preview

Classical Rhetoric Vs Persuasion

Decent Essays

Traditional rhetoric is based on persuasion. According to Plato, rhetoric is the “art of enchanting a soul, and Aristotle defines rhetoric as “the faculty of discovering in any particular case all of the available means of persuasion" (Edinmiller 2017). Plato believed rhetoric and persuasion were extremely powerful but was very dangerous if used for personal motives. This led to his disagreements with the Sophists, who practiced rhetoric for a profit. Plato believed that for someone to be a true orator, they must be well trained in the art and have a love of wisdom and justice. For Aristotle, the goal of rhetoric was to see all sides of an argument and use rhetoric to connect with beliefs of the audience. This lead to the creation of the artistic proofs in rhetoric, logos, pathos and ethos (Herrick). Burke referred to classical rhetoric and discourse as old rhetoric. To differentiate from this …show more content…

The speaker also disassociating themselves and the audience from a person or group, creating a division between them and the opposing group (Hitt 2013). A political rally where a politician speaks to a group of people and espouses how they are the candidate that will support their political beliefs and the other candidate will not is an example of creating this division through idealist identification. In creating a division, the speaker may also use a less direct form identification, which is often used by politicians during speeches, the “assumed we” (Quigley 1998). Speakers often use the word “we” in their communication. By using we, the audience assumes the speaker is part of their group and identifies the speaker as such. President Trump used “we” statements extensively through his candidacy, effectively relating to the crowd with statements like We will build a wall and We will make America great

Get Access