Book Report on Apology
In the “Apology”, Socrates tackles his accusers against certain accusations made against him in the Court of Law of Athens, Greece. The nature of the accusation that has caused him to stand trial is such that “Socrates is an evil-doer, and a curious person, who searches into things under the earth and in heaven, and he makes the worse appear the better cause; and he teaches the aforesaid doctrines to others” (Plato. The Republic and other plays. pg-449. Doubleday publishing; New York- 1989). Socrates begins with first identifying the type of accusers he has, which consist of those who are in direct contention with him, the primary accusers, since they are the ones who contrived the accusations. Then there
…show more content…
pg-454). He then explains that if he was corrupting others, he too would have been corrupted long ago and there would be no good left. Also he rebuttals the charge of not believing in Gods while believing in higher divinities. The charge, he shows how ludicrous was indeed in nature since how can anyone believe in flute playing and not the flute player (Plato, pg-457). How can one believe in spiritual and divine agencies, and not in spirits or demigods? But ultimately Socrates’ defense is his self-lessness. He attributes his deeds to his duty towards God. He makes it clear that the obligation to truth is far more closer to God than any other social one that is marked by malice. His poverty, his unchanging and impartial ways that he followed all his life to search for the truth and when having found it, give it to others without taking into consideration what the government in power would say or do about it in itself is an evidence and a virtue that rises above all others to prove him innocent. His defense is simple and artless because it is the truth, within which some more properties emerge. One of these can be identified as the simplicity of truth and the other is its universality. Truly, although several impugn Socrates of wrong-doing and misguiding the youth, he was not the first or the last one tried on such a charge. This points to the nature of truth to be unchanging. Despite all the advances a society may claim to having
In Paul, the Spirit, and the People of God, Gordon Fee outlines a theology of the Spirit in the Divine Trinity, the basis within Scripture for the experience of the Spirit, and the interaction of the two. Fee, a Pentecostal scholar, “redefines the terms of discussion about the Holy Spirit in a way that transcends today’s
And he supplements this with his second premise- if he did want to live amongst those he corrupted; it could only be because he was mad, and therefore unintentional. He reasons that those who are mad should not be killed, but institutionalized instead.
“I think we are wasting our time. Look at kid’s record…. he stabbed somebody in the arm.” By looking at the previous records of the boy, we cannot claim that he’s guilty. False argument and attack on person.
The charges against Socrates were brought upon him by a man names Meletus. Meletus was a young man that Socrates did not know very well. These charges brought on by Meletus caused the indictment of Socrates. One of the charges in the affidavit written by Meletus against Socrates is that he is "corrupting the youth." Another charge that is brought upon Socrates is that of he is making up new Gods and disregarding the old Gods the Athenians believe in. These were the charges brought on Socrates.
His aim was to use this method of doubting everything you know to discover what we actually do know for certain. So we can prove them.
Socrates was a great philosopher of the Greek world. He was quite an atypical and distinctive person. Being different from all the other philosophers of the land, Socrates was teaching his students ideas totally out of the ordinary from what the society believed was right. As a result, he displeased many people so much that they decided to get rid of him. Socrates was put to trial, accused of spoiling the youth of Athens, tried and sentenced to death. His personal defense is described in works two of his students: Xenophon and Plato. Both of them wrote papers called Apology, which is the Greek word for “defense”. In this essay I used Apology by Plato as the main resource, since it contents a more full account of the trial of Socrates and
In Plato’s: The Apology Socrates was charged and put on trial for impiety, as well as accused of committing many other crimes. I will first explain the most important issues of why Socrates was sent to death. Then I will argue the position that Socrates is innocent, and should not be have been found guilty.
He had the reasoning and understanding of what he did, but he still went through with killing an elderly couple.
Socrates was a former infantryman, having fought in three campaigns during the war with Sparta, so it is no surprise that he believed justice should not be invoked by the citizens’ pleading. He
However, the fact that he must hire goons and he cannot do it himself shows that he has not fully conceded to the evil force. Also, when he sees the ghost of Banquo at the table and freaks out we can clearly see that he is not ok with what he has done. He says to the ghost, “Thou canst say that I did it. Never shake thy gory locks at thee”(III.iv.55,56). These are not the words of a guilt-free man. He does, at this point, feel remorse.
He is obstructed from his genuine rational moral view and if he were morally coherent, he would have seen that taking such drastic action removes himself from his genuine thoughts.
In Plato’s Apology Socrates explains to the jury the reasons he should be found not guilty against his accused crimes. Although none of the accusations have any true merit Socrates is forced into the courtroom. During his defense Socrates states, “A man who really
Ladies and Gentlemen of the jury, today I am here to present to you why my client, Socrates of Athens, is in fact an innocent man in the charges pressed by Meletus, Anytus, and Lycon. I will first list the reasons for his upbringing in this court, then I will prove them to be invalid and self contradictory based on the words of his accusers themselves, and following this discrediting of charges I will explain what my client's true intentions are because it seem that reason why we are really here today is primarily based on the fact that my client’s accusers have misconstrued the love and respect that Socrates has for Athens.
Socrates was charged with impiety he does not believe in the gods whom the people believes in he is portrayed as an atheist and he speculates about the heaven and thing beneath the ground, he seeks natural explanation for astronomical and geological phenomena rather than the gods and also he corrupts the youth he infuses in them a spirit of criticism his questioning of authority had effects on the youth. He makes the weaker reason seem to be stronger.
truth of his theory of evolution." In the world of Galileo proof was what was