Solving issues of money with the American Government Administrative Agencies almost takes an act of God. Have you ever noticed that there are never wrong? I do not know of a case where the citizen prevailed without court involvement. Why is that? I often wonder how it would be possible to balance out the monetary issues between government agencies, corporate business and the consumer and public member. Let me give you an example; let’s say, for instance, an individual is going through a temporary financial problem that was resolved in a couple of months. During that time he wasn’t able to make a couple of his monthly bills such as his PG&E bill and AT&T bill. AT&T disconnects his services and he incurred late fees but he chooses to …show more content…
He is also charged a late fee of $30 that doubles each week until it’s paid. He is charged an administrative fee to reinstate the contract, his monthly bill for months and the lien fee of $175 plus the certified mail fee notifying him that he has missed his monthly payment. A $34 monthly storage fee just tripled all because AT&T required another deposit that he is sure he already paid. Two weeks later he receives a statement from AT&T informing him that they overcharged him for the deposit fee and his monthly statement with two late fees and that they will put credit on his account. Upset, he contacts AT&T and explains to them the problems that their mistake cost him and that he does not want a credit on his account he wants his money back so he can pay his storage and hopefully recover from the fees. AT&T denies giving him a refund stating that they only give credit on the customer’s account. When he explains all the additional costs because of their mistake they simply apologize and put the credit on his account two months later. My question to our governing authority is why is this happening? Why are they getting away with not refunding money? Why do they get to charge consumers late fees and reconnect fees and lien fees but we as consumers cannot charge them for the same thing? Why are administrative government and corporate companies allowed to keep our money, causes financial problems and charge us whatever fees they want whenever they want and they
Claim: The bill collector violates the law by calling even after client asked them to cease communication. Evidence: In the case, Mr. Smite’s phone call records will ratify the same.
A corporation was originally designed to allow for the forming of a group to get a single project done, after which it would be disbanded. At the end of the Civil War, the 14th amendment was passed in order to protect the rights of former slaves. At this point, corporate lawyers worked to define a corporation as a “person,” granting them the right to life, liberty and property. Ever since this distinction was made, corporations have become bigger and bigger, controlling many aspects of the economy and the lives of Americans. Corporations are not good for America because they outsource jobs, they lie and deceive, and they knowingly make and sell products that can harm people and animals, all in order to raise profits.
As a staff analyst, I think that there are many alternatives present which can save the Bank from a huge loss. Actually in this dispute I feel that Bank is right because they made it clear in the purchase order that the machines needs to be shipped through Yellow Freight and also paid the invoice before time as per their custom. But still the carrier was changed by Data Max without asking or informing the bank.
1. Give an example of a case that would fall under diversity jurisdiction. Explain all of the key elements of such a case.
In the case in the text where someone purchased a used safe at an auction for $50, but
3. For a crime to be committed, the prosecutor must be able to prove a criminal intent and an overt act to carry out that intent. Jack and Mary agreed to rob a series of banks. Prior to beginning their bank robbery spree, they were arrested and charged with criminal conspiracy. What act did Jack and Mary do that justifies a finding that they committed the crime? Explain.
12.1 Jerome is an elderly man who lives with his nephew, Philip. Jerome is totally dependent on Philip’s support. Philip tells Jerome that unless Jerome transfers a tract of land he owns to Philip for a price 30 percent below market value, Philip will no longer support and take care of him. Jerome enters into the contract. Discuss fully whether Jerome can set aside this contract.
No government is perfect and this is true of the United States. However, the checks and balance
The purpose of the textbook, Who Rules America? by G. William Domhoff, is to explain his theory of Class Domination. My essay emphasises the relation of social class to power, the existence of a Corporate community, the relationship of the Corporate community to the upper class, and various methods used by the Corporate community to dominate the U.S Political System. Furthermore, my essay will discuss the potential limits to corporate power in America.
It is a well-known fact that the government makes laws that benefit it, and sometimes to the detriment of the average citizen. Take, for example, the tax laws. You would be hard pressed to find a taxpayer who believes that paying taxes is fair. In fact most people would complain that they pay taxes all year by having an amount held out from their check, only to owe additional monies every April 15. This form of governmental taking is probably the most popular, but there are other actions that result in a private citizen losing their property to a governmental agency. However not every instance of a taking leaves the average citizen without a remedy, and in some instances not every instance of taken results in the person having less than when
While the federal government admittedly holds a dark history of losses towards major cases, as well as minor cases, one in ten cases, are nonetheless won by the federal government (Perrin, 2014, p. 2). Therefore, such circumstances bring to question if they 're designedly "failing" for personal benefit within the government. To further elaborate, the utmost of cases lost are policies in, which would be political suicide if such happened to be changed on their reckoning or don 't possess a significant influence. However, those above intentions can be scowled on the premise that government intervention in evaluating judgment, influence an individual 's right to fight for what they may consider as fair within the constitution.
Brenda Franklin had been serving Allied Tech for the past 8 years. As any other organisations, Brenda used to be a part of the lunch hour conversations with her colleagues. One day when her colleagues were discussing about corruption and politics, something occurred to her. As a result she prepared a list called “Ethically Dubious Conduct” and pasted it on the common notice board. Her colleagues were taken by surprise. Brenda was now anticipating the next lunch where she was expecting her list to be analysed among her colleagues.
In the 1960s, the United States was experiencing the balance of payment problem when its trade balance was in a substantial deficit, the US dollar was under an attack and a massive amount of gold flew out of its official reserve. Such issues in the balance of payment if exist for a long time can be a threat to the whole economy because balance of payment closely interacts with key macroeconomic variables such as GDP, exchange rates, interest rates and inflation rates. However, it was not an easy task for the Kennedy government to solve the balance of payment problem as
Large corporations such as Wal-Mart or Home Depot often come under criticism for putting mom-and-pop shops out of business. While this may be a valid criticism, the consumers neglect to realize that they play the biggest part in shutting these businesses down. Consumers across the country are always looking for the best deals or the lowest prices, and in most cases the larger corporations are where products can be found at the lowest price. Many small business owners and the populations of small towns dislike large corporations moving into the area because they believe it negatively effects the local
The need for clarification on the board requirements for a majority of independent directors as it relates to corporate governance is of great importance and would be discussed in this write up.