7 December 2017
Why College Athletes Should Not Be Paid
In, recent years, there has been much controversy over whether college athletes should be paid. The argument has primarily consisted of whether college athletes deserve special monetary treatment over the other students at universities. Some athletes are starting to feel exploited because the universities are using the players in their advertising campaigns. These students aren’t receiving any financial compensation for their images being used in the media. These athletes are bringing in millions of dollars to their schools in sponsorships, but what are they getting in return? College athletes should have their full tuition, meals, and housing paid for, but the school should not be responsible for giving these student athletes money for playing. The school should not be responsible for paying the athletes because college athletes are financially irresponsible, college athletic programs cannot afford to pay athletes, playing sports is a privilege, and it would remove athletes’ competitive nature and passion for the game.
Being paid to play? A debate that has been talked about for quite some time now on campuses and across the college conferences. Of course, you have those people who would agree and say yes, they should be paid because colleges make a lot of money through their football and basketball programs. Student athletes are being exploited if they don’t get a
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysGet Access
Joe Posnanski, a sports journalist and former columnist for Sports Illustrated, weighed in on the controversial issue of college athletes receiving money as a service of their play. “College Athletes Should Not Be Paid” published 2011 from the Norton Sampler starts off by introducing one of his main arguments that “College athletics are not about the players” (Posnanski 585) but instead are about the alumni and the colleges themselves that people support. If player on a team left and made their own team would that colleges alumni now support their semi-pro team, no chance. College Supporters love the youthful feeling and the how close they feel too it. He shows how big time college athletes do get paid in tuition, room and board, food,
What amount of money should college athletes be paid? This has been a controversial question for many years.Some lower level Division One NCAA athletes think that their scholarships do not pay them enough as it is, and instead they want cash rather than the scholarship. These situations have been taken to court and arbitrated in NCAA hearings. The NCAA, or the National College Athletics Association, has declined for the athletes to be paid a salary every time when they surmise that they should. There are so many reasons why the NCAA has declined for these athletes to be paid and have proven to be naive. The NCAA should not be conciliatory on
Kim Kardashian’s ex lover is not just famous for dating a “Kardashian”; he was more famous for the controversial issue with the NCAA due to proceeds given to him for his ability on the field. Reggie Bush made a lot of accomplishments while being a college athlete. Because of his skills, he was rewarded an amount of money. While Reggie Bush was playing at the University of Southern California, statistics show that the college generated roughly fifty-five million dollars. That’s a lot of money for one athlete to bring in. Every day we hear more and more stories about NCAA investigators and colleges being punished for “paying” players. However, college athletes bring in a lot of money. Therefore, they should get a percentage whether it is a small amount or a large amount. It will depend on the athletes’ ability. While some may argue that paying college athletes to play is wrong, college athletes have a marketable skill and should be paid for their skill.
In the spring of 2014, the Northwestern University football team did something that has never been done before in the history of college sports. Several scholarship players voted on whether the team should unionize. These same players believe that they should be compensated for their play on the athletic field. Countless collegiate sports fans also believe that college athletes from around the country should be compensated for playing sports; however, paying college athletes would cause multiple problems in college athletics. Most people do not understand how much student athletes are given to them free of charge just to attend a university, while the majority of other average students are stuck with the burden of paying for their education. College athletes should not be paid since schools do not have the money to pay student athletes, it would not be fair for athletes who do not play football or basketball, and they have athletic scholarships that allow them to receive a free education.
Should NCAA Athletes be paid? Getting paid to compete in collegiate sports has become a hot topic of debate for the world of sports. Many sports analyst would argue that without athletes, the big money in college sports disappears. Some sports analyst would say that college athletes are already paid when athletes receive an education. Both sides of the argument have valid points. Is there a price for education? Should athletes benefit from revenue generated from games?
The question whether “If college athletes should get paid or not?” has been debated for many years. The debate is brought up every year during the NCAA men’s basketball, March Madness competition, and starts again when football season begins. College athletes do provide entertainment for sports fans, but all the benefits that they do receive should limit them from being paid. The benefits student athletes obtain is free tuition, health coverage, and an opened opportunity for their future.
