From the colonial era in America to present day, there has always been black resistance whether it’s just by revolting by not doing work or armed self-defense.
Cobb illustrates that armed self-defense as a form of black resistance. Cobb talks about a personal experience of his in which he refers to how the Mayor of Ruleville, Mississippi actually held Cobb and two of his friends at gunpoint, barking, “You African-Americans get into the car!” (23). And when asked why, Dorrough yelled, “Because this pistol says to!” (23). This part of the book shows that even though that his friends and Cobb were just being non-violent, they almost got killed by the Ruleville’s mayor.
Cobb shows that one of the earliest restrictions placed upon peoples of African descent came in the form of laws that made it illegal for any black person, free or enslaved, to own a gun. And he reminds us that fears of slave insurrections remained a constant feature of slavery. Cobb considers the Civil War a “watershed” moment because it provided African American soldiers with the opportunity to fight courageously and use guns to wound and kill
…show more content…
Army after the end of World War II. Their dissatisfaction with the treatment of blacks in the South led to major acts of resistance, such as attempting registering to vote, and these actions eventually “led Amize Moore, Medgar Evers, and other World War II veterans to become civil rights leaders in the decades following the war” (91). This portion of the book leads back to Cobb’s arguments on violence during the movement because the chapter shows how Evers’ story led numerous WWII veterans to become leaders in the CRM and even “show their defiance – such as James Stephenson and Jackie Robinson did -- on a personal level, instead of organized political actions or events”
Ira Berlin (author of many thousands gone) starts this book off (in the prologue) by recalling a dispute some years ago over “who freed the slaves?” in the Civil War South. He was interviewed on Washington's public radio station about the meaning of “The Emancipation Proclamation”. He also addressed other familiar themes of the great document origin’s nature of the Civil War changing, the growing Black labor and the union's army’s dependence on it, the Evermore intensifying opposition to slavery in the North, and the interaction of military necessity an abolitionist idealism. He rehearsed the long established debate over the role of Abraham Lincoln, the radicals in Congress, abolitionists in the North, the Union army in the field, and slaves on the slaves on the plantations of the South in the destruction of slavery and in the authorship of legal freedom. During this debate he restated his position that “slaves played a critical role in securing their own freedom”.
This paper will firstly look at the process that lead to the recruitment of African-Americans into the Union Army, by analyzing Lincoln’s attitude towards slavery. It will go on to assess the importance of the changing status of blacks within the army, focusing specifically on the example of Massachusetts. It will also analyze how this was reflected in the differing opinions and prejudices held against black soldiers within the regiments of Massachusetts. It will argue that, as a result of increased sectionalism and the threat of secession Lincoln increasingly had to reassess his own position on certain issues, especially when it came to his ideas about slavery and emancipation. Lincoln’s realization that the war was being fought over the ‘peculiar institution’ and his issuance of the Emancipation Proclamation were another step away from his hopes of keeping the Union together. From this point, although Lincoln implemented it slowly and reluctantly, it was a gradual process moving from emancipation to the admittance of black regiments into the Union Army. Therefore, as the debate over slavery came to a head, and slaves were freed in the North, so questions about the status and place of African-Americans became a reality that had to be dealt with. It will argue that there was much prejudice against
Charles E. Cobb Jr. This Nonviolent Stuff’ll Get You Killed: How Guns Made The Civil Rights Movement Possible. New York: Basic Books, A Member of the Perseus Group. 2014
The Civil War has been one of the most pivotal moments in American history. The was would change the way American functioned, as its main goal was to abolish slavery and promote equality. Yet, although the Civil War’s main goal was to gain rights for African Americans, they were still not allowed to fight for the Union army in 1861. As a response to this, Alfred M. Green (an African American himself) expresses his frustration with this situation by giving a speech to his fellow African Americans. He reveals that he believes that they should work harder to join the Union Army and he does so fervently. By employing the strategies of ethos as well as comparison, Green urges the African American community to join the Union army and fight for their
In his conclusion, McPherson answer what may lead one to ask if the American Civil War was indeed an extraordinary revolution, one whose likes the world had ever seen. The answer lies in the exact opposite of revolution. Counterrevolution occurred at first chance which in so many ways blanketed the revolutionary characteristics to the best of its applicability. From 1865 to 1866, immediately after the war, black codes began to surface. The purpose of these codes were to keep black labor in a state of dependence and subjection as close to slavery as possible. These codes appeared in the forms of vagrancy laws, contract labor laws the subjected freedmen to peonage and sharecropping, and violence. This code also makes for the final piece of evidence toward support of McPherson’s goal in categorizing the American Civil War as a revolution. Southern redeemers, after the withdrawal of northern Republican interest, went through great lengths to counter evolve them. Why would that be? In order to
The Civil War caused a shift in the ways that many Americans thought about slavery and race. Chandra Manning’s What this Cruel War Was Over helps readers understand how soldiers viewed slavery during the Civil War. The book is a narrative, which follows the life of Union soldier who is from Massachusetts. Chandra Manning used letters, diaries and regimental newspapers to gain an understanding of soldiers’ views of slavery. The main character, Charles Brewster has never encountered slaves. However, he believes that Negroes are inferior. He does not meet slaves until he enters the war in the southern states of Maryland and Virginia. Charles Brewster views the slaves first as contraband. He believes the slaves are a burden and should be sent back to their owners because of the fugitive slave laws. Union soldiers focus shifted before the end of the war. They believed slavery was cruel and inhumane, expressing strong desire to liberate the slaves. As the war progresses, soldiers view slaves and slavery in a different light. This paper, by referring to the themes and characters presented in Chandra Manning’s What this Cruel War Was Over, analyzes how the issue of slavery and race shifted in the eyes of white Union soldiers’ during Civil War times.
