1. Several factors have made Interco an attractive takeover target: 1) Interco’s stock is undervalued due to poor performance in the apparel and general merchandising divisions, which have weakened Interco’s valuation as a whole. 2) As stated by the equity analysts, Interco is an over capitalized company with potential to grow, which makes an acquisition easy to finance. 3) Interco is also a cash generative target for a potential acquirer as it generates approximately $0.10 of operating cash flow for every dollar of sales. 4) The company is also structured in a way that it could be broken up and sold into its constituent parts, which could prove to be worth more than the whole.
2. As a member of the Board of Interco, neither the
…show more content…
o The projected operating margin of 6.4% is much higher than the recently declining trend of 7.3%, 5.5% and 2.5% for the last 3 years, respectively.
• Footwear division’s projected growth rate of 6.3% is significantly lower than the recent performance of 19% and 34% over the last two years respectively. Also, it is projected to be the lowest of the four divisions despite being the best performer recently.
• Terminal value multiples of 14x-16x seem high. The Board should ask for additional support to validate these assumptions
• Discount rate of 10-13%. 10% seems low given the corporate bond rates and the risk free rates given in Exhibit 14. We should also perform a Weighted Average Cost of Capital calculation based on the desired equity return of the investors and the potential Debt/Equity ratio. A preliminary estimate assuming a 60%/40% D/E ratio, a required equity return of 20%, a required debt return of 10% and a 41% tax rate would require a minimum discount rate of 11.5%.
4. Given the information provided, $70 seems like a reasonable offer worthy of consideration. The $70 offer is in range based of the Wasserstein analysis and Rales has indicated its willingness to increase the bid if supported by further due diligence. There is no reason to believe that Interco could potentially get a higher bid given that no other suitors exist and also given the recent performance of the stock prior to the news of the initial takeover offer.
The main source of cash is A/R. In 1991 the company also gathered $23M issuing stock.
Our estimated cost of capital, 20.81%, is lower than Ricketts’ expected return, 30%-50%, thus the investment is worthy. However, it’s higher than other pessimistic members’ expected return, 10%-15%, making the decision more complex and requiring further valuation。
Assess the degree to which the firm’s accounting reflects the underlying business reality. Identify accounting distortions and evaluate their impact on profits and the sustainability of profits.
The accounting system we use today started in Venice in renaissance period over 520 years ago. The trade business increased hugely during this time and all the financial recordings had to be written down to help people see how their business is doing. During that time in 1494 the first book about was published in accounting by Luca Paciolli and was called “The Collected Knowledge of Arithmetic, Geometry, Proportion and Proportionality”. He was called “The father of Accounting” and most of his described principles have been used up until this day.
Operating profit has progressively fallen throughout the years at FCUK from 33.6 million in 2005 then dropped over half in 2006 to 11.2million then again to 3.3million in 2007 and to 1.4million in 2008 and in 2009 began to make a loss of -6.9million.this could be due to difficult retail environments in all of the markets around the world despite the reduction in head office staffing and the closure of their northern European retail operations.
Formerly a footwear manufacturing company, Interco developed into a diversified company that comprised subsidiary corporations in four major business areas: apparel manufacturing, general retail merchandising, footwear manufacturing and retailing, and furniture and home furnishings. Due to the fact that Interco 's subsidiaries operated as autonomous units and lacked integration between its operating divisions, the company is particularly vulnerable to a highly leveraged takeover, as far as the management concerned.
WPC has used a discount rate of 15% to evaluate potential projects for the last 10 years. Many in management are correct in thinking that this rate should be evaluated on a much more frequent basis. The current rate of 15% is much too high considering the yield on treasury bonds has declined from 10% to 5% over the last ten years. In order to calculate the correct discount rate we must first determine what their equity and debt ratios are. As you can see in Exhibit1, in order to find the total value of equity we must multiply the number of total outstanding shares of stock times the market value of each share. Completing this calculation shows us that WPC has $12 billion in outstanding equity. WPC also has $2.5 billion in outstanding debt. If you add the debt and equity together we see that WPC has a total of $14.2 billion in outstanding financing. Assuming the 10 year rate of Government Bonds of 4.60% as our risk free rate and using the Capital Asset Pricing Model we find that that WPC’s return on equity is 11.2% (See Exhibit 1). As stated in the case, Worldwide Paper Company has an A bond rating so we can use the 5.78% for their return on debt. Combining all of these variables in the Weighted Average Cost of
Why is the company a target of a hostile takeover attempt? The market price of Interco’s stock took a dive in the market crash in October 1987. The market condition and market participants’ perception could have depressed the stock price making the company vulnerable for takeover. In addition, Interco’s repurchasing strategy reduced outstanding shares making it easier to achieve more voting rights. Interco had shown overall consistent growth and history of recurring cash flows, despite the two underperforming groups not contributing to overall profitability. The strong financials of the company, even with the two underperforming units, sends a signal to the market that Interco could be undervalued. Thus, making Interco a viable target for a takeover and restructuring workout. Acquirer could see opportunities to improve financial performance by replacing current management and thereby eliminating agency cost, lack of operational monitoring and empire building, caused by managers also being board members. Perception could be that a break-up value of Interco is higher than the company value in current state. Higher value would be achieved through disposal of selected units as they could be worth more to a strategic acquirer, achieving synergies. In result the acquirer could focus on more profitable units which would yield higher profit margins. Interco’s conservative capital structure, low debt and high equity, could attract hostile acquirers taking
Operating profit margin figures in the table above show the return from net sales[13]. However profit margin ratios are high enough for the 3 years, there is a fall from 12.86% to 11.26% during 2011-12. Sales revenue increases with a higher rate than gross profit so there is a poor
class he had missed had been devoted to a lecture and discussion of the statement of cash flows, and
Trade debts mean that money can often be tied up for as much as sic
One of the issues will be the integration of the two companies seeing as they are operating in two dissimilar segments within the same industry. Our Chief Operating Officer is quite concerned that the synergy of the two company’s operations and cultures won’t be realized and believes that the acquisition will result in an expensive experiment that will undermine shareholder value. I share his concerns and feel that this issue must be addressed if the integration of our two companies is to be successful.
Within respects to cash flow after operations generally refers to the cash the company has in accounts receivable which thereafter, goes in the overall operations of a company. In regards to Procter and Gamble, the cash flow for ending June, 2016 is 15,435,000 and with the year prior 14,608,000. Procter and Gamble EBITDA, refers to earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization in which Procter and Gamble recorded 17,026 billion with a ratio of 14.00% Finally, Contribution Margin, refers to determine the rate of return of otherwise known as profit. Thereafter, if a certain area of an operation is lacking or losing money the powers that be can then go and concentrate on that particular area and assist with strengthening this area and turn things around to earn a profit.(Figure 2).
The management of cash is essential to the survival of any organization. Managing an organization’s financial operation requires knowledge of the economy and ways to maximize revenue. For any organization to operate on a daily basis adequate cash flow is required. Without cash management the organization will be unable to function because there is no cash readily available in case of inconsistencies in the market. Cash is also needed to keep the cycle of the company’s operations going.
Cash is king when it comes to managing the financials for a small business. Managing cash can easily make or break a company in the early stages of the business cycle. Cash flow refers to the amounts of money moving in and out of the business. When an entrepreneur starts his business, one way or another capital must be raised in order to fund the daily operations of the business. The business can either have a positive cash flow where the company brings in more money than it spends (which is a sign of god financial strength for a company), or it can have a negative cash flow that is caused by spending more money than what is taken in (the largest cause of business failure) (Reuters 2016).