1. Contexts-dependent approach for participation
André et al. (2006) recommends the EIA process should be supportive to participants, well planned and focused on negotiable issues. These principles are more critical when dealing with the local communities in which the major projects would take place, as it will impact their livelihoods and their socio-cultural circumstances. Therefore, the participation of local communities during EIA should take into account their local values beyond the factual evidence (Bond et al. 2004, p.622).
Engaging local communities in EIA must be context-oriented, open and transparent in order to achieve real outcomes (André et al., 2006, p. 3). Context-oriented approach must be emphasized because many communities, especially within the diverse country like Indonesia, have their own rules, culture and social norms to environment protections. Thus, EIA process must be adapted into the social-cultural contexts of impacted communities (André et al., 2006, p. 3). These circumstances would mean that culturally appropriate methods must be used. This is also the case for EIA involving local indigenous population, as maintains by several authors that the current EIA do not engage indigenous communities meaningfully (O’Fairchaellaigh, 2009; Aslin et al. 2013). The latest controversy can also be found in the Benoa Bay Project in Bali Province, where the EIA process neglects the local wisdom and not culturally sensitive by design (Nurhayati 2013; Langenheim
The overall objective to this Goal is to ensure that the public is both involved in identifying, avoiding and minimizing environmental justice concerns. In addition, another objective to this Goal is maintenance and assurance of Tribal Relations. Furthermore, another objective is to maintain a database of national and community based organizations and networks concerned with environmental justice. Moreover, this goal has U.S.D.A. performance measures and target dates in similar fashion as the other
Environmental justice is a topic that plagues societies around the world, and has an impact on the opportunities available to admire the breathtaking world that is around us. Environmental injustice, in this case, is the lack of the equality and participation that is presented in communities. More likely than not, there is an absence
The provincial government’s failure to properly consult with the Mi’kmaq demonstrates how governments tend to favor economic development over the wellbeing of the people. The health of Indigenous Peoples is related to the health of their surrounding environments. What happens in these spaces affects them greatly. Because of their strong relationship with the environment, it is therefore important for Indigenous Peoples to be involved in decision-making and policy development in their communities. According to Black and McBean (2016), “Indigenous-centered policy frameworks should: recognize Indigenous knowledge, recognize Indigenous Peoples’ inherent right to self-determination, use inclusive and integrative knowledge systems, rely on community-based participatory approaches, and use circular and holistic viewpoints” (p. 12). In my research, I will explore how decision-making and participation should be done according to the Mi’kmaq
You've been working so hard all season long, and everything is leading up to this one tournament. The first game was awful with a loss of twelve to zero. The whole team is very sad and goes into the second game with a negative attitude. Because of that, you loose the second game as well and get knocked of the tournament. You think about how all your hard work just went to waste, but you sigh and remember that you’ll still earn a medal anyways just for participating. Lots of people in the media have been debating this topic recently, and the sides are pretty much split right in half. Lots of people think that participation trophies are a huge mistake, but others believe that those awards can
According to Aboriginal people, sustainability is perceived as an integral component when it comes to protecting the environment. The relationship between human rights and environmental issues and rights demonstrates the need to formulate a new human right to water rights. John Barry and Kerri Woods discuss the relationship between environmental right and human rights. They question “the assumed compatibility between human right and the environment.” Barry and Woods notice that people are often willing to choose human rights at the expense of the environment. It is problematic that people who are in favour of human rights would not agree that the environment should be protected. The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) clearly recognizes the importance of protecting the environment for the fulfillment and enjoyment of human rights. It is important to add environmental rights to the human rights discourse because people have a duty to future generations.
