preview

Bicycle Thieves: An Italian Neorealism Film

Good Essays

Bicycle Thieves by Vittorio De Sica, 1948, was an Italian Neorealism film. It not only changed cinema, but it used cinema to approach reality in Italy during that time period. There are many differences between Italian Neorealism films and Hollywood Cinema.
In the first scene when Ricci gets a job, it begins with a bus passing by to see a group of unemployed, working class men, waiting for a job. The audience is introduced to the social context first; to show us that real life is still going on, a key feature in Italian neorealism because Italian neorealism films are based on non-fiction stories. The audience is then introduced to the main character, Ricci. Ricci is sitting away from the group of unemployed men, showing us that he is defeated, …show more content…

Towards the end of the film after Ricci has spent his day trying to find the bike that was stolen from him, he heads towards the big stadium in Italy, walking in front of his son, forgetting his son is there because he is lost in his thoughts. Ricci is desperate, and lost hope in finding the bike that was stolen from him. Desperate to keep his job and provide for his family, he tells his son to get on the next bus, and plans to steal a bike. Ricci’s son misses the bus and witnesses his father steal the bike and a bunch of men chase after him, catching him. Close up shots are a technique used often in Hollywood films, but is rarely used in Italian neorealism films. Close up shots were used here to show the devastation in Ricci’s face of not being to able to have a bike to keep his job and provide for his family, but also embarrassed that his son witnessed it. These close up shots of Ricci’s face are not held for too long, and match cuts are used between his face and his son’s face, to show the audience the loss of respect the son had for his father, but to also show the son holding his father’s hand because he loves his father even if he did wrong. This scene ends the film with an unhappy ending, something not seen in Hollywood …show more content…

Or to put it another way, his technique is not merely technical. An acknowledged master of film form, Almodóvar exploits mise-en-scène, cinematography, and editing to unexpected effects” (959). What he is saying is that, technique can be used to work with or against the film, but Almodóvar uses different cinematographic and mise-en-scene, techniques than many other filmmakers do to show the emotional significance of film in a different way. Camera movement in films is often mobile, and when it is moving, it foreshadows that life is about to change. In the scene where Manuela and Esteban watch television in their living room, they are kept in the same frame, the camera not moving away from them. This shows the audience that they’re a family, but soon, that will end. During the film, the most mobile scenes are of Manuela on her way to Barcelona. Close up shots are used here to indicate her son is no longer with her, and that she is alone. They then cut quickly from Manuela, to the tunnel, and then to the train zooming by, but no shot being held for too long. Almodóvar also doesn’t hold emotional scenes of the characters in one shot for too long. When Manuela tells Rosa her son died, the door then shuts, leaving the audience on the outside where they can no longer see Manuela’s face, but they can hear her cry. In Hollywood cinema, emotional scenes are often held longer, tied with close up shots so

Get Access