The insertion of human genes into mammals is not only inducing conflict into nature's ecosystems, but can result in a new intelligent, human-like species that needs proper regulations and authority. The study of transgenic, or chimeric animals has brought about some serious ethical issues. Many people are only aware of the issues when it regards the human race. However, transgenics play much more of a role than just to our society, but greater damage is done to nature's ecosystems. Many consequences may be unleashed once a transgenic animal escapes back into the wild. The potential harms may include "the alteration of the ecologic balance regarding feed sources and predators...and the disruption of reproduction patterns and their success," (Animal Biotechnology). The quick extinction and endangerment of these animals can dwindle …show more content…
As ground-breaking as it sounds, Glenn states "Further advances in the blending of nonhuman animal and human DNA could result — intentionally or not — in chimeric entities possessing degrees of intelligence or sentience never before seen in nonhuman animals...Could it be patented?" (1). Due to this progressing study, society is questioning whether or not if these animals become too human-like, whether they would need rights and regulations, since they will be technically "human". Even if so, it is uncertain whether these animals would follow these regulations. Humans are a very dangerous species, destroying both themselves and other species. With the intelligent, nightmarish human brain, chimeras have the power to dominate the human race. Mammals may disregard the rules, as humans do as well, thus creating a newer dominating minority that can lead to catastrophe. This issue is commonly overlooked, but it is indeed possible. Human DNA injections should be prohibited from being inserted into animals, too many dangers lurk within nature and society's
Why did scientists keep animal cloning a secret for so long? Did the scientists know that animal cloning would cause controversies? Do the bans on animal cloning actually prevent scientists from advancing cloning technology? Did scientists think that their discovery would help or even hurt the food industry? Animal cloning could help the food industry as long as its negatives do not outweigh the positives.
“Genetic engineering and selective breeding appear to violate animal rights, because they involve manipulating animals for human ends as if the animals were nothing more than human property, rather than treating the animals as being of value in themselves” (Source A). Even though genetic engineering violates animal rights, it can be good for animals as well. Such as improving their resistance to diseases and removing characteristics that cause injury (Example: a cattle without horns). However, the cons to genetically engineering animals offsets the pros. Whenever animals are genetically engineered, it can lead to abnormalities. These abnormalities can range from heart discomfort to physical abnormalities (i.e. a body growing too fast that the growth of the legs are not able to grow at the same speed not be able to withstand the weight of the body). The abnormalities that the animals would have to live with from genetical engineering would cause the animal much pain. Therefore enforcing the fact that genetic engineering on animals is
A genetically engineered animal is one that contains altered genetic material to give the animal new traits or characteristics. There are many animals that have been genetically modified for example, mice, pigs, cows and sheep are just a few of the animals they experiment on. Most genetic engineering is directed toward providing more benefits to our society which can be ethically contentious. In reproductive cloning (animal cloning) researchers remove a mature skin cell from the animal that they want to copy then, they transfer it into a egg that has removed its DNA-containing nucleus. The clones are superior breeding animals that will produce healthier offspring. There is both upsides and downsides to genetic engineering and animal cloning. In the United States animal cloning is regulated by the FDA or, Food and Drug Administration and for the most part is not considered to be illegal. There are also close to no laws regulating genetic engineering in animals in the United States.
“We can change animals faster and in more profound ways than nature does on its own, but the point is that there’s inherently sacred about a species genome- it’s an amorphous, ever changing thing.”(Anthes, 48) One of the biggest controversies of biotechnology is that people are getting God-like powers seems how now scientists are able to engineer new traits into animals. Is that wrong? Morally, maybe. The fact of the matter is whether it’s immoral or not, we’ve been doing it for thousands of years, but now just faster and actually more efficiently. Scientists don’t plan on worsening animals or abusing them. “If you’re going to modify a line of animals, the resultant animals should be no worse off from a welfare point of view – and preferably better.”(Bernard Rollin) If nations eventually accept biotechnology more openly, and simply apply regulations stating that one cannot produce an organism that is not better off than it was before. That would ensure the protection of animals from unnecessary handicapped lives, and then the FDA would be more comfortable with allowing these biotechnological advances to be released to the
According to Kathleen R. Brooks and Jayson L. Lusk (2011) Animal cloning is a process in which scientists can copy the genetic or inherited traits of an animal.
