preview

Case Study: Verizon Legal Compliance

Satisfactory Essays

the subpoena was sent to Verizon Legal Compliance by Michael Trudeau on October 31, 2011. The subpoena specifically requested: “subscriber and billing listings and all calls derived from a special computer run regarding incoming and outgoing calls, and subscriber and billing listings made to and from telephone numbers (508) 939-9183 and (508) 693-9286 from October 17, 2011 to October 19, 2011.”
Verizon Legal Compliance responded to the administrative subpoena with a ten-page fax on November 17, 2011. [Attachment #4] The contents of the fax included a cover sheet, a blank page, five pages of phone records, and a fax confirmation sheet; it is unknown what pages nine and ten included, as it was not provided to bar counsel. It is possible that pages nine and ten were copies of the original faxed subpoena. The records provided only appear to be a list of phone numbers and do not indicate which subpoenaed number they correlate with, when a call was made, and if a call was made or received. Laura Marshard’s home number, Gabe Grasing’s home number, and Mary Grasing’s home phone number all appear on the list. …show more content…

In addition to specific phone numbers, all subpoenas included language requesting that the carrier search for any phone lines associated with Laura Marshard, Gabe Grasing, and Mary Grasing. [Attachment #5] Per bar counsel’s subpoena to Verizon landline, bar counsel learned that Gabe Grasing’s home landline was owned by Comcast from 10.1.11 through 11.6.11, therefore it is reasonable to the conclude that the records the DA’s Office sent an administrative subpoena for only pertain to Mary Grasing. The significance of this will be discussed further later in this

Get Access