For the purpose of this question it is significant that I address the significance of working in partnership or ‘active participation’ ‘A way of working that regards individuals as active partners in their care rather than passive recipients’. Code of Practice,(p.5, 2015). The service users to identify strengths to enable empowerment, independence, choice and control for service users. COP 3, p.6 (2015). To show respect and dignity supporting service users voice ensuring their heard in order to help them make informed decisions about their own lives. (COP, 1.3). In addition preventing social exclusion, equally to maximize individual’s potential to lead a fulfilling quality of life. Particularly when supporting individuals with vulnerability
The process of collaboration forced the participants to breach their normative cultural boundaries. By contrast, it also means that those who are non-rural Westerners do not share values of hard work, family, and appreciation for small town lifestyles. Karuk tribe members and Klamath Irrigators normalized an identity based on localness as “insiders” rather than maintaining the traditional cultural hegemony of Euro-American Irrigators and Indigenous American Tribes(Ferguson 2004). NGO’s in many other western case studies of environmental management have been characterized as elitist outsiders representative of urban capital (Yung, Patterson, and Freimund 2010; Wilson 1997). Many of these descriptions also apply to environmental groups who are active in the Klamath basin, with headquarters often located in Portland, staffs comprised of lawyers, and the financial capacity for lengthy legal proceedings. The Othering of non-locals has become normative, as indicated from a quote from the end of Tucker’s opinion
Many people assume that indigenous people have never made mistakes in the way they treat the non-human world around them. This is not entirely a reality; many indigenous peoples did not start with already having traditions that treat the environment in positive and sustainable ways. With these mistakes being made in the beginning, the most important thing is that indigenous people recognized that their original ways harmed the non-human world around them and that they must begin to do something different to better treat nature. It is this way of thinking that has allowed for indigenous people to maintain in their traditions ways that will support the land. Indigenous peoples of the United States and China have traditions deeply rooted in their
For an Indigenous Person especially, natural resources constitute the basis of their livelihood, culture and identity. Supporting indigenous peoples to secure and defend their land and natural resource rights helps to develop frameworks for sustainable management of their lands, territories and resources for everyone else. The International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs is an International group that supports Indigenous partner organizations to lobby for the recognition of their collective rights to land and natural resources in laws and policies. They also carry out awareness raising activities, file court cases, undertake land demarcation and mapping, apply for land titles and develop land-use and management plans. Some of the work they have done for Indigenous Peoples include helping Indigenous groups with the development of their culture and identity, supporting Indigenous people’s rights to land and natural resources in Africa, territorial defence in the Peruvian Amazon, assisting indigenous communities in obtaining land titles in the Philippines and even restoring community rights over ancestral forests in India. This group proves to be a very effective measure in achieving recognition for the rights of natural resources for Indigenous Peoples in the way it ensures the protection of their access to natural resources at their own
Respect involves valuing the diverse types of Indigenous individual, cultural and community knowledge (Kirkness & Barnhardt, 1991). Further, it consists of recognizing that while evaluators may be “experts” in conducting evaluations, community members are experts regarding the knowledge systems of their own communities (van der Woerd, 2004). Applying the principle of relevance requires ensuring that that evaluation being done is connected to community and cultural needs and experiences (Kirkness & Barnhardt, 1991). Here, the evaluator must be clear about their intentions and the knowledge produced by the evaluation must be useful for the local governance (van der Woerd, 2004). Next, reciprocity consists of ensuring that everyone involved in
When an environmental organization is planning for projects and developing programmes, it ought to consider the environmental justice as a vital part in their planning because it is a basic human right. It is worth pointing out that the environmental justice movement share some similarities with the civil right movement as they both aim for equal protection and social justice irrespective of income, race, color, laws, and the place of origin. Unfortunately. there are many indigenous communities that have been historically and repeatedly marginalized and targeted with different abuses. For instance, in 1982, North Carolina state government forced a toxic landfill onto a small African community. Another example from the Pilgrims and Tourists film can be how the indigenous shaman opposes the government's
For Indigenous people the land is not just desert and dirt but is the core of their culture. The land is considered to be alive as it connects its people with their past ancestors. They have a physical as well as a profound spiritual connection with the land and for this reason they carry a responsibility to care for it. Indigenous peoples’ deep relationship with the land has made me recognize the importance of sacred sites around Australia and has made me better appreciate and not take for granted the natural resources that we have.
The Siwa Sustainable Development Initiative was constructed in an effort to enable private investment to develop a sustainable development environment in the Siwa region, as described above. According to reports, Environmental Quality International (EQI), the principal investor, brought about both technical expertise and practical experience to ensure the development of the region, especially the utilization of its rich natural resources and unique cultural heritage.
For my inclusive activity I have chosen to babysit my neighbour's children for the night while they go out and enjoy themselves at no cost to them. They will be gone from 4:00pm until 11:30pm. The people involved will be myself, their three children (Liam, Sarah and Conrad) and their parents. I will be doing this the night of Thursday, June 9th. This is out of character for me because I just recently moved into a new house and I am unfamiliar with the neighbourhood and the people in it. I have spoken with my next door neighbours and they are very hard working people and do not get much time to themselves having three young children to take care of. By doing this I am allowing them so take some time off from their busy lives
Chamala (1995) recognized efficiency benefits from participation, by stating that ‘involving stakeholders and empowering community participants in programs at all levels, from local to national, provide a more effective path for solving sustainable resource management issues’. When people participate, the development can have sustainability and the community will be benefited in many ways. Some of the main reasons why people are usually willing to participate include: ‘Community participation motivates people to work together, Community and recognize the benefits of their involvement, Social, religious or traditional obligations for mutual help, Genuine community participation’ (http://ec.europa.eu/echo/files/evaluation/watsan2005/).This indicates that, involving the community in development activity starts from the plan of the work and goes to the end implementation. It should take place at all level of the community. Even if this is the realty, the households’ response show that the majority of the community was not involved in such opportunity. In this case, (59) respondents which was 73.75% responded as they did not have the experience of awareness in all aspects and in all level. This response does not imply Zero participation of people, it is to mean that starting from the plan up to the end and all aspects to be discussed at all level of the