Benefits Of Lowering Voting Age

If the voting age was lowered, this would help to fix that issue. As said earlier, 16-year-olds are much more likely to vote than 18-year-olds. Also, they are more likely to continue to vote later in life if they start earlier!

The voting age should be increased to 19 or 21 years of age. Most 18 year olds have just graduated or are still in highschool, so many of them are immature,and lack life experience. In addition, many 18 year olds do not have a plan(s) after high school, so if they can’t make a decision about their future what makes people think that they can make an informed decision about the future of the country. However, there are some states like Ohio that are allowing seventeen year olds to vote in primaries.

I personally don't have much political experience because my parents don't vote. Therefore I don't really care much about voting. If kids aren't exposed to politics or informed on why they should vote then I don't believe decreasing the voting age will make much of a difference. If 18-year-olds do not have a high number of votes I don't see how kids younger than that would make a difference. I don't believe lowering the age is solution to increases voters. I think we should focus more on teaching the importance of voting and why it makes a difference so that when they do turn 18 they will understand why they should vote and by understanding that I believe they will be more likely to

I agree that the voting age should be lowerd to the age of 16.Simply because they do have mature 16 year olds.To me it's like the passage says "There is nothing magical about the age 18." In my opinion ,if they are allowing 16 year olds to complete high early, that shows that they have the brains to know who to vote for obviously. I've seen most 16 year olds in this generation willing to want to vote than the older generation. So I think the age should be lowerd to those 16 year olds whom have completed high school though. If many countries have already done so, then I think this is the one time America should also follow.I think the turnout would be more higher if the age was lowered.Another thing I agree with from the passage is that "Lowering

Imagine, you’re sixteen years old, you can drive, you have a job, you pay taxes, you can be tried in court as an adult, yet you have no voice when it comes to the elections. Because of this, the minimum voting age should be reduced to 16.

There are many concerns that might be brought upon if Congress chooses to lower the voting age in the U.S from 18 to 16. Many could assume that 16-year-olds are not competent enough to make mature and informed decisions. They could either choose to not vote or vote the way their parents tell them to vote. There have been past issues with lowering the voting age in America from 21 to 18. Dissatisfaction among many people could cause a huge conflict if lowering the voting age to 16. Although, we must weigh out the pros and cons of lowering the voting age. This will possible affect the voter turnout in a positive way. For those who vote earlier in life can possible develop a habit of voting in the near future. As of right now, we have a low

In my position I agree to lower the age of voting to 16-17 years old because it can raise up the percentage of voting. Many people are not voting because they don't believe it can help them and their community also with the support from 16-17 years old, it can show a huge difference on how the votes are increasing little by little. Also it can gives them experience on what's the voting like. Once they get older, they will know what to do because they registered the vote in an

There have been many advantages and disadvantages to the change in the age requirement to vote. Currently the biggest disadvantage has been the voter participation percentage, followed by the demographic of the voters. With the age requirement being lowered to 16 the negatives may out weigh the postive.

. I personally don't feel the legal voting age should be changed in any way. When an individual turns eighteen they are able to make an informed decision. If the age was to be lowered, I feel the younger voters would be influenced by their parent or other authorative figures the individual looks up to. However, it is shown in "Keeping the Voting Age at 18", that younger voters tend to be less involved in voting. Which shows that if the age was to be lowered, it more than likely wouldn't affect the outcome of the vote. However, if the age was to be lowered, that would create more room for misinformed votes. Which in the long run would affect the outcome of the campaign. I also feel that to vote, one must understand the intentions of the person

It may be thru that lower the age on voters may increase the participation on the voting process, but we should not only think about numbers, we also want people to vote knowing what are the implications of choose a party and vote for it. Peolpe who vote needs to be concience of witch are the differences between partys, the ideas for each participant on the election going on, so, if we think about this metter, at the age of 16 our kids are not really intersted in politics or a lot less in how the people who may wing will run the country. If we see that in other countries lower the age to vote has

I will be giving you the pros and cons of each opinion. So that maybe you can decide for yourself which would be a better outcome. Lets start with why people believe the voting age should be lowered. Some say there should be balance between the ederly and other groups. By 2050 scientists say 27% of voters will be over the age of 65.

To begin with, lowering the voting age would probably decrease the percentage of participation. it also won`t help the percentage go up either. For example, young voters don`t take things like voting seriously. Some of the young voters don`t even care about voting. So there is no point in letting the current voting age be lowered.

From information online and personal opinion from my family, I found some pretty good pros and cons. Pros, Voter turnout may increase. If the voting age is to be lowered, more people would show up and v More voices could mean more innovation, “With more people involved in politics, the next generation may provide new insights and ideas, to contribute to the public debate and discussion.” (News Max) Cons, young people tend to be easily persuaded by fellow peers, online resources, and family members, “Tennagers around the age of 16, are lacking experience and knowledge, and are likely to be manipulated by other,” this also supports both paragraphs 1 and 2. Teens are also not informed enough, “High school students tend not to pay attention to current political events,” which decreases the chances of them having enough knowledge on who to vote for.

Along with creating a “trickle up” effect, lowering the voting age would increase the voting field by getting more people voting from the start. Lowering the voting age would also positively affect the voting field by getting more people to vote from the start. Studies show that voting is a habit and that decreasing the voting age to 16 sixteen would increase the number of people voting from the start. This is exemplified in Scotland, where 16 and 17 sixteen and seventeen-year-olds became eligible to vote in 2014. That year, 75% of those aged 16 and 17 sixteen and seventeen voted, where only 53% of 18-24 those eighteen through twenty-four years in age year olds voted (Why the Voting Age).

Voting has become a massive issue in recent years. The number of people voting is declining, so elections are changing a lot. Another significant change that could take place in voting would be to lower the voting age. The right to vote has been a very controversial topic in recent years, and there has been some heated debate whether it should or should not. The point of view shown here is that it should decrease. There are many reasons why it the age of 18 should be reduced which currently is the voting requirement and has been since 1971 when the 26th Amendment came into effect.