Beneficiaries Essay

Comprehensive immigration reform would have significant economic benefits for DACA recipients and American citizens. In

With evidence from different sources, this paper will show the how the DACA program effects the United States as a whole. “In 2010, in the whole u.s. Population, households with college education heads, on average, received $24,839

- Have at least 5-7 years experience with working as a commercial insurance underwriter, banker, or claims adjustment.

The last 10 years of U.S. economy can be seen by the impact of immigrant reform in different scenarios. In 2013, undocumented immigrants have been granted legal status; citizenship has helped to increase the U.S. GDP and would accumulate by an additional $1.4 trillion compared to the 10 years in between the 2013 to 2022. This earning will give a chance for the Americans some additional earnings of $791 billion at the same period as a personal income, in which the economy would create job opportunities, about 203,000 new jobs per year. In these years the undocumented immigrants will earn about 25.1 percent more than the current earnings of the immigrants. These earnings show that they will be contributing significantly to the federal, local, and state taxes which will add to tax revenue in 10 years with $185 billion to $116 billion for the USA federal government as well as $68 billion to the state and local government (Stuart Anderson,2011).

Immigration policies on DACA can have significant impact on the economy of the United States. DACA protect more than 800,000 dreamers who were brought illegally to United States for temporary work and education. Trump administration has proposed to end DACA. Ending DACA means these children will be sent back to their respective countries. Most of dreamers are studying in colleges or are working and contributing to state and federal government in terms of taxes. Ending DACA could lead to loss of major chunk of GDP. Editor from americanprogress.org named Tom K.Wong wrote in his article “DACA has been

With the credentials that they obtain from university, the recipients of the program are worlds ahead of where they would have been without DACA. In the same study by the Center for American Progress, it was determined that DACA moved 50,000 to 75,000 unauthorized immigrants into employment and thus improved their income. The respondents of the survey reported that sixty-nine percent of them had moved to a job with better pay, and fifty-four percent of them had gone to a job better fit for their education. Overall, with DACA, ninety-one percent of the respondents in the survey that had received DACA were in a position of employment (Giovanni 1). Due to the fact that the income of the DACA recipients was increased because of employment opportunities, the Dreamers are able to purchase homes. The employment opportunities provided for Dreamers through DACA are able to benefit them in a way that allows for national

Supposing that DACA stays, many businesses would have an easier time searching for qualified employees since there are a huge number of Dreamers in the US that have an excellent level of education.

DACA does help it's recipients acquire a work permit, Social Security number, State ID, open a bank account and apply for scholarships. But what about the 12 million undocumented immigrants that are not fortunate enough to qualify for the program. These immigrants have no work permit forcing them to undergo poor working conditions, below minimum wage salaries, no benefits, and long exhausting hours to support their families. They have to work harder because the price of losing their jobs is higher. Not to mention that illegal immigrants paid $13 billion in just payroll taxes for benefits they can't receive (Welfare, Food Stamps, etc.) as well as sales and property taxes they pay whenever they purchase clothing, gas, or rent for their

The author, Frosty Wooldridge, of The Children of Undocumented Immigrants, 2013 deplores Edwin Rubenstein of the National Research Center reported in 2008 that unlawful immigrants are having an astronomical negative effect in terms of $346 billion annually on the American taxpayers (par. 5). The author, Frosty Wooldridge, argues that the undocumented immigrants are wasting these taxpayers’ money. Also, the author underscores that these undocumented immigrants do not know how much it costs taxpayers every year for them to live here illegally. It may be true that the undocumented immigrants are not paying their taxes. However, the undocumented immigrants are spending money to help stimulate the economy. According to a website article, “DACA Recipients’ Economic and Educational Gains Continue to Grow” from the Center for American Progress website finds “The data illustrate that DACA recipients continue to make positive and significant contributions to the economy, including earning higher wages, which translates into higher tax revenue and economic growth that benefits all Americans. In addition, DACA recipients are buying cars, purchasing their first homes and even creating new businesses” (par. 3). The author establishes that the undocumented immigrants have been making the economy better by earning higher wages. Additionally, these undocumented immigrants are increasing the economy by acquiring essential things like cars and homes. The author implies that because of DACA, these undocumented immigrants, are in fact, benefiting the economy immensely with earning higher wages and purchasing homes and cars. Another powerful illustration of this point again specifying on the Center for American Progress website was concluding that important data is showing that many of the top 25 Fortune 500 companies are hiring DACA individuals accounting for $2.8 trillion annually

