment shapes and selects their experiences (Rutter, 1997).

The topic of nature vs nurture effects on personality has been an ongoing psychology debate for many years with the support of both sides being divided between different disciples of psychology. The Nature Theory is based on the principle that the DNA inherited from our parents, which begins with a fertilized egg and evolves into a person, not only determines what we look like, but also contributes to our personality, the emotional person we are, and the behaviors we develop. In contrast, the Nurture Theory is based on the principle that the environment a person is exposed to, such as family and social surroundings, influence the behavior and personality they develop. Years of studies show that neither theory is solely responsible for who an