preview

Blood Libels During The Holocaust

Decent Essays

“The Jews are trying to destroy all other cultures as a survival mechanism”. This quote was spoken by David Duke, an anti semite who believe in racism and denies the holocaust. David Duke is the proof that Jews have been lied against and are hated. This quote reflects on the history of the Jews who have been killed over the centuries through lies and propaganda. Blood Libels during the MIddle Ages and propaganda during the Holocaust used lies in order to persuade the killings of the Jews, however the Christians during the Blood Libels could have thought the Jews did something wrong and had trials while the Nazi’s just hated them and killed them without trials.
They were many tools of propaganda that Hitler and the Nazi’s used to kill six million …show more content…

The Blood Libels were the accusations that Jews killed a young christian boys for ritual reasons. It represented that the Jews were still responsible for the killing of Jesus and was based off the assumption that Jews hate other people, especially Christians. This led to mass killings of the Jews in the Middle Ages. The Nazi's also used the blood libels for propaganda in the holocaust. During the second century BCE, there was a big controversy between Hellenism and the Jews. Greeks would say the Jews would steal a Greek, fatten him up, and then kill him to eat them. This was told by Apion and King Antiochus since the king “found” a Greek in the Beit Hamikdash being “fattened up”. Most suspect this was just so that the king would have a justification for burning the Beit Hamikdash. People suspect this fable could have been one of the sources for where the idea of the Blood Libel came. The second Crusades also could have set a precedent for the blood libels. People say one of the ways the Blood Libels could have come about was a misinterpretation of when the Jews killed their own kids during the Blood libels. Jews did it because they said it's better to die by their hand than be killed by the Christians. Another reason the Blood libels may have been would be because the Christians themselves were accused of Blood Libels. People said early Christianity used a “divine child” to put …show more content…

In Germany, Streicher used his newspaper as a way to get back at Jews. He used it to get back at his nemesis, Hermann Luppe, by accusing one of his Jewish employs during World war One. He accused the Jew, Julius Fleischmann, of stealing stocks from his quartermaster during combat. Julius sued and won but he ruined his reputation in the middle of it. Streicher was fined 900 marks and because of Julius's lost reputation his new motto was "Something always sticks.” While the newspaper was hating on the Jews, there was propaganda with an art exhibit for the wandering Jew. At the time it was it was the largest Nazi propaganda. It has a picture of a Jew wearing a Kaftan with a whip in one hand and gold in the other with a map of the world under his arm with a hammer and sickle on it. The exhibit had pictures of typically "Jewish" features of politics like Charlie Chaplin and Leon Trotsky. In the areas the exhibit went there were police reports of violence against the Jews. Even though the Nazis just plain hated the Jews, the Christians could have thought the Jews did so something wrong. On the night of the Spanish Inquisition, there was the blood libel of the Holy Child of La Guardia in 1490-1491. There, Jews who were converted to Christianity were tortured and forced to confess lies. They said with the

Get Access