Since the inception of domestication approximately 10000 years ago, humans have been selectively breeding animals so that only their desirable traits remain, a process called artificial selection. Through artificial selection we have been creating species that perform tasks more efficiently and effectively, and serve our needs in a multitude of ways. Furthermore, the benefits of artificial selection are remarkably similar to genetically modified animals in many key ways. The increase in resilience, pharmaceutical benefits, and productivity are just a few of the many significant reasons why genetically modified animals should be supported and accepted in our world today.
Social: There should be some sort of legal control/law that need to be placed on the company/group of scientists, so that in the event of an unforeseen consequence during the gene manipulation process such as mutations/diseases which is uncontrollable, they may be held liable. This would ensure society that they are trying to do the process properly and not follow any shortcuts. Furthermore, a review of the genetically modified product should be in place before it can be handled or distributed anywhere outside of the laboratory, again ensuring society that the transgenic mammals will do no harm.
Although human interference in the breeding of animals has proven controversial it has nevertheless had an enormous impact upon modern society. Selective breeding over the years has had an effect not only on our yield of crops but on the animals we rear for meat, the clothes we wear and the animals we choose to domesticate as pets. It has permeated into almost every aspect of our society. Although it has arguably been a useful tool; it
themselves, their children, and others. He argues both sides of the issue and lays out the pros
In regards to animal safety the genetic abnormalities can be quite harmful. The numbers of genetically modified animals have dramatically increasing in the last 20 years. Mice and other poor animals are being bred specifically to have genes taken out or cells inserted. Tests are miles away from tests to help animals to many animals dying. Because when they are babies because of cruel people thinking that's it is ok to make animals that have ears on their backs, trying to make their own animals from poor defenceless rabbits, cats, dogs, mice, rats, primates, and so many more. These people are trying to play god and they must be stopped.
With all the good that may be on the way with the present findings, the ethical issues and potential for abuse of this knowledge is both heavy on the heads of scientists. In the 1998 article by Rick Weiss, the “human-animal chimera” seems off limits, however the research is now well underway. The article was published in the Washington Post and shows how we have strayed from our original intent:
You may know chimeras as a mythological beast but the government is going to try to make them a reality. In 2009, research on human animal hybrids was banned. Now the US is gearing up for continued research on the matter which could have some alien results.
One day these two scientist who are working for the army and they created a cat that was very deadly and was not afraid of anything whatsoever. This cat was genetically modified by two crazy scientist named Jeff, and Jeffery. All of the cats that made where highly dangerous to humans and to other animals.
Genetic engineering is the process whereby new DNA is added or existing DNA is altered in an organism 's genome. This may involve changing one base pair (A-T or C-G) or deleting entire sections of DNA or adding additional copies of a gene. This results in creating new traits that were not previously present in the organism’s genome. This is done to selectively breed desired traits or to create plants with increased resistance to pesticides and increased tolerance to herbicides. For example insulin is a protein that regulates sugar content in our blood and is produced normally in the pancreas. Genetic engineering is used to produce a form of insulin that is similar to yeast and bacterial cells. This genetically engineered insulin is called
Over the years, new innovations, ideas, and emerging technologies have transformed our society and our daily lives. These new discoveries have not only been developed to help make our lives easier, but to also help us live longer and stronger lives. Living in a world that continues to evolve, creates opportunities for new innovations and breakthroughs to arise within our society. Genetic engineering is just one of many examples of the advancements that young, intelligent minds have developed throughout the years. Genetic engineering is defined as “isolating a desirable gene” and injecting it into a plant or organism to produce “a desired characteristic” (Nutrition & Weight Control for Longevity, 2005). This biological technology has provided many advancement opportunities “for several industrial sectors such as agriculture, food manufacture and pharmaceuticals” (Rastall, 2002). Along with everything else in life, genetic engineering has some upsides and downsides. Today I am going to discuss the positive and negative outcomes that genetic engineering is recognized for in the agricultural industry.