Coke Vs. Pepsi
When people think of soft drinks, one of two companies come to mind: Coca-Cola or Pepsi. Both companies dominate the global market in soft drink sales. With such a global presence between the companies, there will be an obvious conflict between the two titans of soft drinks. This is seen almost daily, whether it’s on television, magazines, or billboards; it’s not hard to find an advertisement for either company. In 2013, Pepsi posted a Halloween advertisement taking a jab at Coca-Cola. It showed a can of Pepsi wearing a cape that looked like a can of Coke. Above that, it said, “We wish you a scary Halloween!” Coca-Cola fired back, posting the same advertisement but changed the wording, stating, “Everybody wants to be a
…show more content…
Coca-Cola use of the rhetorical appeal, logos, like Pepsi, is not prominent in this advertisement either. The Halloween advertisement was an uncommon response from Coca-Cola. Pepsi likes to go after Coca-Cola, while Coca-Cola tends to take the high-road. For years it has been Pepsi making the attacks with no response. From a logical standpoint, humor can be used to make an advertisement more memorable, that’s not easily forgotten. But, a negative consequence of this is it provides publicity to both companies; good or bad it still gets the viewer thinking about both soft drinks.
The next rhetorical appeal, ethos, plays the biggest factor in the Halloween advertisement. The original creator of the advertisement, Pepsi, is one of three major soft drink creators (Dr. Pepper being the third). Pepsi, while not having as much time as Coca-Cola to establish themselves, is still known as well all around the world. The viewers can assume that Pepsi is attempting to make fun of Coca-Cola and bring in more Pepsi drinkers with a Halloween theme. Fans of Pepsi will see it as an attempt to encourage others to drink Pepsi because Coke is “scary.” Yet, to fans of Coke not aware of the war between Coca-Cola/Pepsi, could see it as an attempt to label Coke drinkers as scary in a light-hearted way.
Coca-Cola uses ethos the same as Pepsi. With Coca-Cola being the first and largest creator of soft drinks, it’s not hard to find a
Let us start by exploring what made Coke’s commercial such an emotional appeal in the first place. This ad is absolutely stuffed with emotional moments. The commercial starts off by showing a clearly injured Mean Joe limping through the tunnel of a stadium. Viewers are immediately drawn in by curiosity. “What’s wrong with Mean Joe?”, they wonder. A curious audience is one that is sure to pay close attention to the rest of the advertisement. This also works towards the pathos of the commercial by invoking worry in the audience. Next, we see a child walking behind Mean Joe and holding a bottle of Coke. This is also a very intentional use of pathos. A small child holding the Coke is much more emotional and entertaining than a thirty-year-old man would be. The kid then asks Mean Joe if he needs any help and tells him that he thinks he’s “the best ever.” Coke clearly used pathos here to make the audience adore the child and see him as cute. Mean Joe responds with a
Rhetorical analysis of 7-Up ad 1957 “Youngest Customers in the Business” reads an ad from the Ladies’ Home Journal magazine, published in 1955. Even though the headline might be a bit odd, a person might consider the context and understand why the ad was believable. The 1950s were known to use little kids in print ads. In the ad, 7-Up appeals to reader’s emotions, especially mothers would pause to see what the baby was drinking and if it could benefit them. The advertisement utilizes the three rhetorical appeals of pathos, logos, and ethos through its image and implied meanings, through this, the image is able to convey a vivid sense of nutritional value from drinking a 7-Up.
The Coca-Cola commercial, “Falling,” illustrates a rhetoric marketing image between two shy teenagers at an amusement park. The shy teenage boy exchanges a timid smile to the girl after getting a Coke from the Coca-Cola vending machine. The boy looks for confidence in his Coke and sits on the same bench as the girl, who is also drinking a Coke. Once the boy sits down, the music changes to the chorus “I was falling for you” and the couple is pictured on a roller coaster, swinging, eating popcorn, drinking Coke with
Message execution – There is some support for more than one execution technique. Some may point out “personality symbol” because of the characters involved and the association between Coca-Cola and Charlie Brown. However, the technique of personality symbol is one that generally sees a specific character attached to the brand in a more long-term manner. Some may argue for “mood or image.” Certainly, with this being an emotional ad, there is a mood/image that is being conveyed. But the best argument is likely for “slice of life.” This problem/solution format shows everyday “people” confronting a problem that is solved by the brand. In this case, the problem is presented by two characters fighting over the beverage. The solution is
In the reading Advertisements R Us, Melissa Rubin expands upon her analysis of Coca-Colas’ 1950 magazine advertisement, and brings many points to light about how the company uses cleverly crafted advertising tactics to appeal to a specific group of Americans. By clearly communicating her evidence to back up the analysis of the advertisement, Ruben composes a thoughtful and persuasive paper. For example, Rubin explains how simple details, such as the use of their slogan on the vending machine pictured which reads “Drink Coca-Cola - Work Refreshed”, and the placement of “Sprite Boy” in the ad, all work together to send a message that makes consumers want to buy their product. Consequently, because of the evidence presented in her writing, Rubin has crafted a paper that I find logical and persuasive.
