Conspirator In Julius Caesar Research Paper

Julius Caesar (100-44BC) was one of the greatest men produced by ancient Rome and he remains today a famous personality in world history (Barlow 2005). The conspirators were wrong to murder Julius Caesar in three ways. Firstly, they were morally wrong in the removal of Caesar. Secondly, they failed to consider a practical benefit to Rome in the murder of Caesar, resulting in only more problems. Lastly and most importantly, the conspirators were wrong to murder Julius Caesar because they placed their interests before those of Rome.

In the determination of whether Julius Caesar was an intelligent, political hero or an egocentric, dictating villain, it is important to look at all of the facts. Born in 100 B.C.E. and assassinated in 44 B.C.E., Julius Caesar was legendary. He along Pompey, and Crassus created the first unofficial Triumvirate which was negotiated to appease both the Roman citizens and the power hungry rivals. Still, this agreement would not last long. After Pompey’s wife, Julia Caesar and daughter of Caesar’s daughter given to Pompey to establish the Trimvirate, dies in childbirth, civil war breaks out as Caesar leads his army against Rome. He fights until Pompey is murdered in Egypt. As Rome is “shattered,” Julius Caesar one person should rule. He

Julius Caesar, a Roman general, dictator, and leader, is considered to be one of history 's most influential and powerful rulers to this day, in which his rise to power, conquest of Europe, and controversial downfall all remain to be told during modern days. The play Julius Caesar written by William Shakespeare, portrays the events leading up to Julius Caesar’s assassination, and how those who conspired against him banded together and plotted Caesar’s demise. Many of those conspirators assassinated Caesar due to his quick rise to absolute power, his “acts” of disrespect against the senate such as his failing to stand to receive the title of becoming a “god,” and pure jealousy and anger towards Caesar’s success and rule over the Roman empire. Caesar, an ambitious man, was able to conquer many lands and peoples for Rome through successful military campaigns in which he became one Rome’s best generals due to the amount of successful battles he had won and the amount of blood he had shed for Rome’s expansion. However, Caesar’s trait of ambitiousness would prove to be a double edged sword.

Many Romans continued to honor Caesar and that began to anger the Roman politicians more and more. Caesar took many decisions in his hands and this put paid to the Roman senate. They wanted him out, but he had the hearts of the Roman people. They could not attack him publicly because they would risk their own lives. They had to find a way out of this predicament. The final straw for the Roman politicians was when Julius Caesar refused the crown three times in front of the crowd. Caesar has refused, saying he was not the king and therefore not eligible to wear that crown. He lived up to the expectation of his people and did all that was required of him. He spent so much time making Rome an empire to be feared that many politicians thought it was all for his own good. They felt he made Rome a very powerful country because he wanted to rule and wanted the power all to himself.

Julius Caesar (100-44 BC) was one of the most outstanding leaders in history. He was the first ruler of the Romano-Hellenic civilization and achieved his goals with great success throughout his life of 56 years. He was assassinated by the conspirators, who accused him for practicing tyranny. This essay will discuss whether it was right for the conspirators to murder Caesar and what its consequences were.

believing he had aspirations for kingship and ultimate power. These ideas were the start of a conspiracy against a man that they believed would be the downfall of their great Roman Republic. Ultimately his death was a result of various scruples against Caesar held by senators and some of Caesar’s closest friends, which created an animosity that made Caesar’s death inevitable.

The assassination of Julius Caesar in 44BC by conspiring members of the Roman senate was an effort to remove a dictator whose power had grown to extraordinary levels and to revive the Republic government. Caesar’s power span throughout the entire Roman Empire, which during his reign extended from present day Syria, down into parts of Africa, over to Spain, most of France and all of Italy. He had the favor of the people, military and most of the Roman government. Caesar’s death at the hand of conspirators did remove him from power; however, it did not restore the Republic government as the Senate had anticipated, on-the-other hand it gave rise to yet a more powerful dictator that was beyond what Caesar

On March 15th, 44 B.C., Roman politician Julius Caesar was stabbed repeatedly until death by a group of conspirators led by Marcus Brutus on the floor of the Roman Senate. This assassination came after Julius Caesar was reportedly about to be coronated by the rest of the Senate. Later that day, Brutus issued a statement to a crowd of citizens, stating that he and the conspirators had killed “a weak Caesar,” and not the “brave Caesar” the people had known. Marcus Brutus referred to the killing as an act “to save all of Rome from tyranny.”

