Boston Massacre Dbq Analysis

The British soldiers were anything but loved by the American colonists in the 1770s. They maliciously planned an attack on the soldiers because of their hate. Many townspeople gathered together in effort to strike against the British presence. The men were just doing their job trying to keep order in Boston, but the people still taunted them. The soldiers were being tried for murder because they fired at the people, but those charges should not have existed. The crowd initially attacked the soldiers, not the other way around. It was also dark out so the soldiers did not know of the number of colonist attackers. The soldiers heard the word fire coming from the crowd, confusing the voices with Captain Preston’s. The incident referred to as the

After analyzing the video about the Boston Massacre, what it should be called depends all on which side you took. Patriots would have took this as a massacre because, not only would it blame the British, but their people were also considered "slaughtered". Thus, to the Patriots, this would be considered a massacre. However, for the Loyalists and British, this would be considered a riot. A crowd of colonists threw snowballs, stones, oyster shells, and even wood at British soldiers. This was basically a disturbance of peace, or a riot. The soldiers had the right of defending themselves, so I do understand the reasons for shooting, but killing wasn't necessary. In the end however, in my opinion, without being biased to any sides, the Boston Massacre should be considered a riot.

William Wyatt and Captain Thomas Preston had very different accounts on what happened at the Boston Massacre. Wyatt said that he was in Boston, when he heard the bells ring, which usually indicated that there is a fire. He ran up too the Town-house, where he saw soldiers and their officer, who was telling them to load their guns and then proceeded to tell the soldiers to fire. When they did not fire, he told them to fire again, until someone did and after everyone fired and killed townspeople, the officer yelled "Damn ye, rascals, what did ye fire for?" Wyatt also mentioned that the towns people did not throw anything at the soldiers.

The Boston Massacre took place on March 5th, 1770. This historic event was caused because of an ongoing conflict between the British soldiers and the people of Boston. According to George Hewes account, “Crowds of artisans and laborers joined the elite in protesting British policies, although their differing points of view revealed the divisions within colonial society.” People were upset over the British passing the Towsend Act, which was a surplus of unpopular taxes. The people of Boston also resented the British troops, who were also looking for jobs.

The “massacre” that happened on March 5th changed a lot of opinions of the colonist’s about how they felt about the British. The way that the picture was made, in relation to the story was key in winning the hearts of the Americans. The story told is depicting confusion on the officer’s part, and they randomly fired on the crowd, not in any particular area. The picture shows that the British were organized, and aimed to kill. Since it is easier to get the story from a picture, the picture was that the troops have a desire to kill the people, shown with the organization. This picture portrays the British as murderers, all the more reason to unite and rise against and go to war against. (DCT 3)

Similar to the way that the colonial and British perspectives greatly varied for the Boston Massacre, their opinions are once again vastly different for the Battles of Lexington and Concord. In this event as well, both parties attempt to place the blame on the other which is not unusual due the nature of the sources. However, this highlights the large amount of bias evident in all of the accounts. For the colonial perspective, there are two statements, each from a member of a colonial militia that fought during the Battles of Lexington and Concord. Both of these sources place the blame on the British soldiers and claim that the British fired first, killing several colonists. One account, from the Battle of North Bridge, claims that the colonists were ordered to hold their fire and that they didn’t fire until the British opened fire upon them. The other account, from soldier who fought during the skirmish at the Lexington Green, states that the colonists did not even get a single shot off, at least not before the soldier whose account this is was wounded. This source also claims that the British commanding officers were yelling at and insulting the colonists as their ranks closed on the milita. Both these sources are very similar to the colonial perspectives of the Boston Massacre because they all place the blame on the British soldiers and attempt to make themselves appear as the victims.

The colonists used propaganda to invoke anger in the colonists. Document 1, which is an engraving of the Boston Massacre by Paul Revere depicts the colonists as helpless bystanders that were shot down by the British soldiers. In the engraving, colonists are shown unarmed in the town square. This leads the viewer to believe that the British were the only ones with clubs and other weapons. The engraving depicted the colonists as the victims as a way of getting

I am writing to express my opinion about the events that occurred March 5, 1770 in Boston. I feel very strongly that the blame rests solely on the nine British soldiers that fought in the massacre. These soldiers were much to harsh to the colonists were involved in this fight, and had no right to fire a gun at these innocent colonists trying to stand up for their rights of privacy, as well as just rights in general. I believe that the world should know what really happened on March 5, 1770 in the streets of Boston. I hope that you should continue reading to find out more.

