preview

Conflict Management Case Summary

Decent Essays

In evaluating the conflict, I interpreted the parties’ behavior based upon the Exchange Theory, in which Republic Services was willing to risk their relationship with the Eagle City Council and the residents of Eagle as they strived to minimize costs associated with workman’s compensation claims, as well as increase their rewards through additional revenue from additional containers serviced. Their goal of reducing workplace injuries had no data to correlate a connection of workplace injuries with plastic garbage bags. In fact, when Mr. Van Arnum initially addressed the policy change with Ms. Klein, he was informed that the decision was made to lesson workman’s compensation claims, in which Mr. Van Arnum asked for data showing how many claims …show more content…

I also question the thought process in allowing paper bags during a four week period in November is a safer alternative than plastic garbage bags. I don’t feel paper bags would protect their employees any better from broken glass and Sharps, paper bags don’t close at the top which enables homeowners to overfilled them, as well paper bags don’t have handles to grab which forces the employee to exercise SAFELIFT techniques during collection, which in turn could increase back injuries if not used or used improperly. In addition, I feel that Ms. Klein’s exhibited social exchange theory behavior; she went against the homeowners to enforce a policy that had no legal standing in exchange for the rewarding relationship of her employer. In essence, I feel like she threw the homeowners under the bus; she did whatever she felt was necessary to fulfill her employers wish. That being said, when the Eagle City Council announced that the plastic garbage bag restriction was not in the contract, Ms. Klein started to back pedal to save face. She indicated her and Republic Services’ assumption of the

Get Access