Broad Differentiation Strategy : Converse, Reebok, And Nike

The Rivalry among competing sellers of sporting goods such as Under Armour, Nike, and Adidas-Reebok is strong and likely to intensify. The rivalry among sporting good sellers of energy will keep growing and will become stronger in coming years. Under Armour. Nike, and Adidas-Reebok have similar or competing product offerings and that is why competition among them is so high. If these companies want to stay in business they need to come up with different strategies that will set them apart from the opposition. Competition is intense and revolves around performance,

Nike; one of the most well known companies across the globe today is most known for being the world’s #1 shoemaker. They design and sell shoes for a variety of sports including baseball, golf, tennis and football. Nike also sells dress and casual shoes as well as athletic apparel and equipment for almost every sport imaginable. In addition Nike also operates NIKETOWN shoe and sportswear stores, factory outlets along with Nike women shops. One of Nike’s biggest competitors on the rise is Under Armour, Inc. Under Armour; the primary maker of performance athletic underwear and apparel has risen to the top with main competitor Nike. The company has also begun to become a factor in the footwear market as

The added revenue from intersecting with other markets removes some of the stress of competing in a highly saturated market. As mentioned earlier, a company and its products need to evolve with the market and technology surrounding them. That evolution isn’t just the product but its integration with the current marketing model to show the sponsored athlete winning in their UA HOVR. This product and products similar are necessary for Under Armour if they want to remain successful and hold on to their share of the market and continue their exploration of other converging

Under Armour should exercise a focused, differentiated approach by exclusively developing performance apparel. Its non-standardized products are good for customers who prefer performance than price. For this reason, the corporation should have more emphasis on research and development to offer products, which are superior to what is in the market. On the other hand, its focus strategy should aim at particular sports, serving each sport’s needs more precisely than the broad apparel companies like Adidas and Nike. Combining a focus differentiation strategy will enable the firm to create a fertile niche positioning meanwhile meeting the customer’s specific needs (Kenyon,

Under Armour is in the Textile- Apparel Clothing industry, in the consumer goods sector. The market has been driven by economic recovery, new product offerings and a

Under Armour is a very popular and well-known brand throughout the world, there are many reasons why this is the case and why they are very successful as a company. Under Armour creates value for their customers in many ways, one of these ways is with their basketball shoes. Customers wouldn't want to buy shoes if they didn't think it would be durable and a good shoe. Customers can trust Under Armour’s basketball shoe because it is a shoe that somebody in the NBA wears. This shows that someone is willing to trust their million-dollar contract with their shoes to help them get their well-earned money, and that shows to confidence in Under Armour. Under Armour also gives many different options that the customer can choose from. They offer different technologies, materials, and articles of clothing. There are many different technologies they have, but I will only list a few. One of these technologies is cool switch, this helps athletes perform longer because the clothing will keep them cool and save them from sweating as much which helps save energy. Also, they offer many different materials in case a customer is allergic to a certain type of material there is always another so that they don't lose a customer. They also offer all different types of clothing so that whatever you need they'll have. Based on this research it proves that Under Armour has done so much to get where they are and be as successful as they are.

a. Under Armour’s approach towards innovation is very unique, they think and plan out their projects thoroughly in order to create a one of a kind product that could be appealing to their consumers. The company has been extremely progressive throughout the years in order to stay ahead of the other competitive companies in their targeted industry. By constantly updating and coming up with different product lines, such as compression shirts and cleats, Under Armour is able to compete with other top athletic wear company’s in their market. If