Since the start of the Civil War at 1816, almost 180 thousands African Americans joined the Union Army to fight for their freedom over a four year period. Especially, the runaway slaves, also known as contrabands, are said to dutifully fight with the Union army for the unity of the nation and racial equality. The general historical facts may erroneously portray the Northerners as enlightened people who are aware of human rights. Nevertheless, the picture called “How to Make the Contrabands Useful,” drawn during the war, clearly illustrates the desperate situation that contrabands had to go through in the unwelcomed Union army. Despite the common belief of the Union soldiers as heroes, the illustration reveals the racial discrimination in the
From 1816, the start of the Civil War, almost 180 thousand African Americans joined the Union Army to fight for their freedom over a four year period. Most of the African American soldiers were the runaway slaves, also known as contrabands, and they dutifully fought with the Union army for the unity of the nation and racial equality. The fact that the Union Army was supported by the black soldiers and promoted the emancipation proclamation may erroneously portray the Northerners as enlightened people who are aware of human rights. Nevertheless, the picture called “How to Make the Contrabands Useful,” drawn during the war, clearly illustrates the desperate situation that contrabands had to go through in the unwelcomed Union Army. Despite the
Every man, woman, and child that is born unto this earth is given one thing; free will. Or at least in theory. That is not to say that in every society, there are consequences for actions or that everyone is to be allowed to run rampant doing what they want. But most restrictions today, at least legally, are enforced so as to not infringe on someone else’s right to freedom. In Celia, a Slave, Melton A. McLaurin’s interpretation of events that happened to a young unfortunate slave in the antebellum period, we are shown a glimpse at the frustratingly futile effort fought to give a slave women the right to self-defense against someone who encroached on something that everyone should have the right to have. Melton has written many books that gives insight of life in the south, such as The Knights of Labor in the South, and Separate Pasts: Growing Up White in the Segregated South. His take on this historic trial gives such an honest insight that someone from anywhere else but the south, could not have given.
African-Americans have fought on many of liberty’s battlefields from the pre-emancipated plantation to the killing fields of the Civil War. African-Americans have always been willing to fight not just for their freedom, but for their country as well. Yet, their country never lived up to its founding document that asserts that, “All men are created equal; ”instead,
Most literature about the American Civil War will discuss the intricacies of battle strategy in great detail. These accounts may also painstakingly discuss the rationale of the presidents, the generals, and even some of the soldiers involved in perhaps the greatest American conflict, divulging further and further into how the war began, what could have been done to prevent it, and whether or not the Civil War was in fact about slavery. However, there is very limited literature on the people directly at the center of this conflict: the enslaved. Tennessee Civil War 150, a documentary series produced by Nashville Public Television, included a thirty-minute segment discussing this very subject. “Looking Over Jordan” from Tennessee Civil War 150 not only includes African Americans in the discussion regarding the social
Americans primarily know the Civil War today as a war between northern states and southern states. The war began because each side perceived its liberty to be at risk. However, the fight underlined core differences between the beliefs of the North and South. “I could easily prove that almost all the differences which may be noticed between characters of the Americans in the Southern and in the Northern states have originated in slavery”, said Alexis De Tocqueville while visiting the United States in the 1800’s (Keene, p. 270). What began as a fight for liberty soon became a fight over the institution of slavery. Both sides had different interpretations of enslavement and the moral questions involved with the topic. The book What They Fought For addresses these questions in profound detail using letters from members of both the Union and Confederate army.
Beginning in 1861, the civil war was fought over many political questions regarding slavery, yet was barely focused on the actual freedom of the slaves themselves. It is often taught that the Union fought for the freedom of slaves at the beginning of the war. However, it is more accurate to say that Abraham Lincoln’s primary goal at the beginning of the war was to reunite the Union after the majority of the slave-owning states seceded to protect their way of life: slavery. Yet, by the end of the war, the Union’s goal was to free the slaves. Though the laws securing slaves freedom and suffrage were contributed to by many, the primary driving forces behind them was the African Americans. Through their willingness to fight and support the Union cause, African Americans made the United States acknowledge their struggles and transformed the war into a fight for reconnection and freedom. Though hindered by racist people and policies, the African Americans’ participation during the war and Reconstruction greatly contributed to tremendous cultural change as well as the securing of legal rights to blacks.
Black people in the U.S have been fighting for themselves since the birth of America. Many today say that it will never stop. They may say that the challenges they face will never disappear. During the 1800s Blacks went through extreme hardships. Most of which were regarding slavery and the many attempts to put an end to it. The title of Howard Zinn’s Chapter Nine in A people’s History of the U.S represents much more than a typical reader would presume. The title has a meaning that represents a bulk of black history in the United States of America. The chapter title “Slavery Without Submission, Emancipation Without Freedom” represents the everlasting fight that black people in the United States of America have had to put up for their own rights and freedom because blacks fought during the time of slavery and didn’t give up, the time period spent fighting to end slavery, and even after Slaves were freed they have had to continue fighting for the reason that they weren’t given true freedom.
The American Civil War was the deadliest warfare in American history soil; leaving approximately 620 thousand dead and over 300 thousand wounded. One would ask, who or what was the massive roles that played? During the nineteenth century, as the newborn nation, United States used racial identity, such as slaves or free blacks, and firearms were involved in the Civil War. I believe through this research paper, my learning from my K-12 schooling has not change significantly.