All this comes down the last point that will be made in this essay, Julius Caesar’s assassins believed that what they were doing was what was best for the Roman Republic and its citizens. Caesar showed all the signs of becoming a corrupt king-like ruler. With the past experiences of Rome the men that killed Caesar just wanted to help the people they swore

Gaius and Publius Servilius Casca should be held accountable for the murder of Julius Caesar. According to the Ancient History Encyclopedia, “One of the Casca brothers slipped behind and with a sweep of his dagger stabbed him just below the throat.” This caused Julius to choke and he died in a few minutes due to blood loss and suffocation. As stated by the New York Post, “Publius Servilius Casca… stabbed him in the chest… Casca’s brother, Gaius Casca’s… blow was the fatal one.” “Casca gave him the first cut.” (source four) This proves that the first two strikes were the ones that killed him. As soon as his chest was pierced, he choked to death when his chest cavity filled with blood. These blows were the only ones that caused any damage, since the acts of the other conspirators merely symbolized their

Julius Caesar was a very influential figure in Roman history. Many features of the Roman Empire came from his reign as dictator. But what, specifically, were some of those great achievements? In this research paper, I will explain Julius Caesar’s youth, the Roman Republic before Caesar came to power, the Roman government before Caesar became dictator-for-life, the effects of Julius Caesar, the reasons for his assassination, and what affects there were when the public learned about his assassination.

In 1599 the famous English writer, William Shakespeare, wrote the play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. The story takes place toward the end of the Roman Republic in 44 BC in Ancient Rome. The play follows the words and actions of the Roman senators, plebeians and their emperor Julius Caesar. As the story begins, readers find out the many of the senators are not pleased with Caesar as a ruler of the Roman people. Two characters, Brutus and Cassius are especially passionate about killing Caesar to end his rule. Through discussing plans and creating alliances, the senators get their way and murder Caesar on the foreshadowed Ides of March. One question that comes up while reading the play is was Caesar’s assassination really justified by the murderers? Although he did show signs of hubris, or excessive pride, Caesar’s assassination by the conspirators was not justified because their reasons were based on theories and biased opinions, Caesar was a good man, and his murder was committed for the good of the people killing him and not for the good of Rome.

Dionisiy Christensen Ms. Crisler Ancient Literature 12 May, 2017 Julius Caesar Julius Caesar has been a great Roman politician, general, and notable author of Latin prose. Julius Caesar has been born in Rome, Italy. He has borned in a patrician family, also he has been a member of the Julian family. Julian family has been one of the first families in Rome.

Introduction Julius Caesar’s murder was a cold blooded murder that was conducted on a man who could not defend himself both physically and by law. The conspirators were not right in killing Caesar as this was a malicious act borne out of jealousy and threat; one that would plunge the state into another civil war. The conspirators had created a problem – unproven claims of tyranny - and in trying to deal with the problem, created a bigger problem for the state as a long period of war resulted. In the end, what the senators hoped to avoid became reality, Rome established emperors who were equivalent of kings.

Even though he was extremely unpopular, being in possession of the wealth he was, he was able to buy his way through the senate to the height of power. Caesar had majestically rose to power, partaking in every major position there was, using his political ingenious in his attempt to gain full control of Rome. After Crassus had died in battle, and Caesars’ army defeated and killed Pompey, he was quick to mop up all his opposition from the senate and the oligarchs across the Mediterranean and throughout Rome, in his first step to his dictatorship, his dictatorship being the final step to the republics decline. After defeating all of his enemies, Julius Caesar was granted a 10-year dictatorship for purposes of restoring the republic, similar to the title that Sulla had granted himself many years previous. However he constituted himself as the Divine King or Ruler of Rome, essentially a REX, yet as said before, since the founding of the Republic, the Romans prided themselves on freedom from the Etruscan King, and just the term ‘King’ went against the republic mentality. Eventually killed in plot involving over 60 senators, the death of Caesar concluded the decline of the Republic.