Civil and Social Disobedience Essay

Civil Disobedience: The Tools of Progress Since the beginning of days, peaceful protests have pushed the world along. Many people view civil disobedience as a violent action that hardly ever succeeds. However, true civil disobedience, the peaceful protestation of laws, is extremely helpful to society. When those who are oppressed show discontent without violence it is easier for the oppressor to see the other side. Truly peaceful protests achieve change while violent ones only serve as an excuse to dismiss a cause as dangerous or unprofessional.

Published in the year 1776, common sense is an open challenge to the British government and the royal monarchy of that time. Paine spoke the language of a common person and worked for the independence of Great Britain. Paine states his opinion by arguing at the American Independence beginning with the theoretical and general reflections about religion and government and move on to the specifications about the situation in the colonies. By doing so, he aims to persuade the people to become more patriotic and join the fight against the British to become an independent nation. At the same time, Thoreau was one of the exciting practitioners of writing and was an intuitive genius. He worked hard to revise as well as refined his material.

When our founding fathers signed the Declaration of Independence in 1776, they set out to create a Democratic nation where everyone would be able to voice his or her own opinions and push for favorable reforms. This radical idea was challenged by the mightiest army in the world over a series of two wars, but prevailed through endless sacrifice by our nation's earliest patriots. Since, the freedom of speech has morphed into a central pillar for Democracy. Without it, most of the population would not be able to vote, gay rights would not exist, and the American Dream would never be fulfilled. By voicing the common people’s ideas, keeping governments honest in their service, and remaining peaceful, civil disobedience has and can continue to bring forth revolutionary change quintessential to our evolution. If not for civil

In 1968, Martin Luther King Jr passed away from a sniper’s bullet. He gave us thirteen years of nonviolent protest during the civil rights movement of the 1950’s. Before I can give my opinion on the history of race relations in the United States since King’s assassination in 1968 strengthened or weakened his arguments on the necessity and value of civil disobedience? You should know the meaning of civil disobedience. The word civil has several definitions. “The one that is intended in this case is "relating to citizens and their interrelations with one another or with the state", and so civil disobedience means "disobedience to the state". Sometimes people assume that civil in this case means "observing accepted social forms; polite" which

America is a nation built on disobedience. We disobeyed British laws over and over, the Proclamation of 1763, the Stamp Act, the Boston Tea Party, leading up to a full blown revolution. Throughout our history as a nation, we have long employed similar acts of disobedience to promote social change, such as Henry David Thoreau in the 1840s and 50s and Martin Luther King Jr during the Civil Rights Movement. However, recently, a debate has risen up over whether the benefits of civil disobedience outweigh the liabilities. I argue that, when all legal options have been exhausted in trying to resolve an issue, than peaceful resistance towards laws, i.e. breaking them without using violence, becomes a viable option to positively reform society so long

When should civil disobedience be condoned? Should it be condoned? Civil disobedience is defined as the refusal to obey government laws, in an effort to bring upon a change in governmental policy or legislation. Civil disobedience is not an effort to dissolve the American government, because without government our society would result in chaos. Sometimes, when there is an unjust law and the government won't take the initiative to fix it, the public must act as civil disobedients to bring awareness and fix the unjust law. An unjust law is that which is not moral and does not respect the "god-given" rights which are entitled to every person. A law which allows freedom for some but not for others, on the basis of sex, sexual

Civil disobedience is the act of opposing a law one considers unjust and peacefully disobeying it while accepting the consequences. Peaceful resistance to laws positively or negatively impact a free society because for example we're going to take it back to segeration. Negroes must earn the respect of the white people. But how can the Negroes win the respect of the whites when they are being cowards? They must stand up for their rights and must not accept that they dont have freedom to become citizens of the United States of America.

In 21st century United States, the American society has continue to push the idea of social acceptance. From the mid-1900s to now, anti-racist and and anti-sexist agendas (among other things) have advocated for equal rights and representation through protesting. But now, with their ability to make an equal impact on American society, I am led to conclude that civil disobedience in the form of protesting is unacceptable due to the basic principles of the social contract and legislative representation.

American thinking has always been different as, we believe, “We are a nation that has a government - not the other way around. And this makes us special among the nations of the earth” (Ronald Reagan) the core of our country was built on the idea that the people control their own destiny. Civil disobedience is the way American’s have shown their unrest, it is the way America continues to be a beacon of hope and freedom. Resisting laws that

Land, water, sky. These are the seemingly immutable components of the Earth that we all feel are our birthright. Now place yourself in the position of the native American people, land removed from their ancestral use and many times themselves being removed from the land of their birth and relocated to small land holdings on the poorest, “worthless” land available. Water dammed, rerouted, and apportioned to non-native landholders. Skies filled with pollution from strip mining of those same ancestral lands, or irradiated with atomic waste in the name of “National Security”. These rights of land, water, and sky ratified by treaties which have been repeatedly violated by State and Federal government when the marginal land “given” was

The history of African-Americans has come a long way through the years. They were first imported as slaves as property to do hard labor for their owners. With no freedom, they were forced to obey orders until a revolution appeared. It took a civil war to finally free blacks and to give them the right to be citizens of the country. It was then that the chains of slavery were finally broken, but the chain of discrimination still existed. Under racial segregation, colored people were not allowed to share public facilities and activities with white people. The Civil Rights Movement was then established with its goal to clear any segregation and discrimination against African Americans. In today’s society, discrimination has been banned, but a degree of segregation still exists in our community such as schools. Segregation has not yet ending. The civil disobedience of African-Americans can be examined be looking at its origin, the consequences they had to overcome, and the outcome after their fight to be equal.

Civil disobedience and peaceful protest have been and caused a great impact on this country. The United States of America is something that has been greatly changed by these acts and continues to change due to the act of civil disobedience by the countries citizens. The use of peaceful protest and resistance to a law in a free society is something that impacts it for the better of the nation.

The political concepts of justice and how a society should be governed have dominated literature through out human history. The concept of peacefully resisting laws set by a governing force can be first be depicted in the world of the Ancient Greeks in the works of Sophocles and actions of Socrates. This popular idea has developed over the centuries and is commonly known today as civil disobedience. Due to the works of Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr. civil disobedience is a well-known political action to Americans; first in the application against slavery and second in the application against segregation. Thoreau’s essay “Civil Disobedience” and King’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail” are the leading arguments in defining

Ban animal cruelty! Give aid to the poor! Save the rainforests! Obey the law! As a human race we must strive to fulfill these commands, for they are our moral duties and obligations. Our obligation to morality sometimes leads to a dilemma. What happens when a law contradicts the morally right thing to do? Would it be moral to act illegally by breaking the law? No matter how drastic the measure, we are still required to act morally--even if one must break the law to do so. But why is it so important to be moral that one could justify something as serious as breaking the law?

person is not they will continue to obey because at least this way they feel as if they are a