The United States of America was founded by immigrants, and immigrants have made it what it is today. Recently the question, “ Is it right for President Trump to repeal DACA?” has come up. Everyone has shown that this is now an easy decision because on one side we have these children so scared of leaving the United states and being sent to a country they do not know. On the other side these children were brought over illegally. So the answer to this question is no, it is not right for Trump to send these people back. First, America is there home. Second, over a billion dollars a year would be lost due to the money the Dreamers would not be paying

From a study done in March of 2011, well over sixty percent of latin american immigrants are in or near poverty(Camarota 1). DACA recipients get help from federal taxpayer money to help them have a better life. To shift the United State’s focus away from the use of taxpayer money to support undocumented immigrants and more towards the support of legal U.S citizens, because the United States should focus more on people that have earned their right to be in the United States and less on people who had

DACA, also known as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrival, has influenced the way many immigrants live in the United States. It is a very important topic since it affects more than 700,000 people in the United States. It has become a more relevant topic in today’s news since congress wants to take DACA away, affecting thousands of people, especially the Dreamers. According to DACA Information “It started on June 17, 2007, and it allowed people to receive a renewable two year permission to stay in the country, only allowing the people under 31 and born on June 15, 1981 and after” (Lal). This program has separated many children from the parents.

In the article, For DACA Recipients, Losing Protection and Work Permits Is Just The Start, by Caitlyn Dickerson, it targets and examines the outcome of what will happen to those who are under the DACA program and how their lives will change in just a blink of an eye. To all of these immigrants who fled their countries and took their loved ones with them in hopes of trying to what are their countries and took their loved ones with them in hopes of trying to create a better life for themselves, DACA was seen as one of many opportunities that would be presented it to them. One of the privileges of being under the DACA program would be that these people would get to live their dreams of living in the United States and being able to work and provide

Besides the fact that these immigration reforms would raise the wages, they would also ensure that the current labor force would sufficiently meet the demands of the ever growing society. The fact that they would significantly increase the wages also implies that the purchasing power or rather demand of the consumers would be increased (Porter, 2013). An increase in aggregate demand implies an increase in output. The economy would be better placed. With reference to the federal budget on the other hand, government expenditure on consumer welfare would be reduced. The impact on the federal budgetary reform in this case is direct, the immigration policies, in the long term, would be the reduction in terms of government expenditure. The Bipartisan Policy Center recently released a report that substantiates the impact of the immigration reform on the federal budget. The report categorically stated that, ‘effective immigration reform can be a powerful instrument of economic revitalization. By increasing the overall population and particularly the number of working-age labor-force participants, reform can help expand the economy.’ The impact of the immigration policy states in the report that the immigration policy would increase economic growth, lower the deficit in the federal budget, increase the size for labor force, increase the demand for housing due to an increase in terms of the population and on the long term, raise the wages. This will offer the US economy and the federal budget a much-needed boost. The impact of the immigration policy on the federal budget therefore comes with its own benefits but it is important to note that the primary benefits will be noted in the long run (Preston,

The authors Grant and Dutton conducted the study Beneficiary or Benefactor because it led them to believe there are reasons as when reflecting on being a beneficiary not been sufficient for promoting good behavior, where individuals are more inclined to initiate and sustain prosocial behavior. Causing an individual on reflecting on benefits given rather than benefits received. Therefore, the authors wanted to understand how reflection, by expressing their writing in journals can influence good behavior; affecting interpersonal actions, and not only individual experiences. Since past research, such as the ones conducted by Cialdini & Goldstein, 2014, Desteno, Bartlett, Baumann, Williams and Dickens, 2010, and fisher, 1982 where done. This