preview

Causes And Consequences Of B. F Skinner

Decent Essays

Burrhus Frederick Skinner, more commonly known as B.F Skinner, believed studying the mind, the internal mental events, was never productive since the mind acted like a black box. For him, more productive approach was seeing a direct behavior. He thought the best way to understand a behavior was to look at the causes of an action and its consequences—operant conditioning. Operant conditioning dealt with operants like internal actions that could have effect on surrounding environment. He then set out to identify the process that made certain operant behaviors more or less likely to occur. Skinner is regarded as father of Operant Conditioning, but his work was based on Thorndike’s Law Of Effect. However, Skinner added new term into the
Law of Effect—reinforcement. This was …show more content…

However, if we look at criminals and see if they are either born or made, psychopaths and sociopaths have different personalities.
Psychopaths would be born criminals where their genetics have relations to their actions where they could hide their feelings and pretend to care, but in reality, they do not. Sociopaths, in contrast, are either made by their surroundings and parental influence. Therefore, if Skinner had done the same experiment on human, who have more capabilities to think than animals, people could have gone to the food straight. They could have yelled or called for help for food. They could have shown more aggressive behaviors than animals and could have simply asked what to do to people who were conducting the experiments. And if people who got experimented repeated their actions over and over again for being right and getting what they wanted, their
Yi
3 greed could also grow. To be honest, Skinner’s theory does not seem too new since that is what people generally believe. For example, if I do my homework and get $5, I would continue

Get Access