On March 5, 1770...The Boston Massacre, known as the Incident on King Street by the British, was an incident on March 5, 1770, in which British Army soldiers shot and killed people while under attack by a lot of colonists. There was not a  massacre on March 5, 1770 in Boston because. According to the sources B,C and D say that the colonists had weapons and they were also attacking in the massacre. The evidence that supports my claims is that in documents B,C,D the colonists are clearly seen with weapons according to the documents with the gazette, it said that the colonists had weapons and were involved in the fight. This supports my own opinion because in document b the colonists are seen with some type of sword or golf club. My second reason

After the Boston Massacre the Sons of Liberty called it a battle for American liberty and just cause for removal of british troops from Boston. Then a patriot named Paul Revere had the infamous midnight run and was going to Concord to warn Patriot leaders.Paul was caught and was stranded near Lexington. When later the “Shot heard round’ the world” started the American Revolution, the Sons had formed the first armies known as militias. Then when the battles had erupted The leaders of the Sons like Samuel Adams, Paul Revere, John Hancock, Benjamin rush, and Oliver Wolcott then became the leaders of the war along with people like George Washington.

“Between the hours of nine and ten o’clock, being in my master’s house, was alarmed by the cry of fire, I ran down as far as the town-house, and then heard that the soldiers and the inhabitants were fighting in the alley… I then left them and went to King street. I then saw a party of soldiers loading their muskets about the Custom house door, after which they all shouldered. I heard some of the inhabitants cry out, “heave no snow balls”, others cried “they dare not fire”. The Boston massacre has been no massacre it was propaganda. The incident that happened March 5th, 1770 in the streets of Boston only killed five people and had six people with non fatal injuries. There were

Before the French and Indian War, the British ruled over the colonies in America very lightly. The colonists created their own taxes and practically ruled themselves. Britain prospered from all of the trade flowing between itself and its colonies. This system worked out very well until a war started in the American colonies of Britain against the colonies of France. After the French and Indian War, the British had debts that they needed to pay off, and since it was fought partially in the American colonies, the colonies needed to help pay for some of the war debts. Parliament established taxes on the colonies, which infuriated the rich land owners in the colonies. Some of the elite landowners formed a group called the Sons of Liberty, who wrote letters to Parliament and the King of Britain, asking them to rethink the taxation laws that they had placed upon the colonies. Surprisingly, Parliament decided to repeal that tax but then applied a new tax. This happened one more time before King George

Primary Source: Depicted by the drawing of the Boston Massacre by Paul Revere, the colonists are victimized and surrounding colonists (Country-bound) would most likely oppose the British for their actions due to the event, depicted by Paul Revere in a drawing (Paul Revere, Drawing).

The Incident on King Street is not well known in America but if one was to bring it up in Great Britain the British could talk for days. In America, “The Incident on King Street” is well known as the Boston Massacre. The Boston Massacre is a crucial event in America's early history and is a leading factor in our freedom from Great Britain. It is a leading cause for the American Revolution and made people look at British rule in a different light. According to Hiller B. Zobel, author of The Boston Massacre “... we realized that our country's freedom grew from bloodshed.” The Boston Massacre occurred on March 5th, 1770, but events lead up to an accident of this severity for months, and even years before. With rulers who ruled from thousands of miles away, it was hard to understand the needs and wants of the colonist in America. Although the main goal from the rulers in Great Britain was to collect money from the colonist, the colonist had different goals in mind.

LEXINGTON and CONCORD, MA- In yesterday’s early hours, a force of British regulars, commanded by General Thomas Gage, marched out of Boston searching for a weapons cache in the town of Concord. These troops met a little resistance in Lexington on their way through. When getting to Concord, the Royal Forces found few arms, but found a force of Minutemen awaiting them. These Minutemen chased the regulars all the way back to Boston, all while the Minutemen’s numbers steadily grew. The Minutemen had been warned of the surprise raid by the efforts of three riders that had set out from Boston ahead of the regulars. This was instrumental in the Minutemen’s victory because the regulars were not expecting that anyone would have enough time to organize resistance since this was supposed to be a surprise raid.