Community oriented programs that bring the police and corrections together are some of the most significant programs within the criminal justice system. They play a significant role in crime prevention and build community relationships with the police. Our program is called “Drug Alternatives for Adolescents (DAA)”; it is a community oriented program that focuses on drug use in adolescents within the Poughkeepsie school district. DAA works closely with the police as well as the community to keep drugs off the streets and out of the reach of our children. The heart of the program comes from the slogan; “Drug education is the foundation for cooperation; working together, learning together, BETTER together.” We chose this to be our slogan because our program revolves around drug education, and keeping adolescents away from drugs. The program wants to make juveniles comfortable enough to cooperate with the police in the district where they reside as well as feel a sense of safety within their communities. “Working together, learning together, BETTER together” really expresses what our program is all about. We want our program to get students, teachers, and police working closely to make the entire community a better place for everybody. Drugs tend to be prominent in less fortunate communities being that it is cheap and accessible. Drugs are easily accessible, especially in lower class communities. . A study found that, “In 2013, an estimated 4.5 million adults aged 18 or older
Children, starting as early as elementary school, are being educated on substance abuse. As of 2013, Drug Abuse Resistance Education, D.A.R.E., administers a school-based substance abuse, gang, and violence prevention program in 75 percent of the United States school districts. Since 1983, 70,000 police officers have taught the D.A.R.E. program to approximately 114 million elementary through high school students in the United States alone ("Is the D.A.R.E. Program Good for America's Kids K-12?"). This program is aimed at preventing drug use in elementary, middle, and high school students. A needle-exchange program implicitly encourages the exact opposite message, condoning immoral and illicit behavior. Governments should focus on discouraging drug use, providing more productive treatment for recovery, and punishing drug users instead of supplying the materials to continue their addiction. Young children have the potential to take more risks and must receive a clear message on drugs, which should coincide with the no tolerance policy they are being taught in school with implementation of the D.A.R.E. program. A needle-exchange program is more of a hopeful harm reduction campaign that sends the wrong message to young children and society as a whole. If there is to be a positive change in America regarding intravenous drug use, then the government and school programs all need to be on the same page; we
Society today has been clouded and somewhat overtaken by social drugs. Wherever you may look, a drug is being used, whether it is more commonly a cigarette being smoked on the street, or the covert teens smoking marijuana in secluded areas. In any case, there is not one person who can say drug use is not prevalent, since society has made it clear through news, music and everyday life. However, there are certain drugs that seem to be worse than others, and society once again has taught us that through our laws and restrictions. The worse the drug, the more you pay for having it. Basically, drugs have become a part of our life, and you never know when they can land on your doorstep.
As Chief I have decided to form an 8-unit task force. This operation will be a collaborative effort involving both the Virtual Police Department and other appropriate “partner” agencies within the criminal justice system. We have decided that there will be 6 departmental units that will be included on the task force from the Virtual Police Department. Our Patrol and Investigations commanders will lead the way in leading the unit to stopping this unethical crime. Our Patrol, Narcotics/Vice, Criminal Gangs and Canine units will lead the charge in the field! They will investigate and leave no stone unturned until we find the individuals we are looking for. We will also use our Evidence Locker to store any evidence that we collect as we build our case. Unfortunately not all units will be part of this task force. These include our Aviation, Animal Control, School Resource Officers and Cybercrime units. We have more of a need for them in other areas where crime is on the rise. We will also be using two other non-departmental units from the Criminal Justice System. These will include the local judicial office our Court, and our local DEA agency… We will lead this proposal by talking about our units that we will be using in the task force…
While drugs attract users in all economic levels, it appears to be especially prevalent among those living in poverty. One possible explanation is that at the poverty level there is little
Crime is defined as an act or omission that the law makes punishable. There are different ways in dealing with crime. One, our current system, is the criminal justice approach. Also known as retributive justice, this system is more offender directed than anything else. The other system, which many people think is better, is the community justice, or restorative approach. The restorative approach is much more victim oriented. There is a debate over which system should be used to deal with crime. The two differ in many ways.
Community corrections, also referred to as community supervision, are those sentences that are carried out in a community setting apart from any jail or prison. These sentences are then enforced by agencies with legal authority over the offenders. According to the most recent study from the Bureau of Justice Statistics, approximately 1 in 53 adults in the United States is serving a sentence under community supervision (Bonczar & Kaeble, 2016). With the goals of contributing to public safety and reducing future criminal behavior, community corrections officials have their hands full and their resources stretched thin. On a daily basis they tackle the responsibility of monitoring offenders and assessing an offender's probability of re-offending, and then concentrating the greatest effort on those who are most at risk. With such large numbers serving community based sentences, we have to ask whether or not these programs are actually working to reduce recidivism.
There are many people that play an important role in maintaining safety and equality in the communities we live in. As a research topic, I got a chance to learn a little about some of the different professions in the criminal justice system. Based on individual interviews, I will discuss my findings from members of law enforcement, the court systems and the correctional department. The representatives interviewed were: a Sheriff Deputy working patrol from the Sacramento County Sheriff’s Department, a Criminal Defense Attorney from a private practice law firm, a Deputy Probation Officer from the Sacramento Probation Department and also a sheriff’s deputy from the Sacramento County Main Jail. This paper will present a brief overview of their jobs, their personal views on their careers and department goals and a summary of what I learned.
