preview

Court Cases: The Scottsboro Trial

Decent Essays

The Scottsboro Boys were nine African American teenagers accused of raping two White American women on a train in Alabama in 1931. These were landmark legal cases due to this incident dealing with racism and the right to a fair trial. The cases included a lynch mob before suspects had even been indicted, all-white juries, rushed trials, and hostile disruptive mobs. It is often regarded as a grave example of a miscarriage of justice in the U.S. legal system. The boys were all promptly arrested and urged into speedy rushed trials. The case was originally heard in Scottsboro, Alabama with no arraignment or pretrial motions filed due to their trials being rushed as quickly as possible with very poor legal representation. All the boys excluding, …show more content…

Their testimonies were ultimately proven to have little to no effect on their cases. Even after the evidence came back negative for vaginal tearing consistent with rape, 8 out of 9 of the boys were still convicted and sentenced. Even after solid evidence was presented in defense of the boys they still found themselves of prejudice and hearsay evidence from not only Price but other “victims” from the car implicating them as “armed with knives” and that they were “attacked by a group of black teenagers” when reporting to the city sheriff. The persecution systematically tried to paint the boys as criminals and rapist even if the evidence wouldn’t stick and support their claim. It was even said that many years later, Judge Horton said that Dr. Lynch confided that the women had not been raped and had laughed when he examined them. The only reason this evidence clearly proving the rape claim false by Dr. Lynch didn’t come to light was because he felt that if he testified for the defense, his practice in Jackson County would be over. The defense, even if rendered ineffective used tactics to systematically breakdown each claim the prosecution and witnesses made against the boys. Ultimately, Judge Callahan repeatedly interrupted Leibowitz's cross-examinations, calling defense questions "arguing with the witness," "immaterial, …show more content…

Maybe I feel that way because of the case I chose due to the time period and the way the law was imposed differently in the time period for blacks. It didn’t really showcase the operation of the court system when they had rushed trials that at one point lasted only 3 days. This didn’t give me the full body of work of the court system due to the prejudice that not only tainted, but in my mind impeded justice from fully being served. And lastly, even if it was more to the operation of the supreme court you wouldn’t even know where to start since in this instance laws and trials weren’t as thorough in the defense of black people. You wouldn’t even be able to get a full feel of the court systems operation due to the fact most trials wouldn’t get to the point where certain operations or parts of the court system would need to come into play due to the nature of the rushed

Get Access