College Football Players Should Not Be Paid

1481 Words May 5th, 2015 6 Pages
College football players have never been financially compensated for their participation outside of usual academic scholarships. Skyrocketing revenue figures for colleges are now challenging that tradition. With those earning reaching eight figures for large-market institutions, players are looking to get their fair share of the prize (Siebold). The players believe that their schools should not be allowed to capitalize on their services, and therefore they should be monetarily rewarded (Cooper 12). This proposal essentially upends the ideals of college athletics. College football players should not be paid in order to preserve their amateur status and uphold the prototype of the student-athlete. The issue of paying college football players is relatively new. Large television events like bowl games have grown exponentially in recent decades (Siebold). As a result, schools have been taking advantage and bringing home incomes as large as $104.5 million dollars (Zimabalist 7). This creates a conundrum in the sense that the players are generating most of the income with nothing to show for it. The most significant court case to date that addresses the issue is O’Bannon v. NCAA. Former UCLA basketball player Ed O’Bannon brought the case against the NCAA in July of 2009 after noticing a player modeled after himself to the last detail in a basketball video game (Zimbalist 30). O’Bannon’s observation garnered support from other athletes who noticed their likeness being used without…
Open Document