Climate policy in Canada is primarily implemented through information, persuasion and voluntary action programs. Canadian policymakers have generally been reluctant to use instruments that put an explicit price on emissions (i.e. tax). This type of attitude towards climate policy stems from the fear of having a negative impact on their overall economic performance and competitiveness of the Canadian industry (Bohringer and Rutherford, 2010). However simply using soft measures such as voluntary programs does not prevent increases of GHG emissions. All in all, the Harper government had been very clear that it had no intention of imposing the types of policies required by the Kyoto Protocol, which officially lead to Canada withdrawing from the agreement.
Climate Change Policies under Harper Government This section will examine the Harper government’s approach to climate change, and later contrast it to the current Trudeau government’s approach. Despite the fact that the current Trudeau government has only been in power for a short amount of time, we can still identify various differences in their approach to tackling the climate change issue. This comparison will essentially demonstrate the fact that a political change in government can sometimes result in a policy issue to be placed on
…show more content…
It has been clear to many that Prime Minister Stephen Harper possessed a hostile perspective towards climate change issues, in contrast to previous Conservative Prime Ministers (i.e. Brian Mulroney). Mulroney made the environment a high priority within his cabinet and on the policy agenda (Healy, 2008). His government developed a first ever Green Plan, and Canada was the first industrialized country to ratify the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC), under which the Kyoto Protocol was developed (Healy,
There has been significant movement to the UK’s climate policy in the last decade. The UK has adopted various policies and instruments to mitigate and adapt to climate change. The recent legislation to tackle climate change in the UK, is successful in itself. This is compared to the international community who have failed to create a fully legally binding document. However climate policy in the UK has not been a resounding success; there is not a wide enough range of active policies and instruments. In addition, the current policies need to remain consistent and extend their applicability to gain success.
Currently, the Canadian government is taking several initiatives to control climate change. In 2017, Canada signed the Paris Accord and agreed to cut 30% of carbon emissions by 2030.
When it comes to the Liberals and Progressive-Conservatives having nearly identical policies by the mid-1980s I cannot help but wonder whether the Liberals enacted these policies based on their own changing ideology or whether it was to try undercut the Progressive-Conservatives' growing popularity. Regardless, it seems apparent that by the early-1980s that the Liberal's government-driven, top-down, style Canadian
The government responsible to take charge for this issue are global, federal and provincial. As a planet, we must coalesce with each other to find solutions to preserving the planet. World leaders are meeting with each other, discussing ways to fix the damages humans created. The government of Canada is dedicated on working with leaders all over the world to make changes that will help resolve the effects of climate change. Also, Canada is committed to supporting and helping out third world countries who need help in accommodating to the effects of climate change. Investments are being made to reduce emissions as well. The government of Canada and its provinces and territories are uniting together to encounter the effects of climate change. They aim on federal funding, the flexibility to design their own carbon pricing policies on putting a price on carbon and reducing carbon pollution.
The reason this question has to be answered is simple, Canada sits at a very important junction in its evolution; does it continue to push forward to become an energy superpower or does it let the environmental conversation win, pushing forward instead with a clean energy agenda? This essay will hopefully drive this conversation forward.
Stewart Elgie, a University of Ottawa law and economics professor and chair of the green economy think-tank Sustainable Prosperity suggests that British Columbia’s per-capita fuel usage had fallen more than 4 per cent compared with the rest of Canada and its economy (Ebner, McCarthy, 2011) Evidently it is reducing the amount of green house gasses emitted by fossil fuel use. However this is not the concern many had with the introduction of the tax, but the concerns were focused upon the externalities caused by this and the effects it would have on the economy. Three years since the carbon tax introduction and the Provincial level of GDP has remained approximately the same, (Greenery in Canada: We have a winner) With the provincial level of GDP remaining around the same, this suggests that at the very worst the carbon tax has had no negative effects to the provincial economy. Furthermore the tax also promised to remain carbon neutral and promised to cut corporate and private income tax. British Columbia has become the province with the lowest income tax regime and the lowest corporate tax regime (Greenery in Canada: We have a winner). Although the carbon tax is being praised by many, it still faces concerns as many still argue the ineffectiveness of the tax and what that means for the province.