“ Let’s go,” are the sounds of crazy fans at the NCAA March Madness event with fans yelling and cheering nonstop. You can feel the adrenaline rush and it feels like a real NBA basketball game. The stage is big and the atmosphere is unbelievable. As the players come out, you can see how they feel that all their effort and time has been leading up to this incredible moment. They all seem like professionals, but wait, these athletes do not get paid. The NCAA does not pay athletes no matter how good or bad they are. I believe the NCAA should pay them because college sports are their full time job and the media will overall benefit colleges and strike the players.
The dispute about whether college athletes should be paid or not is a continuing argument that will continue to make people bump heads for many years to come. Many people believe that it's truly unfair for college athletes to bring revenue for their college and not receive any percentage of the revenue. For example, many athletes and fellow spectators believe that jersey sales should go back to the athlete that represents the jersey. However, there are many questions to be answered and I believe college athletes should not be paid more than they already are.
Every year in the United States thousands of collegiate student-athletes participate in a variety of different sports, and currently they do not receive paychecks for their performances. College athletics have attained an extensive popularity increase among Americans over the past few decades. The result - increased revenues for the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA); therefore, the participating colleges are fueling the debate of whether or not college athletes should collect an income. College athletes should not be paid to play because it will negatively affect their college experience. Rather, they should be compensated for their dedication to the sport. Many student athletes accept scholarships to play at a college or university, which allows the student to attend the school for free. This is fair compensation to the athlete as a college education today can cost as much as $20,000 to even $50,000 at some higher level schools. Essentially, they earn a free education and in return they have the opportunity to represent their school in a particular sport. Furthermore, athletes will begin to feel like they are playing at a professional level and that is exactly what they are not.
For a long time now, college sports have become the core of higher level education systems. College athletes have assumed a very important role in the overall college experience. These courageous, determined players lift the spirits of a vast amount of people in audiences all around the world. As one already knows, these athletes attract millions of fans each year and as such successfully bring in millions of dollars. Should they be entitled to a portion of this money while financial support for academics falls behind? Although college athletes massively increase profits for their school, they should not be paid in order to achieve balance between academics and athletics.
this case, the question is whether or not college athletes should be paid. I do not feel as though college athletes should be paid because it is unethical and pointless to reward them any more than what they already receive. A free education is one of the best gifts anyone can receive, what more could a person really want on top of that? The purpose of college athletics are to help athletes continue their careers with the intention or goal of later going on into the professional athletic field; therefore, this should be a free stepping stone for them until they enter a bigger pool of sharks where the competition is better and higher, and pay is actually mandated because of the skill level.
Dribble, Dribble, Swish Jimmy with the 3.This Essay is about College Athletes are not being treated fair after all their hard work of going to games across their state and country and not getting paid for it, and some of them are not so smart all they know and think about in College is their sport that they are in.College Athletes are not children they are grown ups and grown ups need cash to live.
Over several decades, there has been the incessant question of whether college athletes should be compensated for his or her talent. The question has even lead to lawsuits over the more recent years. Although many athletes don’t have enough time to work and pay for school, the benefits derived from just attending college is far greater. As a result, college athletes should not be compensated for their abilities on the field.
“ We do have hungry nights that we don't have enough money to get food in “ said Shabazz Napier. College Athletes around the country do not have enough money to feed themselves and the NCAA gives players a very little amont of money which limits there options. A College Athlete should never be in a situation where they are deciding wether they are going to pay for there next meal or put gas in there car. Most people did not know that College Athletes can not get a job due to certain guidelines. Scholarships often do not cover the full living expenses of an Athlete. Therefore it can be seen through one’s point of view that college athletes should be paid because they are unable to get a job due to NCAA regulations and shortage of time due
Sports, one of the most popular hobbies in the world. Sports has been around for centuries, as individuals have the competitive edge and drive to win. Many people dream of playing sports at the highest level, even though only a few athletes make it past high school. According to the NCAA, only about 6% of high school athletes play at the college level. The opportunity to be able to play in college is remarkable.