Juvenile Justice
There are plenty of articles out there that are talking about charging juveniles, as adults. Some say and augrue that charging, trying, and also converting these young kids as adults has multiple negative consequences. One of the main points said that “it is costly, more than $31,000, on average, to incarcerate an adult for a year.” That is a lot of money to be using but, is it probably going to be less money in the long run. Then if you didn’t charge them now, and then they keep being ruthless acts of crime. One of the other articles, that I read said that children should not be charged as adult when they are just children “except for extreme circumstances.” That's because the children brain is not fully developed yet, and it will not be fully developed until their mid twenties.
In the other article that stated that some juveniles deserve adult charges. They said it because “some juveniles commit crimes so serious, so heinous, and that it makes them fully accountable in the justice crime system.” Which I agree with because, all
…show more content…
In, most cases I would be against charging, trying, and convicting children as adults, because in the long run they are just children, and it's true that children don’t have the best decision making skills that an adult would have. The reason why the don't have those good decision making skills is because their brain is not fully developed. They only time, I would be able to see it being fine to charge children as adults would be in the more extreme cases, when the commit the more extreme acts, like murder, because to me even if you are a little kid, you could have the brain to be able to know its not right to commit something that violent, even if they don't have those good decision making skills. I just feel like they would and should be able to know that. So, in the long run it depends on what the committed and how extreme it
Whether or not we should try juveniles as adults has always been a controversial issue. First of all, “juveniles” are children who fall under the age of 18. However, the legal age varies within certain states across the USA. Despite the age difference, some juveniles are still tried as adults. Does convicting a juvenile as an adult, turn out to be a better problem-solver, and how is this affecting the deterrence of crime?
No matter their age, when it comes to serious offenses juveniles should be tried as adults because the understanding of what is right and wrong is known by young children, if they have the ability to commit a crime they should be charged as adults, and without them being trying
There are times juveniles should not be convicted as adults because sometimes the “crimes” may not harsh enough to be charged as an adult. For example, if a 8 year old saw a gun in their mother's purse and thought it was a toy and grabbed it and began to shoot who would be at fault ? Plus children in adult prisons are 10 times more likely to be taken advantage of in their time. Research shows that children prosecuted in the adult criminal justice system are more likely to reoffend than those held in the juvenile justice
How would you feel if the police arrested kids all over our country to jail for just crossing the street the wrong way or pushing another kid on the playground? That is what is happening to many underage juvenile all over the United States; they are being sent to adult prisons for crimes that do not deserve such severe punishments. Why they were tried as adults is an enigma and we will explain why this is a terrible injustice. In 1899 children in between the ages of 7-14 were believed they were incapable of committing criminal intent. The court system back then believed that if enough evidence could be gathered to convince a jury, the underage person would be convicted and sent to an adult prison. Currently in our state, persons as
In the film 15 to Life: Kenneth’s Story by Nadine Pequeneza the account of Kenneth Young appealing his sentence of four life terms without the possibility of parole is detailed. Young was only 15 years-old when he was charged as an adult for armed robbery and sentenced to life behind bars. Why is it okay for the justice system to charge adolescents as adults? As a nation we can’t logically expect children to be held to the same standards as adults and do so only when criminal courts deem it fit. Charging children as adults for any crime is not only a far cry from being a deterrent but it is also fails to provide justice for all of the individuals involved.
Children should be charged with the same sentence as adults, even though they are young they still commented a serious crime to point where they must be punished for it in a proper way,not in a lesser punish due to age.
Sending juveniles to jail not only hurts the juveniles themselves but it also hurts the American economy. In the article, “Children in adult jails; Juvenile Justice” by The Economist statistical data is displayed to show the affects of being tried as adults have on juveniles and the economy. Some may ponder and think how sending juveniles to prison would hurt the economy. According to the article, “It is costly: more than $31,000, on average, to incarcerate an adult for a year” (The Economist). Juveniles who are tried as adults and sent to prison fall under that price tag. It is incredible to think the federal government would spend $31,000
Kids should not be tried as adults because of the skyrocketing cost it takes to imprison these adolescents. In “The Costs of Confinement: Why Good Juvenile Justice Policies Make Good Fiscal Sense” by the
Juveniles committing crimes is not a new issued being introduced to society; actually, it has been an issue for centuries. However, the big question is, should juveniles be tried in adult courts? Before answering, take into consideration every possible scenario that could have led them to commit the crime. For instance, were they the leader in the act? Did they participate in the crime? Was the juvenile even aware of what was taking place? Were they peer pressured? Did they have any other choice at the time? There are so many other questions we could consider when making a decision here.
If we don’t try juveniles in adult court for serious crimes what should the alternative be? This question has been around for a long time and we still don’t have the answer for it. Juveniles commit crimes on the daily but some plan their crimes and some just do it knowing that what they’re doing is wrong. Having a young child from about five to eight commit a crime is difficult to decide if we should try the child as an adult or a juvenile. Children that are young may still have a chance that's why they get tried as juveniles. Some of the juveniles get sent to rehabilitation centers to hopefully get better.
Should Juveniles be Tried as Adults? Violent crimes are committed in the United States everyday. Almost one-half of them are committed by teenagers ages 13 through 17 ("End of Line" 484). After the crimes have been committed and the lives of these children have been radically changed, society often demands that those who commit violent crimes be tried as adults, rather than as adolescents. Juveniles should be given light sentences and a second chance to return to the streets. Trying these teens as adults unjust and unfair, there other alternatives that our society can turn to, to help make our communities better places to live. We need to realize that children are our future, and we
In view of people who are not against juveniles being tried as adults, if a person is aware of what they’re doing and has control of what they’re doing then they should be punished. If a minor has the guts to make the same mistake as an adult and break the law then they should have the responsibility to face what they did. Juveniles should be tried as adults, based on the crime that is committed. If the crime is severe as murder or rape, then yes, an adult charge should be served. They should be charged as juveniles and seek for help.
Juveniles can be tried as adults for crimes ranging from kidnapping, murder, rape, arson, robbery, torture, assault, and more. Some of the cases that are sent to adult court are petty crimes, such as: underage drinking, possession of a controlled substance, and other minor crimes. The question is whether they should be tried as adults. These are all adult actions, on one hand, and may lead a person to wonder what brought a child to commit these crimes. One might further inspect that if a child or teenager is engaged in so-called “adult” activities, what kind of activities might a child choose to be involved in adulthood? What is the child’s background? Can you blame the child of a heroin addict for having access to drugs at a young age? Can you blame the child of a murderer for acting out? Yes, everyone has a choice even a child.
Imagine sitting in a courtroom, hoping the the judge will not give a harsh sentence. Unfortunately, that’s the case for many juveniles, some as young as 13! A juvenile is subject to a more severe sentence with the limited sentencing available. It is estimated that 250,000 youth are prosecuted as adults, each year. This number should change, as juveniles are not adults, both mentally and physically. Juveniles need an environment surrounded with guiding adults, education and the resources to help them. A juvenile is not an adult, and should not be tried as one.
In my own opinion, I consider juveniles as immature because they lack the ability to recognize the long term impact of their actions as they have decreased levels of responsibility. Therefore, the justice system should not charge juveniles in adult legal system and sentence them as adults.Trying juveniles as adults exposes the young offenders to state penitentiaries up to life in prison without parole and even sentenced to death. This raises a question on how truly effective treating juveniles as adults are to the young offenders. As the crimes committed by juveniles increase, there has been an outcry from the public and affected to prosecute juveniles accused of serious crimes as adults. It is true that juveniles do