D.A.R.E. is “perhaps the most widely acclaimed ‘successful’ intervention of all ineffective delinquency prevention programs” (2003:130). Drug Abuse Resistance Education (D.A.R.E.) is a City of Los Angeles Government substance abuse prevention education program that seeks to prevent the use of controlled drugs, membership in gangs, and violent behavior. Founded in Los Angeles in 1983 as a joint initiative of the-LAPD chief Daryl Gates and the Los Angeles Unified School District as a demand-side drug control strategy of the American War on Drugs. Students who enter the program sign a pledge not to use drugs or join gangs and are informed by local police officers about the government 's beliefs about the dangers of recreational drug use in an interactive in-school curriculum which lasts ten weeks. (www.dare.com, 2005). According Howell, 2003 D.A.R.E. is deterrence and the notion that giving school aged children educational information on the consequence of alcohol and drug use by police officers will deter them from experimenting and using these substances (Howell, 2003). This popular program spread wide throughout the United States public schools, but the D.A.R.E. program has been put through many evaluations. Critics of the D.A.R.E. program point to the many studies which find no statistically significant short or long term effects on the key outcome variables of substance use among those who do and do not participate in D.A.R.E. (Drulak, 1997; Rosenbaum and Hanson, 1998;
Do Canadian police agencies implement community policing, and problem oriented policing? and if so do they work? In this paper, this paper will examine the two different styles of policing in a contemporary society. Community policing where the main emphasis is that the police and the community work together on issues, and problem-oriented policing where the police try and understand specific issues within the community. It will also examine several examples of different policing agencies in Canada, and what they implement for community policing, and problem oriented policing programs, and most importantly are they community policing, or problem oriented? Like many thing in life there are always critics of different ideas, so it will also examine the criticism on both of these policing styles.
Community justice is a broad term that includes many aspects of involving the community. The main goal is to enhance the lives within the community through the creation of problem solving strategies and strengthening the standards within the community by restoring victim’s quality of life, and reintegrating offenders of crimes. Although community justice can be traced back hundreds of years. The model is still considered a nontraditional approach in today’s criminal justice sector. Due to its broad range practitioners that choses to implement using community justice within their agency has many different options for practicing the model.
These programs are implemented for several reasons, that include to collect general support for the police and for increases in police resources. They are important in that they allow police to provide information to the public on how to avoid being victimized or (for youth) how to avoid being involved in crime. Drug Abuse Resistance Education (D.A.R.E.) is a perfect example of a public education program. It was founded in Los Angeles in 1983, and is a police officer-led series of classroom lessons that teaches children from kindergarten through grade 12 how to resist peer pressure and live productive, drug and violence-free lives. The effectiveness of the program is often debated, it was implemented in 75% of U.S.
Mission statement, The Office of Community Oriented Policing Services of the U.S. Department of Justice describes community policing as, "community policing focuses on crime and social disorder through the delivery of police services that includes aspects of traditional law enforcement, as well as prevention, problem-solving, community engagement, and partnerships. The community policing model balances reactive responses to calls for service with proactive problem-solving centered on the causes of crime and disorder. Community policing requires police and citizens to join together as partners in the course of both identifying and effectively addressing these issues."
I, Gracie Woodyard, as the president of this fraternity select “Reducing Crime through a Targeted Literacy Program” as the sole recipient of our funds to combat youth drug crime in our community. While all three proposals gave strong arguments as to why their organization should receive our funds, programs similar to that stated in proposal two by Marcia Brady, John Walton, and Samantha Stephens have shown more success in the reduction of drug related crimes when compared to the ‘law and order’ techniques used by the Drug Abuse Resistance Education (DARE) which is described in proposal one and the presence of neighborhood patrols described in proposal three.
Community policing is considered to be one answer of how to maintain social area. It is considered as collaboration between the police and the community in which it seeks to identify and solve community problems. Community policing has a mission to enhance the quality of police services. Community policing has evolved over the years encountering several benefits as well as criticism, developing initiatives and a host of programs. Community policing focuses on crime and social disorder through the delivery of police services that includes: traits of traditional law enforcement, as well as problem solving, prevention, partnerships, and community engagement.
Community relations with law enforcement is a daunting and a intimidating task. Over the years, the media has shown positive and negative interactions of law enforcement officers and the public. When crime or negative interactions are capture via cell phone and upload into cyber space; it circulates around the world faster than a blink of an eye. For instance, if a police officer stopped a citizen on the street for whatever reason; some people will not make anything of the encounter. However, if the encounter gets out of hand, that is when the people around the area start to pull up their phones and begin the recording process that can show an officer using force. It is imperative that local and other types of governments around the world find and change their ways whenever officer encounter community members, especially in urban minority areas. Professor Gonzales (2017) stated that, “many Central and Eastern European countries have experienced totalitarian governments, where the national police agencies were often used to intimidate and rule their citizens” (Gonzales, 2017). Although, this is extremely unfortunate, these community members from different parts of the country have been created a mistrust with their own police leaders. Ultimately, something ought to be changed. Where do we start? Law enforcement leader should put more emphasis on ethical considerations and leadership. Hence, it is crucial that law enforcement leader build and establish and regain trust and