Justin Trudeau is the 23rd Prime Minster of Canada and is the Leader of the Liberal Party of Canada. Son of the late prime minister Pierre Trudeau, Justin followed in his fathers footsteps. Graduating with a bachelor’s degree from the McGill University and a degree in education from the University of British Columbia. Trudeau worked as a teacher for many years, before making his political debut. In 2006, he chaired the Liberal Party’s task force for youth renewal. Trudeau was later appointed MP of Papineau in 2008, and is still current representing that riding. When running for office, Trudeau stated he would increase tax on those who were wealthy and tax cuts for the middle class, he also stated that he would address Canada’s climate change
For the last two decades, the increased use of fossil energy caused the environmental problems. The evidence of global warming, like drying rivers, extinction of species, melting of glaciers, became more often around the planet. The climate change became a threat to healthy environment and prosperity of humanity and wildlife, and the world community started searching for solution to combat climate change. In 2008 British Columbia introduced carbon tax on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to reduce global warming. Starting from $10 per tonne of CO2, the price was increasing annually till it reached $30 per tonne in 2012. During that period British Columbia was reducing harmful emissions and improving economy comparing to the rest of Canada. However, since the price rise on carbon stopped in 2012, no improving changes in cutting emissions, economy, and overall quality of life have been noticed. In this essay I will persuade that British Columbia should continue gradually increase price on carbon tax to the level where it will significantly cut the use of dirty energy, provide enough investments into the green projects, and support low-income families.
The Canadian Energy Strategy was posed in 2012 by the then current premier Alison Redford. The goal of the initiative was collaboration with the rest of the provinces to help increase transportation capacity of oil-sands bitumen and crude for exportation. There was much objection from environmentalists and Frist Nations communities. This strategy was propagated as a fundamental phase of growth not only for Alberta, but all
The Canadian Energy Strategy was posed in 2012 by the then current premier Alison Redford. The goal of the initiative was collaboration with the rest of the provinces to help increase transportation capacity of oil-sands bitumen and crude for exportation. There was much objection however from environmentalists and Frist Nations communities. This strategy was propagated as a fundamental phase of growth not only for Alberta, but all the
If there were criteria for an appalling prime minister, that would include insensitivity towards our environment and coldness towards growing social issues, and Stephen Harper proves to fit this perfectly. This essay will be focusing on his disregard for our environmental issues, cold bloodedness towards the Canadian LGBTQ+ community, and his blatant racism. Stephen Harper was an abhorrent prime minister, his ideas were medieval and he was weak in his ways of taking care of our social and environmental needs. To begin, Stephen Harper cared very little for Canada’s environmental needs. He has silenced Canadian scientists[1] who studied man-made climate change, climate change that gave us the hottest year on record in a century in 2015[2].
The following paper will provide an overview of Canada’s current climate change policy, under the Trudeau administration. Then, an overview of the climate change policy for the Trump administration will be introduced. Finally, Canada’s options in the face of these circumstances will be introduced, along with the decision that should be made for Canada’s future policy on climate change.
The pledges and positions of Canada’s federal parties are important. How federal parties promise to address climate change may play a role in October’s election. And the outcome of that election will determine Canada’s international position going into the Paris talks in December.
Climate change in America is getting worse everyday and can destroy many of living organisms including humans; therefore, humans need to cut our greenhouse gas emissions fast or, oceans will be dramatically changed, the ice will melt causing floods, and the changing in weather causing severe damage. These are major issues that need to be resolved if we are planning on making a bright future on earth.
A sensible plan of creating new advances innovation to decrease greenhouse gas emissions, which they did with acid rain. “ Canada ought to accomplish more, as we are quite a small part of the global issue,” said Brian Mulroney.