1. Using the current ratio, discuss what conclusions you can make about each company’s ability to pay current liabilities (debt).
Coca-Cola’s confidence in its domination over the soft drink industry eroded, and its advertising slogans began to recognize industry competition: “No Wonder Coke Tastes the Best”. While Coke’s slogans have always centered on the product, Pepsi’s advertisement emphasized the users of the product. Rather than targeting every market, Pepsi focused on the demographic environment. Pepsi foresaw the mass appeal of the youth generation for soft drinks and in 1961 divulged the successful slogan “Now, It’s Pepsi, for Those Who Think Young”. The campaign was such a success that Pepsi’s sales growth outperformed that of Coca-Cola.
This is a financial comparison between Pepsi and Coca Cola in terms of company liquidity, solvency, asset management, profitability, and valuation between the years 2008 and 2009 respectively.
Throughout the course of this essay a rhetorical analysis will be performed over the subject of the popular soft drink, Coca Cola. Here we will take a look at two documents, both advertisement images, both from Coca Cola, separated by over 40 years. This sweet drink took the world by storm starting in the 1890’s and has been a household name since. With hundreds of thousands of soft drinks all over the world, Coca Cola is just another in a bucket, except with a different set of tactics toward drawing in their consumers.
For more than a century, Coca Cola and PepsiCo have been the major competitors within the soft drink market. By employing various advertising tactics, strategies such as blind taste tests, and reward initiatives for the consumer, they have grown to become oligopolistic rivals. In the soft-drink business, “The Coca-Cola Company” and “PepsiCo, Incorporated” hold most of the market shares in virtually every region of the world. They have brands that the consumers want, whether it be soft-drink brands or in PepsioCo’s case, snacks. With only one soft-drink market, the two competitors have no choice but to increase sales by stealing the other competitor’s clients. This led to the term, the “cola wars” which was first used
As we all go about our day, we rush to place to place. Around us there are things for sale, people everywhere trying to make money. As we are rushing around, we all tend to get thirsty as we have a thousand things going on. In America we have dozens of choices when it comes to soft drinks, although the two most widely known are Coca-Cola and Pepsi. Many are often stuck between choosing Coke or Pepsi; even though they are slightly different in appearance, taste, and price it makes a world of difference to the customer.
Coca-Cola is a leading beverage industry in the United States and many other countries in the world. PepsiCo is also a leading worldwide beverage company, but they are also the parent company of the Frito-Lay and Quaker Oats Companies. This makes PepsiCo a leader in the beverage, snack and cereal industries. As consumers, we have indulged in their products for many years. My personal preference has always been Pepsi over Coke, which is why I was very interested in conducting this analysis. Regardless of the results, I will always seek out a Diet Pepsi over a Diet Coke and so will many of my physician friends at Children’s Hospital who start their mornings with a Diet Pepsi. These personal preferences are what contributes to a company’s profits through net sales. However, the key performance measurement tools used are not based on sales alone. Calculating liquidity, solvency, and profitability ratios on a regular basis give us a better insight on the performance and overall health of a company.
Since EVA is positive for both proposals, the division 's current EVA would improve by $542,000 and therefore both proposals would be accepted. The decision is also in the best interest of the company.
In an industry dominated by two heavyweight contenders, Coke and Pepsi, in fact, between 1996 and 2004 per capita consumption of carbonated soft drinks (CSD) remained between 52 to 54 gallons per year. Consumption grew by an average of 3% per year over the next three decades. Fueling this growth were the increasing availability of CSD, the introduction of diet and flavored varieties, and brand extensions. There is couple of reasons why the industry is so profitable such as market share, availability and diversity and brand name and world class marketing.
Despite its relation to obesity and other health risk, soda still remains as a popular beverage in the United States, and upon other demographic groups. Amongst the lineup of refreshments, Pepsi and Coca-Cola are the most leading carbonated cola beverage brands around the world. Pepsi and Coca-Cola had been rivals when introduced respectively in the 1900s, trying to dominate the carbonated soft drink market. Through print ads and video ads, both brands were undergoing global advertising war trying to dominate each other. Between the two brands, Coca-Cola seem to be superior to Pepsi due to it’s creative advertisements that grabs consumer’s attention. Coca-Cola portrays rhetorical strategies within the advertisement to catch the audience’s attention by using ethos, pathos, and logos.