Can Videogames Be A Work Of Art?

In the Article “Why Video Games Are Works Of Art” Kyle Chayka states his views on Roger Ebert’s argument made in the article “Video Games can never be art.” In Eberts article he says that video games are something that can be won, and include rules and objectives, where art is a visually pleasing, and emotionally powerful experience. As a result in Ebert saying this, Chayka comes back and states many of the things he has experienced in video games. For example, he states “I’ve stood at the top of a grass-blown knoll overlooking the sea, a view that stretched to cover a land of sprawling islands traversed only by my sailboat and me. I have played a musical instrument that controls the wind. I’ve been a sword-wielding teenage adventurer, a ghostbuster,

by Alexandra Coates, the authors express their differing beliefs about whether video gaming should be considered a sport or not. Coates believes that video gaming is unlike any other sport and discourages social interactions, while Mullenioux feels that many video games involve being in teams and share similar skills as traditional sports. In their respective articles, both authors write about their opposing views on how video gaming compares to sports. In the text, "Is Video Gaming a Sport?" No.

Many video games use visuals to mentally immerse gamers into a virtual world filled with seemingly living, breathing people, animals, or cities. According to Michael Samyn and Auriea Harvey, game designers for Tale of Tales, video games increasingly develop into a true medium of artistic expression (Lamb). In just forty years, video games transformed from an abuse of the new computer for entertainment purposes into a sophisticated form of popular art. The development of video games recently produced results that arguably equal other similar, representational arts. Video games share many qualities with other forms of art, but they are also artistically significant in their own way. “This seems to be something

The video game world is full of wonders, fantasy worlds, and even real life scenarios that we see on television. There are games based off of television shows, popular movies, and even comic book universes. In David Perry’s speech and presentation, “Are Video Games Better Than Life?” he brought up a lot of points about gaming both from its humble beginnings to where we are today. However, he made it clear that the discussion was to be about the video game world. Are video games better than reality? This is a hard question with various and diverse answers. It is something that people from just about all walks of life have an opinion about. Through the use of a media presentation, he showed the diverse evolution of games; how since

Aaron Smutz, a philosophy professor at Rhode Island College, in his rhetorical essay “Are Video Games Art?” asserts that video games are indeed art. He first puts forward three critically well-received games to be considered art, then determines what can be used to determine art by considering “sister media” like art and music as well as competition such as chess, football or ice-skating. After establishing an “informal” definition of art, Smutz comes to conclude that since the games he provided cover several facets of game-types and since those games can reasonably fall into the definitions provided of art, then most video games should be considered art. Smutz forms his essay in order to explore the artistic merit of games. Smutz also writes

In response to the article titled, “Are Video Games Art? No – But Playing Them Can Be,” by author Phil Hartup, he makes the argument that video games are not art, but rather the audience that engages themselves in playing them makes it art. The author uses examples such as Mona Lisa and Michael Bay just to support his claim, and while his claims are interesting,some of the stuff he says can be ridiculous, in my opinion. I, myself, disagree with most of his claims. Video games have a big influence on communities just like art, and not only that, but without graphic ARTISTS, we wouldn’t be able to have these video games that we have today. Video games, in my opinion have so much creativity in them that they should be considered as art.

In an article titled Video Games Can Never be Art, the author, Roger Ebert, a famous film critic and well known journalist, shares his opinion that video games will never have the same status as other great works. To specify, he claims that ”no video gamer now living will survive long enough to experience the medium as an art form,” (Ebert). He then subsequently explains that the definition of art is “the creation of one artist,” (Ebert) meaning that a dance is an art because of the choreographer, and architecture is art because of the architect. (Ebert) Very early in the article Ebert makes his point exceedingly clear, he states that not only does he consider video games as something not worth his time, but that they will never (in this lifetime,) amount to the works of any great artist such as Michelangelo or Picasso. He then furthermore contrasts art mediums, including composing,

disbelief about video games not being considered art. In the article by Nick Gillespie, Are Video

Art is very conceptual and can have many interpretations. However, I believe that if something wasn’t created or displayed for the purpose of presenting an idea or representation, then it is not art. For example, if someone makes a chair to sit in, that doesn’t qualify as art. The chair was made to sit in, not to represent or display an idea. I think film is a perfect example of art because there are so many great films like Citizen Kane and The Stanford Prison Experiment that convey a message about human

Do you consider video games as a sport? Personally, when I think of sports, I think of an activity that includes running, jumping, or using any kind of exercise. Also sports have to be able to have a team that can compete. However, when people say that playing video games is a sport; i would have to say it is not, because you don´t use any kind of physical activity. According to gamers; people who are very committed to their games and who are willing to succeed in them, they think that playing games is a sport,but since you don´t use physical activity, playing games is using as much work as making a beaded necklace. Now if you think about it, there

Video games should be considered a form of art because they take time to create, are protected under the same rights as other art forms, and include many other forms of art.

When trying to define art, humankind runs in to many difficulties. Traditional concepts of art include painting, sculpture, drawing, and photography. Art can also be one

One may assume that playing video games is a waste of time and “rots your brain,” but to me, video games are one of my lifestyles. My dad used to tell stories of the three-year-old me sitting on his lap playing a racing game with him. I would immerse myself in the game and giggle whenever I had won. Video games are an integral part of my childhood and is one of the components that have definitely shaped me into who I am today. Growing up playing all types of games, I always wondered about the process behind the creation of games. I remember being amazed at the moving images and flashy visual effects, wondering about

I recently asked my grandmother, what is art? My grandmother is an artist and has been one for over fifty years, so I thought she was the best choice to give an opinion on the matter. She described art as being an expression of one’s self; that almost anything could be considered art or artistic. She was a sculptor, so I found her opinion to be a little surprising; she wasn’t a new age type artist, but a trained fine artist who has been featured in museums. She told me that many different forms of entertainment were not considered to be art or artistic at first such as film or photography. She says this is common for developing art forms in their formative years, but once they reached the mainstream and are popular enough, they are then considered to be a legitimate art form. She reminded me that different styles of art were at times not considered to be true art. She discussed how the Nazis deemed certain works to be degenerate and not true art. She described how many artists such as Picasso, Van Gogh, and Dali were not considered to be true artists when they first started out, but ended up revolutionizing not only their own style of art, but the art world as a whole. She discussed how one of her first major pieces, Guns, a sculpture made entirely of plastic guns in the shape of a coffin, was lauded by critics for its political and social commentary, but never considered to be true art due to its style and material. My grandmother is right in her assessment that art is an

“The reason why people find it so enjoyable is that games are usually the right degree of challenging and the player takes an active role (unlike watching television) so there is an incentive to achieve” (Gee). Ever since video games were invented there was an immediate attachment and an unwillingness to release them. They present chances to accomplish things one may not be able to do in their life, and provides an escape from reality. Video games also imprint and teach new skills to the gamers who play repeatedly; these skills are very useful in later life and can be applied to nearly every situation in life. However, there are those who have differing opinions and, unfortunately, society and media have constantly berated video games, always painting them in a negative light, brainwashing people to believe that video gaming only harms them...this is incorrect, as video games are neither good nor bad and possess positives and negatives to them.