preview

Cal/G Caloric Content

Satisfactory Essays

1. The caloric content values that we determined experimentally is lower to the labels of the nuts. For example, for the almonds, the experimental caloric content (Cal/g) is 0.006 Cal/g, trial 1, and 0.009 Cal/g, trial 2, which is lower to the label for almonds which is 6 Cal/g. For the cashew, the experimental (Cal/g) is 0.003 Cal/g, trial 1, and 0.005 Cal/g, trial 2, which is lower than the labeled Calories per gram, 5.75 Cal/g. The reason why it is different is because of the heat loss. If there was not heat loss than the Cal/g for each nuts would be closer to the labeled product. 2. Heat was lost on the can because heat was transferring to the bottom of the can. In addition, the surroundings that the nut was burning. For example, the air of the room. Lastly, since the heat was not isolated, heat would be lost because of the heat being able to get out of the area. 3. …show more content…

Both the can and the beaker, with an almond, the results are in between the values of 9-5. For example, the heat released by sample (cal) for the can was 9.054 cal and 5.628 cal; for the beaker it is 6.489 cal and 5.796 cal. Trial 2 is similar to each other compared to Trial 1; however, Trial 1 is higher than Trial 2. In addition, the beaker has the same experimental caloric content (calories per gram) for trial 1 and 2, but not for the can. For example, the experimental caloric content for the beaker are both 7 cal/g and for the can it is 9 cal/g and 6 cal/g. The nut substitute, goldfish crackers, has lower values compared to the almonds and cashews. For example, the experimental Cal/g for the goldfish crackers were both 0.001 Cal/g while for the almonds it is 0.009 Cal/g and 0.006 Cal/g and for the cashews it is 0.003 Cal/g and 0.005

Get Access