In today’s athletic market world, being the number one is what many athletes strive for—that is what sets the standards for many sport clothing companies, to deliver products that allow athletes increase their performance while striving to take the number “one” spot. Under Armour works to deliver products that do that and more. Under Armour is currently one of the leading companies in the sports apparel industry whose mission is to “Make all athletes better through passion, design, and the relentless pursuit of innovation” (Under Armour, Inc). Baltimore, Maryland-based Under Armour, founded in 1996 by ex-football player Kevin Plank, who transformed the sports apparel industry by creating apparel that used synthetic materials as an alternative to natural fibers, such as cotton, or other materials, such as polyester. Plank’s mission was to develop a shirt using synthetic materials that handled perspiration most efficiently than was previously expected. Under Armour’s ability to target their products to a wide range of potential clients has enhanced their ability to continue to grow within the athletic marketplace. Under Armour, it is classified as a high-end fitness clothing supplier that appeals to a diverse income audience. This audience has been reached by the outstanding advertising strategies and that include men, women and children. Under Armour currently uses a mixture of pull marketing and different campaigns for its diverse product lines. The overall goal for Under

From the beginning, Under Armour has been a very innovative company. CEO, Kevin Plank innovated the way athletic apparel was made. They also still display passion through one of their core competencies, listed in Exhibit 3, which is to bring as much value as possible to their customers. Another one of Under Armour’s weaknesses according to Exhibit 2 is the lack of their international business. When you compare Under Armour to Nike it is easy to see how big of a difference there is between their geographical exposures. While the majority of Nike’s revenue comes from North America, they also have business segments all over Europe, China, Japan and some emerging markets as well. Adidas is modeled the same way. As mentioned briefly earlier, they have large segments of their revenue coming from regions around the world such as Europe, China, Asia and Latin America. When you compare this to the fact that roughly 94% of Under Armour’s net revenues over the past several years has come from North America, it is easy to see why they need to focus on expanding their international business segments in order to keep competing in this industry (Under Armour 10K). Under Armour’s competitors are working to further

Although the primary reason for sports and athletic wear was initially intended for athletes, many individuals whom do not pursue sports such as students, stay at home mothers, senior citizens, among many others, wear athletic wear daily and do not participate in sports or athletic activities. In conclusion, Under Armors mission statement is short, sweet, simple and to the point. Under Armor’s top competitors consist of a strong mix of new as well as established companies expanding into performance products such as footwear, apparel, work-out wear and sports accessories. Under Armor also competes against sporting goods stores such as Academy, Dicks and Cabela’s. In addition, it competes with companies that specialize in outdoor apparel such as Nike, Adidas, Columbia Sportswear and The

As shown in Figure 2 of the Appendix, a Porter Five Force Analysis makes it clear that the overall rivalry within the athletic apparel industry is medium to high. Because Nike and Adidas already have a substantial amount of capital resources and other assets, Under Armour struggles against them to gain market share. 8Also, private labels of retailers and newer sports apparel companies could potentially pose a threat to Under Armour, but mostly due to the fact that Under Armour does not hold any fabric or process patents. This makes it extremely easy for any competitor to duplicate a product or process with no consequence. However, the threat of new entrants is not too troublesome within the industry because of the great capital cost required for branding, advertising, and meeting product demand. Furthermore, the sports apparel industry is in the maturity phase of the industry life cycle. This means that each company included in the oligopoly must

Under Armour adopt a differentiate product strategy through striving to offer superior products in its lineup of offerings to foster an innovation culture for the company. Moreover, it also worked with high-tech companies to produce innovative products such as Connected Fitness to step into a newer market segment.

Under Armour provides sports clothing, casual apparel and footwear. It faces intense competition from Nike, Adidas, and Puma.

The athletic industry is a demanding market where brands battle for consumer’s attention and try to hold on to them through brand loyalty. To compete with one another, companies have to come out with new trends regularly. Nike is a leading competitor in the market and has been for the last fifty years. However, Under Armour, an up and coming competitor is challenging Nike through new styles and lower prices. These two companies look fairly similar; however, Under Armour’s strategy is different and it should be putting Nike on edge.

The major weakness that has been identified is the lack of Under Armour’s lack of establishment and footprint of the brand around the world. Over 90% of the company's revenue comes from the North American market, which is a major source of concern. They are starting to become a larger brand in the golfing world which will help them gain market share in the western world but still doesn’t help with eastern Europe, Asia, and Africa. They can change this by sponsoring and equipping more soccer and cricket athletes and teams. These are some of the two largest sports in the world and if they are able to get their brand associated with these sports Under Armor will easily become a household